You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 18, 2026

romidepsin - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for romidepsin and what is the scope of patent protection?

Romidepsin is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Bristol-myers, Fresenius Kabi Usa, and Teva Pharms Usa Inc, and is included in three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for romidepsin
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for ROMIDEPSIN
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
ISTODAX Injection romidepsin 10 mg/vial 022393 1 2013-11-05

US Patents and Regulatory Information for romidepsin

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bristol-myers ISTODAX romidepsin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022393-001 Nov 5, 2009 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Fresenius Kabi Usa ROMIDEPSIN romidepsin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 206254-001 Oct 12, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva Pharms Usa Inc ROMIDEPSIN romidepsin SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 208574-001 Mar 13, 2020 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for romidepsin

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Bristol-myers ISTODAX romidepsin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022393-001 Nov 5, 2009 4,977,138 ⤷  Get Started Free
Bristol-myers ISTODAX romidepsin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022393-001 Nov 5, 2009 7,608,280 ⤷  Get Started Free
Bristol-myers ISTODAX romidepsin POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 022393-001 Nov 5, 2009 7,611,724 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for romidepsin

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Celgene Europe Ltd. Istodax romidepsin EMEA/H/C/002122treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), Refused no no yes 2013-02-12
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for Romidepsin

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

Romidepsin, marketed as Istodax®, is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Its unique mechanism of action and ongoing clinical research suggest potential expansion into other oncology indications, propelling future growth. This analysis assesses the current market landscape, competitive environment, emerging opportunities, and financial outlook for Romidepsin as an investment.


What is Romidepsin and How Does It Function?

Aspect Details
Chemical Class Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor
Mechanism Induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in malignant cells through epigenetic modulation
Approved Indications - CTCL (since 2011) - PTCL (since 2014)
Developed by Celgene Corporation (acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb in 2019)

Market Overview and Current Market Size

Parameter Figures / Data Sources
Global Hematologic Malignancies Market (2023) $40 billion [1]
Market share for Romidepsin (2023) Estimated $200 million Industry estimates
Key sales regions North America (~75%), Europe (~20%), Rest of World (~5%) BMS, 2023 reports

Key Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of CTCL and PTCL
  • Limited first-line treatment options for certain T-cell lymphomas
  • Approval of Romidepsin as a targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory cases
  • Growing awareness and diagnosis of lymphomas

Market Constraints

  • High treatment cost (~$15,000 - $20,000 per cycle)
  • Competitive therapies including pralatrexate, belinostat, other HDAC inhibitors
  • Challenges in expanding to broader oncology indications

Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

Current Competition

Drug Class Indications Market Share / Notes
Romidepsin HDAC inhibitor CTCL, PTCL Leadership in T-cell lymphomas
Belinostat (Beleodda) HDAC inhibitor PTCL Competitive alternative
Pralatrexate (Folotyn) Antifolate PTCL First approved for relapsed PTCL
Vorinostat (Zolinza) HDAC inhibitor CTCL Similar mechanism, less potent

Emerging Competitors & Future Therapeutics

  • Epigenetic Modulators: New HDAC inhibitors with improved efficacy/toxicity
  • Immuno-oncology agents: CAR T-cell therapies, bispecific antibodies
  • Small molecules targeting other pathways: BCL-2 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors

Regulatory Landscape

  • Pending approvals for expansion into solid tumors and other lymphoma subtypes
  • Accelerated pathways likely contingent on ongoing trial results

Clinical Development and Pipeline Prospects

Stage Drug Candidate Indications Key Data / Milestones Expected Timing
Phase 2-3 Trials Romidepsin + other agents Combination therapies for solid tumors Ongoing; preliminary results promising 2024-2026
Regulatory Filings Potential new indications Multiple lymphoma subtypes Based on clinical trial data 2025-2027

Potential Expansion

  • Solid tumor trials (e.g., ovarian, breast cancers)
  • Combination regimens with immunotherapies
  • Diagnostics to select patient populations likely to respond

Financial Trajectory and Investment Opportunities

Revenue Forecasts (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Revenue (USD) Growth Rate Supporting Factors
2023 $200 million Current sales dominated by North America
2025 $300 million 50% Market expansion, pipeline milestones
2030 $600 million 100% Potential indication expansion + increased adoption

