Last Updated: May 3, 2026

haloprogin - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for haloprogin and what is the scope of patent protection?

Haloprogin is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Westwood Squibb and is included in two NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for haloprogin
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for haloprogin

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Westwood Squibb HALOTEX haloprogin CREAM;TOPICAL 016942-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Westwood Squibb HALOTEX haloprogin SOLUTION;TOPICAL 016943-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis for Haloprogin

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is Haloprogin?

Haloprogin is an antifungal agent originally developed to treat skin infections such as tinea corporis and tinea pedis. It was introduced in the 1960s but eventually phased out from the market due to limited efficacy and safety concerns. Currently, it is not marketed, and no active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) sales or commercial products are available.

Market and Regulatory Status

Aspect Details
Approval Status Approved in the US (1970s-1980s); withdrawn from U.S. market circa 1985
Current Market Presence Absent; no marketed formulations or authorized generic competitors
Regulatory Pathways No recent regulatory filings or approvals; potential for re-evaluation
Patent Landscape No active patents; original patents expired decades ago

Pharmacological Profile and Fundamentals

  • Mechanism of Action: Disrupts fungal cell membrane synthesis by interfering with sterol production.
  • Spectrum of Activity: Effective against dermatophytes; limited data on yeast or mold fungi.
  • Toxicity Profile: Reports of skin irritation; safety concerns from outdated trials.
  • Formulation: Topical cream, ointment; no current formulations available.

Commercial and Competitive Landscape

  • Existing Drugs: Terbinafine, clotrimazole, miconazole dominate the topical antifungal market.
  • Market Revenue: Estimated global antifungal market in 2022 was approximately USD 11 billion; OTC segments constitute the majority.
  • Market Entry Barriers:
    • No current patent protection.
    • Outdated safety and efficacy data.
    • Established competition with superior safety profiles.

Investment Considerations

Factor Analysis
Market Potential Low for reintroduction; saturated with well-established molecules and OTC options
Development Costs High, including reformulation, preclinical testing, safety, and efficacy studies
Regulatory Challenges Significant; need for new clinical trials and safety data to regain approval
Patent and IP Landscape No active patents; potential for new formulation patents but limited exclusivity
Commercial Viability Questionable; likelihood of rapid obsolescence given existing competition

Risks and Challenges

  • Efficacy and Safety: Sufficiently outdated; requires comprehensive re-evaluation.
  • Regulatory Approval: Uncertain; might necessitate phase I/II trials.
  • Market Acceptance: Limited, given strong existing medications and OTC options.
  • Manufacturing: Need for modern formulation development and stability testing.

Opportunities

  • Niche Repositioning: Could develop for resistant fungal strains if demonstrated to be superior.
  • Patent Opportunities: Novel formulations or drug delivery systems.
  • Combination Therapy: Potential synergy with other antifungals.

Summary

Investing in re-developing haloprogin presents high scientific and regulatory risks with limited potential for competitive advantage. The existing market is saturated with better-tolerated, well-studied antifungals, reducing the likelihood of commercial success. Strategic focus should shift toward developing novel antifungal agents or repositioning drugs with current patent protection and better safety profiles.

Key Takeaways

  • No current market or regulatory pathway exists for haloprogin in its original form.
  • The antifungal market is highly competitive, dominated by molecules with proven safety and efficacy.
  • Significant investment would be required to develop safety data, formulations, and obtain regulatory approval.
  • The absence of patent protection limits exclusivity potential.
  • Market entry risks outweigh potential benefits, barring innovative repositioning or combination strategies.

FAQs

  1. Can haloprogin be repurposed for resistant fungal strains?
    Current data do not support efficacy against resistant strains; extensive research and trials are necessary.

  2. Are there ongoing clinical trials involving haloprogin?
    No recent initiatives or clinical trials are publicly documented.

  3. What regulatory hurdles exist for reintroducing haloprogin?
    Reintroduction would require new safety and efficacy data, including phase I/II trials and regulatory review.

  4. What are competitors' advantages over haloprogin?
    Better safety profiles, existing formulations, and widespread OTC availability.

  5. Could patenting new formulations revive haloprogin?
    Only if novel delivery systems or formulations meet patent criteria; otherwise, limited market exclusivity.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1985). History of antifungal agents. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov.
[2] MarketWatch. (2022). Global antifungal market overview.
[3] PatentScope. (2023). Patent landscape for topical antifungal agents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.