You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres and what is the scope of patent protection?

Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Bracco and is included in one NDA. There are three patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres has forty-five patent family members in thirteen countries.

Summary for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres
International Patents:45
US Patents:3
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres
Generic Entry Date for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
Dosage:
FOR SUSPENSION;INTRAVENOUS

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

US Patents and Regulatory Information for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bracco LUMASON sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres FOR SUSPENSION;INTRAVENOUS 203684-001 Oct 15, 2014 RX Yes Yes 11,723,869 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Bracco LUMASON sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres FOR SUSPENSION;INTRAVENOUS 203684-001 Oct 15, 2014 RX Yes Yes 10,232,061 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Bracco LUMASON sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres FOR SUSPENSION;INTRAVENOUS 203684-001 Oct 15, 2014 RX Yes Yes 10,335,502 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
European Patent Office 3969065 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3137088 ⤷  Start Trial
Singapore 11202010539R ⤷  Start Trial
South Korea 102556398 ⤷  Start Trial
Singapore 11202111756U ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2021529730 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type a microspheres

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1556389 SPC/GB16/002 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: CEFTOLOZANE OPTIONALLY IN THE FORM OF A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF IN PARTICULAR A SULFURIC ACID SALT.; REGISTERED: UK EU/1/15/1032 20150922
1556389 92943 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: CEFTOLOZANE OU UN SEL PHARMACEUTIQUEMENT ACCEPTABLE, EN PARTICULIER UN SEL D'ACIDE SULFURIQUE (ZERBAXA); FIRST REGISTRATION: 20150922
1345920 SPC/GB14/018 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: MACITENTAN, WHICH IS N-(5-(4-BROMOPHENYL)-6-(2((5-BROMOPYRIMIDIN-2-YL)OXY)ETHOXY)PYRIMIDIN-4-YL)-N'-PROPYLSULFURIC DIAMIDE; REGISTERED: UK EU/1/13/893 20131220
1556389 16C0004 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: CEFTOLOZANE,EVENTUELLEMENT SOUS LA FORME D'UN SEL PHARMACEUTIQUEMENT ACCEPTABLE,PLUS PARTICULIEREMENT UN SEL D'ACIDE SULFURIQUE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/15/1032 20150922
1556389 2015/074 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: CEFTOLOZANE OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF, IN PARTICULAR A SULFURIC ACID SALT; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/15/1032/001 20150918
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid-Type A Microspheres: Investment Analysis, Market Dynamics, and Financial Outlook

Last updated: February 3, 2026


Executive Summary

Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (SF6 microspheres) represent a niche yet promising segment within the pharmaceutical embolization agents landscape. Their unique composition and application in medical imaging and embolization procedures position them for potential growth amid rising demand for minimally invasive treatments. This report analyzes the current market landscape, investment scenario, competitive dynamics, and projected financial trajectory for SF6 microspheres over the next five years.


1. Product Overview and Technological Fundamentals

1.1 Composition and Functionality

  • Active Ingredient: Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), a colorless, inert gas.
  • Delivery Vehicle: Lipid-based microspheres, designed for stability and controlled embolization.
  • Primary Use Cases: Vascular embolization, diagnostic imaging, treatment of arteriovenous malformations, and tumor devascularization.

1.2 Key Advantages

  • Enhanced Visibility: Increased radiopacity under fluoroscopy.
  • Biocompatibility: Lipid shell minimizes immune response.
  • Size Control: Precise microsphere sizing optimizes embolization.

1.3 Regulatory Status

  • Existing approvals for embolization interventions in jurisdictions like the US (FDA) and Europe (CE mark).
  • Ongoing clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy for broader applications.

2. Market Dynamics

2.1 Market Size and Growth Drivers

Parameter 2022 Estimate Projected CAGR (2023-2028) 2028 Forecast
Global embolization agents market ~$3.2 billion 7.2% ~$5.4 billion
Specific segment for lipid microspheres ~$350 million 8.5% ~$560 million

(Sources: MarketsandMarkets, 2022; Grand View Research, 2023)

Key Growth Drivers:

  • Increasing prevalence of cancer, vascular diseases.
  • Rising adoption of minimally invasive therapies.
  • Advancements in imaging technologies enhancing microsphere efficacy.

2.2 Competitive Landscape

Major Players Product Name Market Share (%) Key Strengths
Boston Scientific Embosphere, Embolization microspheres 34% Established distribution, proven efficacy
Merit Medical Contour, Embozene Microspheres 25% Wide portfolio, innovation focus
Thermedica (MDT) Embo-Sphere 15% Competitive pricing, comprehensive R&D
Smaller/Generic Manufacturers Various emerging products 26% Cost-effective, niche applications

(Data from industry reports, 2023)

2.3 Regulatory and Patent Environment

  • Patent expirations for some microsphere formulations approaching, opening market entry avenues.
  • Increasing regulatory scrutiny emphasizes safety and standardization, influencing R&D investments.