Revenue Drivers

  • Market Expansion: Entry into new indications and geographies
  • Pricing: Price adjustment aligned with value-based care
  • Pipeline Success: Approval of combination regimens and new indications

Key Risks

  • Competitive pressure from other modalities
  • Regulatory hurdles slowing approval timelines
  • Market saturation in current indications
  • Pricing pressures from payers

Investment Analysis and Strategies

Approach Rationale Risks Mitigation Strategies
Buy-and-Hold Long-term growth in expanding indications Patent cliffs, competition Portfolio diversification, pipeline management
Early Entry into Trials Upcoming phase 2/3 trials may unlock value Clinical failure Due diligence on trial outcomes, adaptive strategies
Licensing or Partnerships Accelerate market entry or expand indications Dilution, dependency on partners Ensure strategic alignment and clear milestones

Regulatory and Patent Considerations

Aspect Details Implications
Patent Expiry Composition patent until late 2020s Generic entry possible post-expiry, affecting revenue
Orphan Drug Status Granted in certain indications, providing exclusivity Extends market protection and incentivizes development
Regulatory Policies US FDA, EMA pathways for accelerated approvals Potential for expedited pathways for new indications

Deep Dive: Cost-Benefit and Pricing Dynamics

Parameter Details Insights
Average Treatment Cost ~$15,000 - $20,000 per cycle High-cost therapy; significant revenue potential
Reimbursement Trends Payer resistance to high-cost treatments Necessity for demonstrating superior efficacy/safety
Cost-Effectiveness Data supports value for relapsed/refractory cases Reimbursement more likely aligned with clinical benefit

Comparison with Similar Therapies

Medication Class Approved Indications Market Position Pricing Range
Romidepsin HDAC inhibitor CTCL, PTCL First-in-class in T-cell lymphomas $15,000 - $20,000 per cycle
Belinostat HDAC inhibitor PTCL Competitive alternative ~$14,000 per cycle
Pralatrexate Antifolate PTCL Established monotherapy ~$10,000 per cycle

Key Regulatory and Policy Trends Affecting Romidepsin

Trend Implication
Gold-standard pathway for rare tumor drugs May facilitate accelerated approval for new indications
Pricing pressures from healthcare authorities Necessitate demonstrating high clinical value
Increasing focus on combination therapies Opportunities for co-approval and label expansion

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary growth drivers for Romidepsin in the next five years?
A1: Expansion into new lymphoma subtypes, positive clinical trial results for combination therapies, and geographic market penetration, particularly in Europe and Asia.

Q2: How significant is competition from other HDAC inhibitors?
A2: Currently moderate; Romidepsin holds a leadership position in T-cell lymphoma therapy, but competition from belinostat and emerging agents could erode market share.

Q3: What regulatory challenges could impact Romidepsin’s growth?
A3: Delays in approval for new indications, biosimilar entry post-patent expiry, and reimbursement hurdles could slow revenue growth.

Q4: Are there prospects for Romidepsin in non-oncology indications?
A4: While primarily an oncology agent, research in epigenetic modulation for other diseases remains experimental; commercial prospects remain limited unless new data emerge.

Q5: What are the key pharmacoeconomic considerations for investors?
A5: High treatment costs coupled with demonstrated clinical benefit can justify pricing and reimbursement, but market access depends on value demonstration amidst healthcare cost containment.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Potential: Romidepsin’s current value centers on its niche role in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphomas, with significant upside through pipeline expansion and label extensions.
  • Competitive Edge: Its status as a first-in-class HDAC inhibitor grants a strong foothold, but continued innovation and combination strategies are required to maintain dominance.
  • Financial Trajectory: Revenue growth projections hinge on clinical success, regulatory approvals, and market expansion; targeted at doubling revenue over five years with risk-adjusted probabilities.
  • Investment Risks: Patent expiration, emerging competitors, and reimbursement hurdles form major concerns.
  • Strategic Recommendation: Early engagement with pipeline developments and potential partnerships can mitigate risks and capitalize on unmet market needs.

References

[1] Market Research Future, “Global Hematologic Malignancies Market,” 2023.
[2] Bristol-Myers Squibb Annual Report, 2023.
[3] FDA Drug Approvals Database, 2011-2014.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682602, NCT02273437.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.