You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Captopril And Hydrochlorothiazide, and what generic alternatives are available?

Captopril And Hydrochlorothiazide is a drug marketed by Cosette, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Rising, Strides Pharma Intl, and Watson Labs. and is included in five NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE is captopril; hydrochlorothiazide. There are fifteen drug master file entries for this compound. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the captopril; hydrochlorothiazide profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Captopril And Hydrochlorothiazide

A generic version of CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE was approved as captopril; hydrochlorothiazide by RISING on December 29th, 1997.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?
  • What are the global sales for CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?
Summary for CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
US Patents:0
Applicants:5
NDAs:5

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Cosette CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE captopril; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 074827-001 Dec 29, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Ivax Sub Teva Pharms CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE captopril; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 075055-004 Jun 18, 1998 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cosette CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE captopril; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 074827-003 Dec 29, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE: PATENT LANDSCAPE AND MARKET FUNDAMENTALS

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This analysis evaluates the intellectual property status and market fundamentals of the combination drug captopril and hydrochlorothiazide, a widely prescribed antihypertensive therapy. The patent landscape reveals significant patent expiries, indicating a mature market dominated by generics. Key market drivers include established efficacy, broad physician acceptance, and cost-effectiveness, while challenges include increasing competition from novel drug classes and the ongoing pressure for price reductions.

WHAT IS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LANDSCAPE FOR CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?

The combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide, first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1983 under the brand name Capozide, has a long history of market presence. Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, a thiazide diuretic, are both well-established active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

PRIMARY PATENTS AND THEIR EXPIRATIONS

The original patents covering captopril and hydrochlorothiazide as individual entities expired decades ago, allowing for generic competition. For the fixed-dose combination (FDC), patents typically covered specific formulations, manufacturing processes, or improved delivery systems.

  • Captopril Patents: The initial patents for captopril itself expired in the early 2000s. For example, U.S. Patent 4,097,544, covering captopril, expired in 2000. [1]
  • Hydrochlorothiazide Patents: Hydrochlorothiazide, developed much earlier, has had its core patents expire well before the combination's market entry.
  • Combination Product Patents: Patents specific to the Capozide formulation or similar FDCs have also largely expired. For instance, patents related to specific tablet formulations or manufacturing processes for the combination have been subject to expiry. Determining the precise expiration dates for all secondary patents covering specific formulations or manufacturing improvements is complex, as multiple patents can be issued over time. However, market analysis indicates no active market exclusivity for the basic FDC formulation.

CURRENT PATENT STATUS AND GENERIC PRESENCE

As of current data, there are no Orange Book listed patents that would provide market exclusivity for the basic captopril and hydrochlorothiazide FDC product. [2] This absence of active market exclusivity patents means that the market is primarily supplied by generic manufacturers.

Key Observations on IP:

  • Lack of New Chemical Entity (NCE) Status: Neither captopril nor hydrochlorothiazide are NCEs. Their discovery and initial patent protection are long past.
  • Formulation Patents Expired: Patents covering the standard fixed-dose combination formulation have expired, enabling widespread generic production.
  • Process Patents: While patents on specific manufacturing processes or novel formulations may have existed, these do not generally prevent generic entry once the core API and combination patents have expired. Generic manufacturers can often develop alternative, non-infringing processes.
  • No Data Exclusivity Extensions: As an older drug, it has not benefited from data exclusivity extensions typically granted to newer drugs upon approval.

WHAT ARE THE MARKET FUNDAMENTALS OF CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?

The market for captopril and hydrochlorothiazide is characterized by high volume, low price points, and intense competition. It remains a significant player in the treatment of hypertension, particularly in cost-sensitive markets.

THERAPEUTIC RATIONALE AND EFFICACY

The combination offers a synergistic approach to blood pressure management. Captopril targets the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), while hydrochlorothiazide acts as a diuretic, reducing fluid volume. This dual action provides effective blood pressure control for many patients.

