You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Lilly and is included in two NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Lilly CORDRAN N flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate CREAM;TOPICAL 050346-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Lilly CORDRAN N flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate OINTMENT;TOPICAL 050345-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Flurandrenolide; neomycin sulfate Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 16, 2026

Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis: Flurandrenolide and Neomycin Sulfate

Overview

Flurandrenolide and neomycin sulfate are combined in topical formulations primarily used for dermatological conditions. Flurandrenolide is a potent corticosteroid, reducing inflammation, whereas neomycin sulfate is an aminoglycoside antibiotic. The combination addresses inflammatory and bacterial skin conditions with significant market applications in dermatology, wound care, and eczema treatment.

Market Overview and Demand Drivers

Market Size and Growth:

  • The global dermatology market was valued at approximately USD 21 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9.2% through 2030 [1].
  • Topical corticosteroids and antibiotics like neomycin sulfate are key segments within this market, driven by rising prevalence of skin diseases and increasing chronic skin conditions such as eczema, psoriasis, and bacterial skin infections.

Regulatory Landscape:

  • Flurandrenolide is approved in various markets for topical application but faces regulatory scrutiny regarding potency and safety profiles, particularly for long-term use.
  • Neomycin sulfate has licensed formulations globally but is associated with allergic contact dermatitis risks, leading to cautious prescribing and regulatory monitoring.
  • Combination products require regulatory approval for each indication and must demonstrate safety, efficacy, and manufacturing quality.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Several topical corticosteroid and antibiotic products dominate the market, including brands like Elocon (mometasone) and Neosporin (neomycin-polymyxin B-bacitracin).
  • Patent expiration of key competitors and the rise of generic formulations present opportunities for entry but heighten price competition.

Patent and IP Rights:

  • As of 2023, there are no active patents protecting the specific combination of flurandrenolide and neomycin sulfate, allowing generic manufacturers to enter the market.
  • Innovative formulations (e.g., controlled-release, novel delivery systems) could provide patent protection and market differentiation.

Investment Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities:

  • Launch of generic formulations upon patent expiry.
  • Development of combination products with improved safety profiles or novel delivery mechanisms.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with increasing healthcare access and rising dermatology disease burdens.

Risks:

  • Regulatory delays or rejections owing to safety concerns, especially regarding neomycin-associated ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
  • Market saturation with existing generic and branded products.
  • Risk associated with adverse reactions leading to recall or restricted use, especially with long-term topical corticosteroid therapy.

Clinical and Regulatory Considerations

Clinical Efficacy:

  • Demonstrates effectiveness in reducing inflammation and bacterial load in dermatological infections.
  • Long-term safety data are limited; side effects include skin atrophy, systemic absorption, and allergic reactions.

Regulatory Pathways:

  • Requires submission of New Drug Applications (NDAs) or Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for generics.
  • Post-marketing surveillance essential due to the potential adverse effects linked to both components.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain

  • Raw material sourcing for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • Quality control aligned with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
  • Supply chain stability critical for market competitiveness, particularly for active ingredients with limited supplier pools.

Financial Projections

Parameter Expected Range Notes
Market Entry Costs USD 20-50 million Includes R&D, regulatory fees, manufacturing setup.
Pricing Strategy USD 10-20 per tube Prices depend on formulation strength, brand positioning, and market segment.
Break-even Point 3-4 years Given generic competition, margin adjustments are necessary for rapid market penetration.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Pursue formulation innovation with patent protection.
  • Engage early with regulators to streamline approval.
  • Focus on markets with high dermatology disease burden and limited existing treatment options.
  • Establish robust supply chain arrangements for active ingredients.

Key Takeaways

  • The market for topical corticosteroid and antibiotic combinations is competitive with significant growth prospects but faces regulatory and patent challenges.
  • Rising prevalence of dermatological conditions in developed and emerging markets facilitates demand but increases price and market competition.
  • Entry strategies should leverage formulation patents, cost-effective manufacturing, and targeted geographic expansion.
  • Regulatory approval hinges on demonstrating safety, particularly concerning neomycin-related adverse events.
  • Investment returns depend on speed of market entry, pricing, and the ability to carve out differentiation in a crowded space.

FAQs

1. What are the main regulatory hurdles for combination formulations of flurandrenolide and neomycin sulfate?
Approval requires demonstrating combined safety and efficacy, especially regarding corticosteroid side effects and neomycin's potential toxicity, which can extend review timelines and increase development costs.

2. How does patent expiration influence the market viability of these drugs?
Patent expiry opens the market for generics, increasing competition, but also diminishes exclusivity, forcing lower prices and squeezing profit margins unless proprietary formulations are developed.

3. What safety concerns are associated with neomycin sulfate?
Risk of allergic contact dermatitis, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity, particularly with prolonged use or systemic absorption.

4. Which regions represent the best opportunities for market entry?
Emerging markets with rising dermatologic disease burden and growing healthcare infrastructure, such as India, Brazil, and Southeast Asia.

5. Are there innovative formulations that could enhance the product's market appeal?
Yes, controlled-release formulations, topical gels, or emulsion-based systems can reduce side effects and improve patient compliance, supporting patent protection.


References

  1. Market Research Future. (2022). Global Dermatology Market Outlook.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Regulatory Review of Topical Corticosteroids.
  3. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Neomycin sulfate safety overview.
  4. IQVIA. (2023). Dermatology Product Market Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.