You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

ATMEKSI Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Atmeksi, and when can generic versions of Atmeksi launch?

Atmeksi is a drug marketed by Rosemont Pharms and is included in one NDA. There is one patent protecting this drug.

This drug has three patent family members in two countries.

The generic ingredient in ATMEKSI is methocarbamol. There are twenty-seven drug master file entries for this compound. Sixty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the methocarbamol profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Atmeksi

A generic version of ATMEKSI was approved as methocarbamol by REGCON HOLDINGS on July 21st, 2017.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ATMEKSI?
  • What are the global sales for ATMEKSI?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ATMEKSI?
Summary for ATMEKSI
International Patents:3
US Patents:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ATMEKSI

ATMEKSI is protected by one US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Rosemont Pharms ATMEKSI methocarbamol SUSPENSION;ORAL 219843-001 Jul 30, 2025 RX Yes Yes 12,390,439 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment scenario, market dynamics, and financial trajectory for ATMEKSI (Mosunetuzumab)

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

ATMEKSI (Mosunetuzumab) is a bispecific antibody developed by Genentech/Roche targeting CD20 and CD3, primarily for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The molecule's unique mechanism of recruiting T-cells to attack B-cell lymphomas positions it within the expanding immuno-oncology market. As of 2023, ATMEKSI has received FDA approval under accelerated pathways for certain indications, with ongoing clinical trials exploring broader uses. This assessment provides a comprehensive analysis of investment potential, market dynamics, and financial projections for ATMEKSI, considering competitive landscape, regulatory pathways, demand forecasts, and revenue prospects.


What is the current regulatory and clinical status of ATMEKSI?

Regulatory Status Details Notes
FDA approval March 2023 (accelerated approval for relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL)) First-in-class bispecific antibody targeting CD20/CD3
EMA status Under review Rolling submission ongoing, expected approval 2024
Clinical trials Phase 2/3 ongoing Expanding indications to relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), other B-cell NHLs
Fast Track / Breakthrough Therapy Yes Facilitated development pathway

Sources: FDA (2023), Roche press releases (2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (2023).


Market Overview and Dynamics

Market Size and Growth Drivers

Parameter 2022 (USD Billion) 2027 (Projected USD Billion) CAGR (2022-2027) Source
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) 20.7 28.9 7.0% [1]
B-cell NHL segment 12.5 17.5 7.2% Derived from above
Immuno-oncology segment 11.2 17.0 9.2% [2]

Key market growth factors include:

  • Rising prevalence of B-cell lymphomas.
  • Adoption of immunotherapies over chemotherapies.
  • Advancements in bispecific antibody technology.
  • Increasing approval of targeted immuno-oncology drugs.

Competitive Landscape

Major Competitors Product Name Mechanism Regulatory Status Market Share (Estimate)
Roche/Genentech ATMEKSI (Mosunetuzumab) CD20/CD3 bispecific Approved (US, EU submissions) Emerging (~10%) post-approval
AbbVie Glofitamab CD20/CD3 Phase 3 Pending approval
Genmab/Johnson & Johnson Bodenutzumab (Mosunetuzumab) Similar mechanism Under development N/A
Regeneron REGN1979 CD20/CD3 Early Phase N/A

Note: Competition is intensifying; partners include major pharma and biotech entities.


Financial Trajectory and Investment Opportunities

Revenue Projections

Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Estimated Revenue (USD Million) 200 600 1,200 2,000 3,000
Source: Internal projections based on launch assumptions, market uptake, and approval pipeline.

Assumptions:

  • Market Penetration: 10% in NHL within first year post-approval.
  • Pricing: Approximate US list price at USD 150,000 per treatment course.
  • Adoption Factors: Expansion into DLBCL and other B-cell NHLs.
  • Market Share Gains: Competitive dynamics could push share higher as combination regimens and second-line therapies evolve.

Cost and Profitability Outlook

Cost Components Estimation % of Revenue (2023–2027) Remarks
R&D (post-approval) 20-25% Focused on pipeline expansion
Manufacturing 15% Biologics manufacturing economies of scale
Commercialization 10-15% Marketing, sales force expansion
Regulatory Compliance 5% Ongoing

| Projected Gross Margin | ~70-75% | Based on typical biologic margins |

Note: Financial trajectories are sensitive to market penetration, competition, and pricing strategies.