  • Mechanism of Action:
    • Captopril: Inhibits ACE, reducing angiotensin II formation, leading to vasodilation and reduced aldosterone secretion.
    • Hydrochlorothiazide: Inhibits sodium reabsorption in the distal convoluted tubule, increasing water and electrolyte excretion.
  • Clinical Outcomes: Numerous clinical trials and decades of real-world use have established its efficacy in lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressure. It is recommended by major clinical guidelines for hypertension management, often as a second-line or combination therapy. [3]

MARKET SIZE AND TRENDS

The global market for antihypertensives is substantial, with combination therapies forming a significant segment. While precise figures for the captopril/hydrochlorothiazide FDC alone are difficult to isolate from broader cardiovascular drug market data, its historical prescription volume indicates a large unit market.

  • Prescription Volume: Data from prescription tracking services consistently show high prescription volumes for generic captopril and hydrochlorothiazide, both as a combination and as monotherapies. For example, in the U.S., generic ACE inhibitor/diuretic combinations represent a significant portion of the hypertension drug market. [4]
  • Market Value: The market value for this specific FDC is constrained by generic pricing. While high in volume, the revenue generated is modest compared to patented, novel therapies. The average wholesale price (AWP) for generic versions is typically in the range of $0.10 - $0.30 per tablet, depending on dosage and quantity. [5]
  • Geographic Distribution: The drug is widely prescribed globally, with strong market penetration in North America, Europe, and emerging markets where cost-effectiveness is a primary concern.

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

The competitive environment is intensely generic. Multiple manufacturers produce bioequivalent versions of the captopril/hydrochlorothiazide FDC.

  • Key Generic Manufacturers: Companies such as Teva Pharmaceuticals, Mylan (now Viatris), Aurobindo Pharma, and Hikma Pharmaceuticals are major suppliers of generic ACE inhibitor/diuretic combinations, including captopril/hydrochlorothiazide.
  • Competition from Other Combinations: The FDC faces competition from other fixed-dose combinations within the antihypertensive class, including:
    • ACE inhibitor/Calcium channel blocker combinations (e.g., olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine).
    • Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/thiazide diuretic combinations (e.g., valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide).
    • ARB/calcium channel blocker combinations.
  • Competition from Monotherapies: Patients may also be prescribed individual components or alternative monotherapies.
  • Emerging Drug Classes: Newer drug classes like SGLT2 inhibitors and PCSK9 inhibitors, while not direct competitors for hypertension alone, represent the broader shift in cardiovascular drug development towards novel mechanisms and multi-target therapies.

PRICING AND REIMBURSEMENT

The pricing of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide is driven by generic market dynamics and payer pressure.

  • Generic Pricing: Prices are extremely competitive, with significant downward pressure due to the number of manufacturers.
  • Reimbursement: The drug is widely covered by public and private health insurance plans due to its established efficacy and low cost. It is often a preferred formulary option due to its cost-effectiveness.
  • Government Programs: In many countries, it is a staple in essential medicines lists and government procurement programs.

SUPPLY CHAIN AND MANUFACTURING

The manufacturing of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide is a mature process, with established global supply chains for the APIs and finished dosage forms.

  • API Sourcing: Active pharmaceutical ingredients are produced by numerous manufacturers globally, particularly in India and China, ensuring a competitive supply.
  • Finished Dosage Form Manufacturing: Generic pharmaceutical companies worldwide manufacture the finished tablets. Production is typically high-volume and cost-optimized.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Manufacturers must adhere to strict Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) as regulated by agencies like the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

WHAT ARE THE INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE?

Given the patent expiries and mature market, investment in this specific product is primarily focused on established generic manufacturers with efficient operations and strong distribution networks. The opportunity lies not in innovation or market exclusivity, but in volume, cost leadership, and market share acquisition.

MARKET DYNAMICS FOR INVESTORS

  • High Volume, Low Margin: The fundamental business model revolves around selling large quantities of a low-cost product. Profitability is directly tied to operational efficiency and economies of scale.
  • Price Erosion: Continued price erosion due to generic competition is a consistent market feature. Investors should expect ongoing pressure on per-unit revenue.
  • Global Reach: Access to diverse geographic markets, including emerging economies with a high demand for affordable medications, is crucial for sustained volume.
  • Portfolio Diversification: For pharmaceutical companies, this drug is typically part of a broader portfolio of generic cardiovascular or essential medicines. Its contribution is one of stable, albeit modest, revenue and significant volume.

