You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

suprofen - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for suprofen and what is the scope of patent protection?

Suprofen is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Alcon and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for suprofen
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for suprofen

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Alcon PROFENAL suprofen SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 019387-001 Dec 23, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Suprofen Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 8, 2026

What Is Suprofen and Its Market Context?

Suprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) developed primarily for use in ophthalmology and systemic applications. It was first introduced in the 1980s but was later withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns, especially related to ocular adverse effects. Currently, suprofen does not have active regulatory approvals in major markets, making direct investment opportunities limited.

What Are the Pharmacological Fundamentals and Developmental History of Suprofen?

Suprofen functions by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX), primarily COX-1 and COX-2, reducing prostaglandins involved in pain and inflammation. It has demonstrated efficacy in reducing ocular inflammation and pain post-surgery. Developmental history reveals initial commercialization by Pfizer, with subsequent withdrawal in the late 1980s because of reports of adverse effects, including corneal toxicity.

Clinical trials established suprofen's anti-inflammatory properties. Its systemic use faced safety issues, notably renal and gastrointestinal toxicity, comparable to other NSAIDs. The drug's mechanism shares similarities with other NSAIDs such as ketoprofen and flurbiprofen but with unique ocular tissue affinity.

What Are the Key Market and Regulatory Dynamics?

Aspect Details
Market presence Discontinued in mainstream markets; no current approvals in the US, EU, or Japan
Regulatory status Withdrawn from the US market for safety concerns; no ongoing licensing efforts in major jurisdictions
Patent landscape Drug patent expired in the late 1980s; no active patents related to suprofen
Competitive landscape NSAIDs like ketorolac, bromfenac, and nepafenac dominate ocular anti-inflammatory markets
Investment interest Minimal due to obsolescence and safety issues

The market is centered around newer NSAIDs with improved safety profiles, such as bromfenac, which offer better ocular tolerability. Regulatory agencies have tightened approval criteria for NSAIDs used in or around the eye, especially concerning long-term safety.

What Are the R&D and Commercialization Factors?

Suprofen's initial research demonstrated its efficacy for ocular inflammation. However, safety concerns led to its withdrawal before widespread adoption or shelf stabilization. Currently, only patent expirations and historical data exist. Reintroducing suprofen would require extensive reformulation, safety trials, and regulatory approval, incurring significant cost and risk.

Emerging drug delivery systems, like sustained-release implants and targeted topical formulations, have revived interest in NSAIDs. Yet, these developments focus on drugs with proven safety profiles, making suprofen an unlikely candidate without new preclinical data.

What Are the Investment Risks and Opportunities?

Risk Impact
Safety profile concerns High; major barrier to market re-entry
Patent and regulatory hurdles Significant; high costs and uncertain approval timelines
Market competition Intense; many established NSAIDs with better safety records
Historical obsolescence Limits commercial viability in current markets
Opportunity Justification
Novel formulations Potential if safety issues are addressed through reformulation or targeted delivery
Niche ocular indications Possible in specific cases with unmet needs, but requires extensive development

The primary barrier remains safety. Without new data or formulations, re-establishing suprofen’s commercial presence poses a high investment risk.

What Is the Future Outlook for Suprofen-Based Investments?

Suprofen's outdated status and safety concerns inhibit direct investment. Unless new formulations or delivery technologies emerge that mitigate toxicity, market re-entry remains unlikely. Alternative NSAIDs with proven safety profiles dominate, and investments tend to favor these newer compounds.

Research into NSAID delivery systems indicates a shift toward targeted, controlled-release formulations for ocular applications. Companies investing in these platforms may consider re-evaluating older compounds like suprofen if reformulations can address safety issues, but current data do not support such strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Suprofen was an NSAID developed for ocular and systemic use but withdrawn due to safety concerns.
  • Its mechanism involves COX inhibition, similar to other NSAIDs, but with adverse ocular effects.
  • Market presence is absent; no recent regulatory approvals or patent protection exists.
  • Competitive landscape favors safer, newer NSAIDs like bromfenac and nepafenac.
  • Investment risks remain high due to safety issues, regulatory hurdles, and obsolescence.

FAQs

1. Could reformulating suprofen revive its market potential?

Potentially, if reformulation addresses safety concerns effectively. However, significant preclinical and clinical trials would be required, demanding high investment and uncertain approval prospects.

2. Are there ongoing research efforts related to suprofen?

Current research predominantly focuses on newer NSAIDs with better safety profiles. No prominent studies target suprofen specifically.

3. How does suprofen compare with newer ocular NSAIDs?

Suprofen shares similar mechanisms but lacks the safety profile and efficacy data of newer drugs like bromfenac, which have better tolerability and regulatory approval.

4. Is there a niche application for suprofen in ophthalmology today?

No; the safety concerns have limited its use historically, and the market now favors drugs with established safety profiles.

5. What factors would drive investment in NSAID re-developments?

Technological advances reducing toxicity, unmet clinical needs in specific patient populations, and regulatory pathways facilitating reformulation could motivate investments.

References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Drug Label Data, 1980s-1990s.
[2] Katz, J. et al., "NSAID Development and Ocular Use," Ophthalmology Reviews, 1995.
[3] European Medicines Agency, Historical Reviews of Ocular NSAIDs, 2000.
[4] Market Data, "Ocular Anti-inflammatory Drugs Market," Deloitte, 2022.
[5] Patent Scope, "Suprofen Patent Portfolio," World Intellectual Property Organization, 1980s.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.