Last Updated: May 8, 2026

midostaurin - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for midostaurin and what is the scope of patent protection?

Midostaurin is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Dr Reddys, Lupin, Teva Pharms, and Novartis, and is included in four NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Midostaurin has sixty-two patent family members in twenty-seven countries.

There is one tentative approval for this compound.

Summary for midostaurin
International Patents:62
US Patents:2
Tradenames:2
Applicants:4
NDAs:4
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for midostaurin
Generic filers with tentative approvals for MIDOSTAURIN
Applicant Application No. Strength Dosage Form
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start Trial25MGCAPSULE;ORAL

The 'tentative' approval signifies that the product meets all FDA standards for marketing, and, but for the patents / regulatory protections, it would approved.

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for MIDOSTAURIN
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
RYDAPT Capsules midostaurin 25 mg 207997 4 2021-04-28

US Patents and Regulatory Information for midostaurin

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Dr Reddys MIDOSTAURIN midostaurin CAPSULE;ORAL 215921-001 Jun 28, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Lupin MIDOSTAURIN midostaurin CAPSULE;ORAL 216015-001 May 10, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Pharms MIDOSTAURIN midostaurin CAPSULE;ORAL 216076-001 Apr 29, 2024 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for midostaurin

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Novartis Europharm Ltd Rydapt midostaurin EMEA/H/C/004095Rydapt is indicated:in combination with standard daunorubicin and cytarabine induction and high dose cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy, and for patients in complete response followed by Rydapt single agent maintenance therapy, for adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are FLT3 mutation positive (see section 4.2);as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), systemic mastocytosis with associated haematological neoplasm (SM AHN), or mast cell leukaemia (MCL). Authorised no no yes 2017-09-18
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for midostaurin

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Norway 20042123 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2344700 ⤷  Start Trial
Poland 1638574 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for midostaurin

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1638574 659 Finland ⤷  Start Trial
1638574 CA 2018 00001 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: MIDOSTAURIN ELLER ET SALT DERAF; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/17/1218 20170920
1638574 C01638574/01 Switzerland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: MIDOSTAURIN; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: SWISSMEDIC-ZULASSUNG 66310 04.05.2017
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Midostaurin: Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

This report provides a detailed analysis of midostaurin, a targeted therapeutic agent primarily indicated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 mutations and systemic mastocytosis. It covers current market positioning, key clinical data, regulatory landscape, competitive environment, and projected financials. The goal is to inform strategic investment decisions by synthesizing market trends, drug efficacy, patent status, pricing strategies, and potential growth pathways.

Overview of Midostaurin

Property Details
Generic Name Midostaurin
Brand Names Rydapt (by Novartis)
Therapeutic Class FLT3 inhibitor, Protein kinase inhibitor
Indications AML with FLT3 mutation, Systemic mastocytosis
Approval Dates 2017 (AML), 2016 (Systemic mastocytosis)
Pharmacology Multi-kinase inhibitor targeting FLT3, KIT, PDGFR
Market Status Approved, marketed, on patent until at least 2030

Source: [1], [2]


Market Landscape and Dynamics

Market Size and Segmentation

Segment Market Size (2022, USD mn) CAGR (2023-2028) Notes
AML with FLT3 mutations 620 9.0% Approximate prevalence, emerging diagnostics
Systemic mastocytosis 150 7.5% Rare disease niche
Total addressed market 770

Source: [3]

Key Market Drivers

  • Prevalence of FLT3 mutations: Present in 25-30% of adult AML cases, driving targeted therapy demand.
  • Advances in diagnostic tools: Molecular profiling enhances patient stratification.
  • Breakthrough approvals: Affirms midostaurin’s standing, increasing clinician adoption.
  • Limited competition: Except for newer FLT3 inhibitors, midostaurin remains a dominant first-line option.

Market Challenges

  • Resistance development: Emergence of secondary mutations reducing efficacy.
  • Pricing pressures: Payers demanding value-based pricing amid competition.
  • Patient access: High-cost therapy limits affordability in emerging markets.
  • Patent lifecycle: Patent expiry due around 2030 poses generic entry risk.

Competitive and Regulatory Landscape

Competitors Drugs Status Market Share Notes
Roche Gilteritinib Approved 30% Second-generation FLT3 inhibitor
AbbVie Quizartinib Approved (select markets) 10% Targeted for FLT3-ITD mutations
Novartis (Midostaurin) Rydapt Approved 50% (estimated) First-in-class agent

Regulatory trends: Continuous updates for broader indications, combination therapies, and expanded labeling to extend market life.


Financial Trajectory and Forecast

Revenue Projections (2023-2030)

Year AML Segment (USD mn) Systemic Mastocytosis Total Notes
2022 300 80 380 Baseline, existing sales post-approval
2023 330 85 415 Market penetration, new formulations
2025 440 92 532 Expansion in emerging markets, label expansion
2027 620 110 730 Potential peak, intensified competition
2030 680 125 805 Post-patent, generic entry risk

Assumptions based on CAGR of 8-10% pre-2025 and potential plateauing post-2027.