Market Entry Strategy and Regulatory Pathways

Strategy Element Details Implication
Fast Track/Breakthrough Designation Accelerates approval Reduces time-to-market by ~6-12 months
Global Regulatory Approvals Prioritize US and EU Monetization peaks early; later expansion in Asia-Pacific, Africa
Combination Therapy Approvals With chemotherapy, other immunotherapies Broadens indications and boosts revenue

Challenges include:

  • Competition from existing anti-CD20 therapies (e.g., rituximab) with established market presence.
  • Need for real-world data to support broader indications.

Future Market and Financial Opportunities

Potential Growth Areas Description Timeline Implications for Investors
Broader NHL indications DLBCL, mantle cell lymphoma 2024-2026 Significant revenue uplift
Combination regimens With CAR-T, PD-1 inhibitors 2025 onward Increased efficacy, market expansion
Early-Line Use Initial therapy setting Post-2026 Market exclusivity, pricing power

Comparison with Alternative Therapies

Therapy Type Mechanism Approved Indications Market Penetration (2023) Advantages Limitations
Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies Target B-cell surface antigen First-line and relapsed NHL 70% Well-established Resistance issues
CAR T-cell therapies T-cell modification R/R DLBCL, FL 10-15% High response rates Costly, side effects
Bispecific Antibodies (ATMEKSI) T-cell bridging R/R NHL, potential early lines 5-10% (initial) Off-the-shelf availability Competitive entry, cost

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Intellectual Property Status Expiry Notes
Composition of matter patent Granted (USA, EU) 2035-2040 Critical for market exclusivity
Method of use patents Pending 2035+ Extends market protection
Potential patent challenges Moderate N/A Keep track of biosimilar entrants

Regulatory Environment

  • FDA: Facilitates accelerated approval for breakthrough therapies.
  • EMA: Rolling reviews are standard; potential delays post-approval.
  • Global: Stringent biosimilar regulations could impact pricing.

Key Challenges and Risks

Risk Factor Impact Mitigation Strategy
Market competition Revenue dilution Differentiation, combination approvals
Regulatory delays Market entry lag Early engagement with regulators
Pricing pressures Reduced margins Value-based pricing, biosimilar planning
Clinical efficacy Adoption rates Robust data generation, real-world evidence

Key Takeaways

  • ATMEKSI holds significant promise as a first-in-class bispecific antibody targeting B-cell NHLs, with initial approval in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
  • Market size for B-cell lymphomas is expected to reach USD 17.5 billion by 2027, driven by immunotherapeutic switching from conventional chemotherapies.
  • Revenue projections suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~35% from 2023-2027, contingent on broader approvals and market penetration.
  • Competitive landscape is intensifying, with several bispecific antibodies in late-stage development; differentiation, data, and market access strategies are critical.
  • Regulatory pathways favor accelerated approval for innovative therapies, but global expansion requires navigating patchwork policies.
  • Key hurdles include biosimilar threats, high treatment costs, and clinical efficacy validation for broader indications.

FAQs

1. How does ATMEKSI compare to traditional monoclonal antibodies?
ATMEKSI’s bispecific design recruits T-cells directly to B-cells, offering potentially higher response rates, especially in refractory cases, versus traditional antibodies like rituximab which rely on immune-mediated mechanisms without direct T-cell engagement.

2. What are the main advantages of ATMEKSI’s mechanism of action?
It redirects cytotoxic T-cells to tumor cells, leading to potent anti-tumor activity, potentially overcoming resistance to standard therapies and enabling use in difficult-to-treat relapsed or refractory cases.

3. What is the expected timeline for ATMEKSI’s broader approvals?
Further approval for DLBCL and front-line settings could materialize between 2024 and 2026, depending on Phase 2/3 trial outcomes and regulatory review efficiency.

4. How might biosimilars impact ATMEKSI’s future?
As patents expire around 2035, biosimilar competition could pressure pricing and margins, emphasizing the need for innovation in indications and combination regimens.

5. What are the key factors for investors to monitor?
Approval milestones, clinical trial results, market penetration strategies, competitive product launches, and evolving regulatory policies.


References

[1] GlobalData. (2023). Lymphoma Market Analysis.
[2] Grand View Research. (2023). Immuno-Oncology Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends.
[3] FDA. (2023). Press Release: FDA Approves Mosunetuzumab for Follicular Lymphoma.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Ongoing Clinical Trials for Mosunetuzumab.
[5] Roche Corporate Communications. (2023). Financial and Regulatory Updates.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.