Last Updated: May 3, 2026

BACTOCILL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Bactocill patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Bactocill is a drug marketed by Glaxosmithkline and Baxter Hlthcare and is included in six NDAs.

The generic ingredient in BACTOCILL is oxacillin sodium. There are thirty-eight drug master file entries for this compound. Six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the oxacillin sodium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Bactocill

A generic version of BACTOCILL was approved as oxacillin sodium by SAGENT PHARMS on March 30th, 2012.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for BACTOCILL?
  • What are the global sales for BACTOCILL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for BACTOCILL?
Summary for BACTOCILL
US Patents:0
Applicants:2
NDAs:6

US Patents and Regulatory Information for BACTOCILL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline BACTOCILL oxacillin sodium CAPSULE;ORAL 061336-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline BACTOCILL oxacillin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 062736-001 Dec 19, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline BACTOCILL oxacillin sodium CAPSULE;ORAL 062241-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline BACTOCILL oxacillin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 061334-009 Mar 26, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

BACTOCILL (Bacampicillin): Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 23, 2026

BACTOCILL is a branded form of bacampicillin, a prodrug of ampicillin in the aminopenicillin class. For investment underwriting, the core question is not pipeline novelty but product life-cycle position, dependence on mature antibiotic markets, and the durability of supply and IP in each geography. Public information for “BACTOCILL” itself is fragmented by country and manufacturer branding, so the analysis below anchors to bacampicillin’s established regulatory and commercial profile rather than any single-market marketing narrative.


What is BACTOCILL and where does it sit in the drug landscape?

BACTOCILL = bacampicillin, an oral aminopenicillin prodrug that converts to ampicillin. Clinically, it targets typical susceptible bacterial infections historically covered by aminopenicillins (respiratory and other common bacterial sites, depending on local label).

Therapeutic class: Aminopenicillin antibiotic (prodrug of ampicillin)
Mechanism: Oral prodrug hydrolyzed to ampicillin (beta-lactam antibacterial activity)
Market position (practical): Mature, low-innovation antibiotic category

Investment implication: The product is in the territory of generics, price competition, and guideline-driven demand rather than patent-led value creation.


How do fundamentals map to bacampicillin’s economics?

Demand drivers

  1. Guideline inclusion by geography
    • Aminopenicillins remain in many empiric and directed therapy pathways when susceptibility patterns support use.
  2. Bacterial resistance and stewardship pressure
    • Stewardship reduces broad use of beta-lactams where resistance risk is high and de-escalation is expected.
  3. Seasonality and infection incidence
    • Respiratory infection cycles can support baseline demand, though this is typically modest for older, off-patent antibiotics.

Supply and pricing structure

  1. Generic penetration is structurally high
    • Bacampicillin has been marketed for decades; most markets rely on generics rather than originator economics.
  2. Price compression is common
    • Antibiotics experience competitive tendering and reimbursement pressure, especially where multiple interchangeable options exist.
  3. Formulation and packaging matter
    • Oral tablet/capsule formats trade on stability, bioavailability equivalence, and cost per dose.

Investment implication: Returns hinge on distribution economics, inventory and supply chain execution, tender access, and stable regulatory status, not clinical differentiation.


What does the IP and exclusivity profile usually look like for bacampicillin/BACTOCILL?

Typical IP reality for legacy antibiotics

  • Patent term has long expired for bacampicillin in most jurisdictions due to the long commercial history of aminopenicillins and the age of bacampicillin.
  • Value capture shifts to:
    • brand moat (where allowed and maintained),
    • contract manufacturing relationships,
    • regulatory dossier control (where generics rely on reference and formulation),
    • and market access through local regulatory compliance rather than exclusivity.

Investment implication: For a buyer/investor, “BACTOCILL” tends to behave like a branded generic or marketed off-patent product depending on country-specific regulatory and commercial facts.


Where is upside most likely: brand strength, access, or portfolio packaging?

Most credible upside pathways

  1. Country-by-country market access
    • Where reimbursement and procurement favor established brands, BACTOCILL can retain share despite generic availability.
  2. Supply reliability and cost-to-serve
    • In older antibiotic classes, procurement often rewards consistent availability and competitive unit economics.
  3. Portfolio bundling
    • Manufacturers that supply multiple antibiotic lines can cross-leverage procurement relationships and distribution.

Lowest-likelihood upside pathways

  • Clinical breakthrough
    • The core bacampicillin mechanism is not a modern innovation driver; differentiation must come from formulation, dosing convenience, or narrow indications supported by local evidence.

Investment implication: Underwrite as a cash-yield product with operational risks rather than a growth narrative.


What regulatory and stewardship factors can directly change revenue?

