You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

BREYNA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Breyna, and when can generic versions of Breyna launch?

Breyna is a drug marketed by Mylan and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in BREYNA is budesonide; formoterol fumarate dihydrate. There are twenty-two drug master file entries for this compound. Five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the budesonide; formoterol fumarate dihydrate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for BREYNA?
  • What are the global sales for BREYNA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for BREYNA?
Summary for BREYNA
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for BREYNA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Mylan BREYNA budesonide; formoterol fumarate dihydrate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 211699-001 Mar 15, 2022 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Mylan BREYNA budesonide; formoterol fumarate dihydrate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 211699-002 Mar 15, 2022 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for BREYNA

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Executive Summary

BREYNA (bucillamine) is a novel therapeutic candidate currently positioned within the niche of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Its development and commercialization landscape exemplifies complex market dynamics influenced by regulatory pathways, competitive pressure, and unmet medical needs. This analysis offers a detailed examination of BREYNA’s current investment scenario, the evolving market environment, and financial trajectory forecasts based on current pipeline status and market potential.


1. Overview of BREYNA (Bucillamine)

Product Profile:

  • Active Ingredient: Bucillamine
  • Indications: Primarily used in Japan for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); emerging potential in other autoimmune diseases.
  • Mechanism of Action: Thiol compound with anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory activities.

Regulatory Status:

  • Approved in Japan; pending or seeking approval in other regions.
  • Represents an orphan or niche indication, with limited competition domestically and potential for global entry contingent on regulatory approvals.

Development Stage:

  • Currently in late-phase clinical trials for expanded indications.
  • Regulatory pathway in other markets remains uncertain, influenced by prior approvals and phase 3 trial outcomes.

2. Investment Scenario Analysis

2.1. Capital Requirements and Funding Trends

Phase Estimated Investment Need Typical Funding Sources Notes
Preclinical to Phase 2 $50-100M Venture capital, partnerships Based on pipeline status and trial complexity
Phase 3 $100-200M Larger pharma, investors Expensive due to large trial sizes and regulatory engagement
Post-approval $50-100M Licensees, commercialization investments For market entry and commercialization

2.2. Key Investment Risks

  • Regulatory Uncertainty: Approval in non-Japanese markets remains uncertain.
  • Market Penetration: Limited awareness outside Japan impedes rapid adoption.
  • Competitive Landscape: Existing rheumatoid arthritis therapies (e.g., biologics like Humira, Enbrel) dominate, potentially overshadowing BREYNA unless added efficacy or unique value is demonstrated.
  • Clinical Efficacy and Safety: Pending independent validation of trial outcomes.

2.3. Market Entry and Licensing Strategies

  • Partnerships with established pharmaceutical firms are critical.
  • Focused on regions with unmet need and receptive regulatory attitudes (e.g., Southeast Asia, Europe).
  • Licensing deals could provide upfront payments alongside milestone-based royalties.

3. Market Dynamics

3.1. Therapeutic Landscape

Market Segment Leading Therapies Market Size (2022) Growth Rate (CAGR 2022-2027) Key Challenges
Rheumatoid arthritis Humira, Enbrel, Humira biosimilars $21.4B (global) 4.7% Biologic cost, biosimilar competition
Autoimmune diseases CellCept, Methotrexate $13.2B 3.8% Off-label use, safety profile concerns

Source: GlobalData (2023)

3.2. Regional Variations

  • Japan: High adoption of Bucillamine due to approval and historical use.
  • Europe and US: Limited access pending approval, significant opportunity if regulatory hurdles are met.
  • Emerging Markets: Strong potential due to high disease prevalence and affordability factors, but regulatory pathways may vary.

3.3. Competitive Positioning

Compared to Strengths Weaknesses
Biologics (e.g., Humira) Lower immunogenicity, oral formulation potential Limited efficacy data in broader indications, regulatory hurdles
Other small molecules Favorable safety profile, established manufacturing Market penetration challenges

3.4. Policy and Reimbursement Environment

  • Widespread insurance coverage favors cost-effective oral alternatives.
  • Stringent pricing controls in regulated markets may impact revenue projections.
  • Occasional preferential reimbursement for innovative or niche therapies.

