Last Updated: May 3, 2026

ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium and what is the scope of patent protection?

Ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Guerbet and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Guerbet HEXABRIX ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018905-002 Jul 26, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Guerbet HEXABRIX ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018905-002 Jul 26, 1985 4,065,554 ⤷  Start Trial
Guerbet HEXABRIX ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018905-002 Jul 26, 1985 4,014,986 ⤷  Start Trial
Guerbet HEXABRIX ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018905-002 Jul 26, 1985 4,094,966 ⤷  Start Trial
Guerbet HEXABRIX ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018905-002 Jul 26, 1985 4,065,553 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Ioxaglate meglumine; ioxaglate sodium Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 3, 2026

What Is the Market Position of Ioxaglate Meglumine and Ioxaglate Sodium?

Ioxaglate meglumine and ioxaglate sodium are contrast agents used in medical imaging, primarily in angiography and radiography to enhance vessel and tissue visibility. Both are non-ionic, iodine-based radiographic contrast media. They serve similar roles but differ in formulation—meglumine and sodium are stabilizing agents. Their market presence remains niche due to specific utilization in diagnostic procedures and competition from other iodinated contrast agents.

What Is the Patent and Regulatory Landscape?

Both compounds are off-patent globally. Ioxaglate was developed in the 1980s, with several generic versions approved across various jurisdictions. In the U.S., the FDA approved ioxaglate in 1986 via NDA (New Drug Application). Globally, regulatory agencies like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Health Canada have similarly authorized generic manufacturing.

Key regulatory considerations:

  • Lack of patent protection reduces R&D barriers for generic producers.
  • The expiration of exclusivity allows market entry for competitors, pressuring prices.
  • Market approval hinges on demonstrating safety, efficacy, and manufacturing compliance.

What Are the Production and Supply Chain Fundamentals?

Manufacturing involves complex organic synthesis and iodine-based compounds' stabilization. Many generic producers rely on established, scalable chemical synthesis pathways. Supply chain stability depends on sourcing high-purity iodine and other key intermediates.

Supply chain vulnerabilities might include:

  • Iodine market volatility.
  • Regulatory compliance costs.
  • Capacity limitations among early-entrant firms.

What Are the Key Market Dynamics and Competition?

The global contrast media market was valued at approximately USD 2.7 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow modestly at around 3% annually through 2030 [1]. Market share distribution is tightly controlled by a handful of companies, with GE Healthcare, Bayer HealthCare, and Siemens Healthineers as dominant players.

Major competitors for ioxaglate include:

  • Iohexol (Omnipaque): Higher safety profile and broader FDA approval.
  • Iodixanol (Visipaque): Iso-osmolar, reducing adverse reactions.
  • Other traditional iodinated contrast agents.

Market dynamics favor agents with proven safety profiles, broad regulatory approvals, and established provider relationships. Cost sensitivity influences substitution and generic uptake.

What Are the Investment Fundamentals?

Financial viability depends on several factors:

  • Market Penetration: Ioxaglate's niche use limits growth; attracting new users is challenging due to existing preferred agents.
  • Pricing pressures: Generics compete primarily on price; margins diminish with increased generic competition.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Ensuring compliance remains costly but less so for off-patent drugs.
  • Manufacturing scale: Larger-scale operations benefit from economies of scale, but initial capital doesn't require extensive R&D investments.
  • Distribution channels: Established relationships with healthcare providers favor incumbents; entering new markets requires significant marketing efforts.

Given these constraints, investing in companies manufacturing generic contrast agents demands recognition of narrow margins and market saturation risks.

What Are the Strategic Opportunities and Risks?

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into emerging markets with less regulatory stringency.
  • Diversification into alternative contrast media or combination products.
  • Licensing agreements with large pharmaceutical companies for branded formulations.

Risks:

  • Sudden regulatory bans or restrictions due to adverse event reports.
  • Switching preferences toward MRI-based imaging reduces demand for iodinated contrast.
  • Price wars among generic manufacturers threaten margins.

What Is the Regulatory Outlook and Future Prospects?

Regulatory agencies increasingly prioritize patient safety, leading to tighter control over contrast agent formulations. Future approval pathways might favor agents with improved safety profiles. Innovations in contrast media with lower iodine doses or reduced nephrotoxicity might eclipse existing iodine-based compounds.

Summary of Investment Considerations

  • The patent landscape favors generics; entry barriers are low.
  • Competition is intense, with price-driven markets.
  • Growth prospects are limited given the mature market and the advent of alternative imaging technologies.
  • Companies with existing manufacturing infrastructure and global distribution channels can leverage small market segments.

Key Takeaways

  • Ioxaglate meglumine and sodium are off-patent contrast agents with limited growth prospects.
  • Market share is held by a few large firms, with generics competing strictly on price.
  • The global contrast media market remains steady, but aggressive price competition limits profitability.
  • Technological shifts toward MRI imaging threaten the long-term demand.
  • Investment in this segment favors firms with low production costs, global reach, and diversification strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary use of ioxaglate meglumine and sodium?
They are used as iodine-based contrast agents in X-ray and angiography procedures to improve imaging of blood vessels and tissues.

2. Are these compounds still patent-protected?
No. Their patents expired decades ago, allowing generic manufacturing in most jurisdictions.

3. What competitive advantages can manufacturers of these agents pursue?
Achieving cost efficiencies, expanding into emerging markets, and securing supply agreements facilitate competitiveness.

4. What factors threaten the long-term viability of iodine-based contrast agents?
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), safety concerns, and regulatory pressures can diminish demand.

5. Where are growth opportunities for related contrast media?
Medical imaging innovation, including ultra-low iodine dose agents, and expansion into regions with lower regulatory barriers provide growth potential.

References

[1] MarketsandMarkets. "Contrast Media Market by Type, Application, and Region - Global Forecast to 2030." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.