Regulatory

  • Renewals of marketing authorizations
    • Legacy products must maintain compliance with updated quality standards and labeling requirements.
  • Substitution rules and interchangeability
    • Pharmacy substitution and payer formulary switching can reduce branded share rapidly.

Stewardship

  • Antibiotic stewardship programs
    • Restrict empiric use and drive culture-guided or guideline-concordant prescribing.
  • Resistance surveillance
    • Local resistance patterns can shift preferred therapy away from aminopenicillins toward other beta-lactams or non-beta-lactams.

Investment implication: The key risk is not “drug failure,” but formulary and prescribing drift tied to resistance and guideline updates.


How should investors evaluate market size and competitive intensity?

Competitive intensity signals to model

  • Number of authorized generic manufacturers
    • More entrants typically mean faster price erosion.
  • Tender frequency and procurement structure
    • Where hospitals buy via tenders, margins can swing materially with lowest-bid dynamics.
  • Therapeutic alternatives
    • Penicillin class alternatives, cephalosporins, macrolides, and newer agents can steal share depending on local stewardship.

Quant model structure (practical)

  • Revenue = (Units sold) x (Net price)
  • Net price = List price x (payer/procurement discounts)
  • Units sold = Prescriber volume x Share x Adherence to guidelines

Investment implication: The scenario most consistent with mature antibiotics is stable volume with declining net price, unless a market retains brand preference or procurement contracts.


What investment scenarios are most plausible for BACTOCILL?

Base case (most common for mature oral antibiotics)

  • Share stabilizes due to established channel relationships
  • Net price continues to compress as generics price compete
  • Margin depends on COGS and tender positioning

Downside case (policy or competitive shocks)

  • Formulary downgrade or procurement shift
  • Additional generic entries
  • Resistance-guideline shifts reducing aminopenicillin use

Upside case (operational or access win)

  • Longer-term procurement contract
  • Supply advantage (less stock-out risk than competitors)
  • Regulatory status stays unchallenged while branded share remains protected

Investment implication: The investment lens should treat BACTOCILL like a procurement-and-margin engine, where operational execution drives outcomes.


What should be treated as key due diligence items?

  1. Regulatory standing by geography
    • Active marketing authorizations, compliance posture, and any variations impacting manufacturing or labeling.
  2. Manufacturing footprint and redundancy
    • Ability to maintain consistent supply during demand spikes or component shortages.
  3. Pricing and contract visibility
    • Tender cycle exposure, contract duration, and discount commitments.
  4. Quality and pharmacovigilance
    • CAPA history, batch rejection rates, and safety signal handling.
  5. Competitive roster mapping
    • Who sells bacampicillin in each target market, and at what pricing bands.

Investment implication: For off-patent antibiotics, diligence is primarily execution and compliance, not R&D.


Key Takeaways

  • BACTOCILL (bacampicillin) is a mature aminopenicillin prodrug product, so investment upside usually comes from market access, supply reliability, and margin control, not innovation.
  • Fundamentals are dominated by generic competition, procurement and reimbursement pressure, antibiotic stewardship, and local guideline/resistance dynamics.
  • Underwrite using a revenue decomposition model (units x net price) with scenarios centered on price erosion speed and share retention.
  • Diligence should focus on regulatory status, manufacturing redundancy, tender contract exposure, and competitive roster pricing.

FAQs

1) Is BACTOCILL considered an on-patent product?

BACTOCILL is a branded form of bacampicillin, which is a long-established antibiotic category. In most markets, economics typically reflect off-patent or limited exclusivity realities common to legacy antibiotic prodrugs.

2) What drives revenue for BACTOCILL more: volume or price?

For mature oral antibiotics, net price usually moves faster than unit volume due to generic and tender competition. Revenue sensitivity often concentrates in discounts and procurement outcomes.

3) What is the main clinical risk for bacampicillin?

The clinical risk is generally tied to local resistance patterns and guideline stewardship shifts that reduce where aminopenicillins are preferred.

4) What is the biggest operational risk?

Supply continuity and quality compliance. Antibiotics require reliable manufacturing and consistent batch performance to avoid stock-outs, recalls, and tender penalties.

5) Where can an investor find most actionable value?

In mature antibiotic markets, value often sits in channel contracts, procurement relationships, manufacturing scale and yield, and regulatory resilience rather than new clinical differentiation.


References

[1] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Public assessment and product information resources for aminopenicillin/bacampicillin medicines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[2] FDA. Drug label and antibiotic class resources (prodrug-to-ampicillin aminopenicillin context). https://www.fda.gov/drugs
[3] WHO. Antimicrobial stewardship guidance and resistance background affecting aminopenicillin utilization patterns. https://www.who.int/health-topics/antimicrobial-resistance
[4] PubMed. Bacampicillin and prodrug conversion/ampicillin pharmacology literature base. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.