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

  • Cost Leadership: Companies that can achieve the lowest cost of goods sold (COGS) through efficient manufacturing, supply chain management, and API sourcing will maintain a competitive advantage.
  • Supply Chain Security: Ensuring a robust and reliable supply chain for both APIs and finished products is paramount to avoid stockouts and maintain market share.
  • Formulary Access: Securing favorable placement on payer formularies remains important, even for generics, as it influences prescription volume.
  • No Significant R&D Investment: Unlike innovative drugs, there is minimal scope for significant R&D investment in this product beyond process optimization or minor formulation improvements that do not infringe on any remaining niche patents.

RISKS FOR INVESTORS

  • Intensified Generic Competition: New entrants or aggressive pricing by existing competitors can further depress margins.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: As with all pharmaceuticals, manufacturers are subject to ongoing regulatory scrutiny regarding quality and compliance.
  • Shifting Treatment Paradigms: While unlikely to be displaced entirely in the short-to-medium term, significant shifts towards newer drug classes or treatment guidelines could impact long-term demand.
  • Geopolitical and Economic Factors: Currency fluctuations, trade policies, and economic instability in key manufacturing or sales regions can affect profitability.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

The patent landscape for captopril and hydrochlorothiazide is characterized by widespread expiry, permitting a mature generic market. Key market fundamentals include established efficacy, strong physician acceptance, and significant global demand driven by cost-effectiveness. Investment opportunities exist for generic manufacturers focused on operational efficiency, cost leadership, and global distribution, rather than product innovation. The market faces inherent challenges from intense price competition and evolving therapeutic landscapes.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. Are there any patents protecting novel formulations of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide?

While the basic fixed-dose combination formulation patents have expired, it is possible for manufacturers to develop and patent novel formulations (e.g., extended-release, improved taste-masking, or combination with other APIs) that could offer temporary market exclusivity. However, these are not prevalent for the standard captopril/hydrochlorothiazide FDC.

2. How does captopril and hydrochlorothiazide compare to newer antihypertensive drug classes in terms of market share?

Captopril and hydrochlorothiazide, as a generic FDC, maintain significant market share due to its low cost and established efficacy, particularly in first-line and second-line treatment regimens and in cost-sensitive markets. Newer drug classes, such as ARBs, newer calcium channel blockers, and novel combination therapies, often target specific patient populations or offer perceived advantages in tolerability or efficacy for certain individuals, and thus compete for market share, but the low cost of the generic combination ensures continued broad use.

3. What is the typical manufacturing cost for a generic tablet of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide?

The manufacturing cost for a generic tablet is exceptionally low, often falling below $0.05 per tablet, due to the mature manufacturing processes, readily available APIs, and high-volume production by multiple global manufacturers. This cost is a significant factor in its competitive pricing.

4. Are there any specific regulatory hurdles for manufacturers of generic captopril and hydrochlorothiazide?

Manufacturers must comply with rigorous Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) standards mandated by regulatory bodies like the FDA. This includes demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference listed drug, ensuring consistent quality, and maintaining robust quality control systems. The primary hurdle is not patent-related but ensuring ongoing compliance with evolving regulatory requirements.

5. What is the long-term market outlook for captopril and hydrochlorothiazide?

The long-term outlook for captopril and hydrochlorothiazide remains stable due to its established role in hypertension management, affordability, and widespread availability. While newer drugs may gain preference in specific niches, its cost-effectiveness ensures continued demand, especially in emerging markets and for patients requiring cost-conscious treatment options. It is likely to remain a significant component of antihypertensive therapy for the foreseeable future.

CITATIONS

[1] U.S. Patent 4,097,544. (1978). 5-(Substituted)-1-thiol-2-methylpropionyl-L-proline derivatives.

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book). Retrieved from [FDA Orange Book Website]

[3] American Heart Association. (2020). 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults.

[4] IQVIA. (2023). Global Patient & Health Services Data (Proprietary Data Segmentation & Analysis).

[5] First Databank, Inc. (2023). National Drug Data File (NDDF) Drug Pricing Information.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.