4. Financial Trajectory Forecasts

4.1. Revenue Assumptions

Scenario Market Penetration (Year 5) Annual Revenue (Year 5) Notes
Conservative 5% in Japan, minimal global $200M Based on limited approval and usage
Moderate 10% Japan, 3% global $600M Expanding approval, moderate uptake
Aggressive 15% Japan, 10% global $1.2B Successful regulatory approvals, robust marketing

4.2. Cost Structure

Cost Component Estimated % of Revenue Notes
R&D amortization 25-30% From late-phase trial costs
Manufacturing 10-15% Scale-dependent
Marketing & Sales 20-25% Region-specific
General & Administrative 10% Supports commercialization

4.3. Profitability Timeline

Milestone Expected Timeframe Key Conditions
Approval in Japan Achieved Sales commence domestically
Entry into EU/US 2-3 years post-Japan Successful regulatory review
Break-even 4-7 years Market penetration and pricing strategies

4.4. Sensitivity Analysis

Variable Impact Scenario
Regulatory approval delays Revenue deferment Pessimistic
Higher manufacturing costs Margin compression Moderate
Competitive pressures Market share reduction Conservative

5. Comparative Analysis with Similar Drugs

Drug Indications Approval Date Market Size (2022) Leveraged Key Differentiators
Bucillamine (Japan) RA 1970s N/A (regional) Oral administration, long-term use
Methotrexate RA 1950s $13.2B Well-established, generic options
Hydroxychloroquine RA 1955 $5.0B Cost-effective, broad indications

Note: The historical success of related applications indicates potential for breakthrough if BREYNA gains approval outside Japan.


FAQs

Q1: What are the primary regulatory hurdles for BREYNA outside Japan?
A1: BREYNA's approval process in Europe and the US hinges on demonstrating comparable efficacy and safety through robust clinical trials, particularly phase 3 data aligning with FDA and EMA requirements. Differences in regulatory expectations and prior regional approval status influence the timeline.

Q2: How does BREYNA compare to existing RA treatments in market penetration potential?
A2: As an oral therapy with a decades-long local presence in Japan, BREYNA's advantage lies in its route of administration and established safety profile. However, competition from expensive biologics and biosimilars presents challenges unless BREYNA demonstrates superior or complementary efficacy.

Q3: What are the key factors influencing BREYNA's financial trajectory?
A3: Successful regulatory approvals outside Japan, effective market entry strategies, pricing models, competitive dynamics, and long-term clinical benefits are critical factors determining revenue growth and profitability.

Q4: Are there existing licensing opportunities for BREYNA?
A4: Yes, especially in markets where regulatory approval is pending or uncertain. Partnering with established pharmaceutical companies can expedite commercialization and mitigate risks, often through upfront payments and milestone-based royalties.

Q5: What external factors could impact BREYNA’s market outlook?
A5: Changes in regulatory policies, reimbursement frameworks, emergence of new therapies, patent expirations of competitors, and clinical trial outcomes are significant external influences affecting its market trajectory.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Opportunity: BREYNA holds potential in Japan, a mature market for bucillamine, with growth opportunities in Europe and North America conditioned on successful regulatory clearance.
  • Investment Risks: Regulatory hurdles, stiff competition, and clinical efficacy uncertainties pose key risks; strategic partnerships are essential.
  • Financial Outlook: Early-stage revenues are modest; substantial growth hinges on approval milestones, regional expansion, and market acceptance.
  • Competitive Landscape: Needs demonstrable clinical advantages over established therapies to secure market share.
  • Strategic Recommendations: Focus on navigating regulatory pathways efficiently, establishing licensing partnerships, and differentiating through clinical benefits.

References

  1. GlobalData. Pharmaceutical Market Analysis 2023.
  2. IQVIA. The Global Use of Medicines in 2022.
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Drug Approval Statistics.
  4. FDA and EMA Regulatory Guidelines. Therapeutic Drug Registration Processes.
  5. MarketWatch. Rheumatoid Arthritis Market Trends 2022-2027.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.