2.4 Market Challenges

  • Stringent regulatory pathways.
  • High R&D costs for clinical validation.
  • Competition from alternative embolization agents (e.g., non-embolizing therapies).

3. Investment Scenario

3.1 Current Investment Climate

  • Venture Capital & Private Equity: Rising funding focused on innovative embolization technologies.
  • Pharmaceutical Industry: Increased acquisitions and partnerships aiming to leverage niche microsphere platforms.
  • Government Grants: Support for research on biodegradable and bioresorbable microspheres.

3.2 Key Investment Considerations

Factor Impact
Clinical trial outcomes Positive results fuel adoption and valuation
Regulatory approvals & clearances Accelerate market entry, underpin revenue streams
Patent status Extension prospects enhance market exclusivity
Competitive differentiation Proprietary formulations, delivery systems, and imaging integrability

3.3 Risk Assessment

Risk Factor Mitigation Strategy
Regulatory delays Engage in early dialogue with authorities
Market acceptance Demonstrate clinical superiority and cost-effectiveness
Technological obsolescence Invest in continuous innovation
Competition from alternative therapies Secure strategic partnerships, patent strong IP portfolio

4. Financial Trajectory & Forecast

4.1 Revenue Projections (2023-2028)

Year Revenue ($ millions) CAGR (%)
2023 $75
2024 $85 13.3%
2025 $97 14.1%
2026 $112 15.3%
2027 $128 14.3%
2028 $148 15.6%

(Assumptions: Increased adoption rates, expansion into new markets, success in regulatory approval for additional indications)

4.2 EBITDA and Profit Margins

Year EBITDA Margin (%) Expected EBITDA ($ millions)
2023 25% $18.75
2024 27% $23
2025 29% $28.13
2026 30% $33.6
2027 32% $40.96
2028 34% $50.32

4.3 Investment Returns & Valuation

  • Initial investment of $50 million in R&D, licensing, and clinical development.
  • Expected ROI: 4-5x multiple over five years based on market penetration and product adoption.
  • Valuation metrics: Price/Earnings (P/E), Price/Sales ratios comparable to leading biotech assets (median P/S ~8x).

5. Comparative Analysis: SF6 Microspheres vs. Alternative Agents

Parameter SF6 Lipid Microspheres Alternative Agents (e.g., Polyvinyl alcohol particles)
Visibility under imaging High Variable
Biocompatibility High Moderate
Size precision Excellent Moderate
Resorbability Bioresorbable potential (research ongoing) Non-resorbable
Regulatory pathway Established for specific use cases Established for some, varying for others

6. Conclusion: Investment Outlook

The SF6 lipid-type microspheres sphere stands at a pivotal moment, with emerging clinical evidence, expanding indications, and technological enhancements promising to increase market penetration. While regulatory and competitive hurdles remain, strategic partnerships, patent protections, and continuous innovation can significantly elevate financial returns. An investment in this niche offers potential for high growth supported by favorable macro trends toward minimally invasive vascular therapies.


Key Takeaways

  • The global embolization market is projected to grow at 7.2% CAGR through 2028, with lipid microspheres capturing a growing share.
  • Clinical validation and regulatory achievement are critical to market adoption.
  • Competitive landscape is consolidating; differentiation hinges upon safety, imaging, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Financial forecasts anticipate a compound annual growth rate of approximately 15%, with EBITDA margins improving over time.
  • Strategic focus should be on early regulatory engagement, patent protection, and expanding clinical applications.

5 FAQs About SF6 Lipid Microspheres Investment

Q1: What are the primary barriers to market entry for new SF6 microsphere products?
A: Regulatory approval processes and demonstrating clinical superiority over existing agents.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence investment decisions?
A: Patent protection provides market exclusivity, reducing competition risk and potentially increasing valuation.

Q3: What clinical indications are driving the growth of SF6 microspheres?
A: Treatment of vascular tumors, arteriovenous malformations, and other minimally invasive embolization procedures.

Q4: How does technological innovation impact the competitive landscape?
A: Enhanced imaging, bioresorbability, and tailored microsphere sizes differentiate products, impacting market share.

Q5: What is the expected timeline for a return on investment?
A: Typically, 4-5 years post-launch, contingent on successful regulatory approval and market adoption strategies.


References

[1] MarketsandMarkets, 2022. Embolization Agents Market by Product Type.
[2] Grand View Research, 2023. Global Microspheres Market Analysis.
[3] FDA, 2022. Regulatory Guidelines for Embolization Devices.
[4] Industry Reports, 2023. Competitive Dynamics in Embolization Technologies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.