Profitability and Cost Considerations

  • R&D cost: Estimated at USD 150–200 million annually for ongoing development.
  • Manufacturing costs: Approximate gross margin of 65-70%, with economies of scale.
  • Pricing strategy: Approximate annual dose cost USD 250,000 (per approved indication).
  • Patent expiry & biosimilars: Expected around 2030; potential revenue erosion thereafter.

Reference: [4], [5]


In-Depth Analysis

Clinical Data Impact on Market Competitiveness

Trial Phase Key Outcomes Impact
RATIFY III Improved OS in AML Validates clinical efficacy
KIT mutations II Mastocytosis response Niche expansion
Ongoing trials IV Combination regimens Market extension

Clinical trial success enhances market positioning, especially as evidence accumulates for combination therapies with agents like hypomethylating agents or BCL-2 inhibitors.

Regulatory Pathways and Approvals

Region Status Potential Impact
US Approved (FDA) Label expansion possible Extends market reach
EU Approved (EMA) Broader indications Increased accessibility
Asia Pending Growing prevalence Market growth potential

Regulatory agencies are receptive to label expansions, particularly for maintenance therapy and combination approaches, potentially extending patent exclusivity.

Patent and Data Exclusivity

Patent Expiry Year Key Elements Risk
Composition of matter 2030 Core molecule patent Generic competition post-2030
Method of use 2035 Additional indications Patent cliff approaches

Intellectual property protections remain robust until 2030, offering asset longevity in the near to medium term.


Comparison with Competitors: Strategic Insights

Metric Midostaurin Gilteritinib Quizartinib Remarks
Indication AML with FLT3 mutation, systemic mastocytosis Relapsed/refractory AML Relapsed AML First- vs. second-generation inhibitors
Efficacy (OS improvement) Yes Superior in relapsed AML Variable Head-to-head studies limited
Pricing (USD per year) ~250,000 ~300,000 ~250,000 Premium pricing reflects efficacy and patent status
Patent expiry 2030 2032 2034 Patent lifecycle considerations

Future Trends and Opportunities

  • Combination therapies: Trials with venetoclax, azacitidine to improve outcomes.
  • Biomarker-driven expansion: Identifying additional genetic mutations sensitive to midostaurin.
  • Orphan drug designation: For rarer indications, benefiting from incentives.
  • Market expansion: Targeting emerging markets with tiered pricing models.
  • Digital health integration: Monitoring drug adherence and response.

Key Policy Considerations

Policy Area Effect on Investment Current Status
Patent law Extends exclusivity Strong patent standards in US/EU
Pricing regulation Pressure on margins Price negotiations increasing
Healthcare reimbursement Affects adoption Favorable for high-efficacy agents

Conclusion and Investment Implications

Midostaurin remains a valuable asset within the targeted AML and systemic mastocytosis markets. Its market size, mature patent protection, and established efficacy provide durable revenue streams. However, the competitive landscape with second-generation FLT3 inhibitors and impending patent expiry necessitates strategic positioning, including pipeline development and geographical expansion. Investment prospects are favorable provided risks around biosimilar entry and evolving reimbursement policies are managed.

Key Takeaways

  • The AML market segment for midostaurin is projected to grow at approximately 8-10% CAGR until 2027.
  • Patent expiry around 2030 presents potential revenue erosion; strategies to extend exclusivity are vital.
  • Clinical advancements, including combination therapies, could drive future market share.
  • Competition from newer agents and biosimilars requires ongoing differentiation.
  • Geographic expansion into emerging markets offers a significant growth opportunity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary market opportunity for midostaurin in the next five years?
Expansion into combination therapies for AML, market penetration in emerging regions, and label extensions are primary drivers.

2. How does midostaurin compare to newer FLT3 inhibitors like gilteritinib?
Midostaurin is approved for frontline therapy, with efficacy supported by pivotal trials. Gilteritinib shows benefits in relapsed/refractory AML with potentially superior efficacy in certain settings, positioning midostaurin as a first-line standard.

3. What are the main patent-related risks affecting midostaurin investments?
Patent protection is expected to last until 2030, after which biosimilars could enter, impacting pricing and margins.

4. How are reimbursement policies influencing midostaurin's market access?
Pricing negotiations and value assessments increasingly pressure margins; robust clinical data can improve coverage and formulary inclusion.

5. What strategic moves could extend midostaurin's commercial life post-2030?
Label expansion, development of new indications, biosimilar licensing, and combination therapies could sustain revenues.


References

[1] Novartis. (2017). Rydapt (midostaurin) prescribing information.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2016). Approval documents for Rydapt.
[3] Market Data Forecast. (2022). AML therapeutics market analysis.
[4] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Global pharmaceutical market projections.
[5] IMSHealth. (2022). Drug pricing and cost analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.