Last Updated: August 2, 2026

diflunisal - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for diflunisal and what is the scope of patent protection?

Diflunisal is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Ani Pharms, Dastech Intl, Heritage Pharma, Purepac Pharm, Teva, Watson Labs, Zydus Pharms, and Merck, and is included in ten NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for diflunisal
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:8
NDAs:10

US Patents and Regulatory Information for diflunisal

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ani Pharms DIFLUNISAL diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 074604-001 Jun 10, 1996 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dastech Intl DIFLUNISAL diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 073562-001 Nov 27, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dastech Intl DIFLUNISAL diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 073563-001 Nov 27, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for diflunisal

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Merck DOLOBID diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 018445-001 Apr 19, 1982 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Merck DOLOBID diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 018445-002 Apr 19, 1982 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Merck DOLOBID diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 018445-002 Apr 19, 1982 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration
Last updated: February 15, 2026

What is Diflunisal and How Is It Positioned in the Market?

Diflunisal is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used mainly for pain relief, arthritis, and other inflammatory conditions. It is a salicylate derivative with a longer half-life than aspirin, allowing twice-daily dosing. Originally approved by the FDA in 1983, it is marketed under brand names such as Dolobid.

The drug's primary indication covers rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) in specific contexts. Its patent expired in 2000, making it available in generic form.

In the current landscape, diflunisal primarily faces competition from other NSAIDs like ibuprofen, naproxen, and diclofenac. In recent years, off-label uses, particularly in FAP, have gained scientific interest, positioning diflunisal as a candidate for alternative or adjunctive therapy in rare diseases.

What Are the Key Market Dynamics and Investment Drivers?

Market Size and Revenue Potential

The global NSAID market, valued at approximately $20 billion in 2022, is mature but shows growth potential in niches like rare diseases and opioid-sparing pain management.

Diflunisal's primary niche: familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). This rare genetic condition has limited treatments. Tafamidis, a drug approved for FAP, generated over $0.3 billion in sales globally in 2022. While diflunisal itself is off-label for FAP, clinical trials suggest its potential as an affordable alternative.

Patent Status and Competitive Landscape

From a patent perspective, diflunisal’s original patents expired in 2000. However, new formulations or combinations can still carry patent protections. Competitors include generic NSAIDs with established efficacy and safety profiles.

Off-Label and Investigational Uses

Research studies demonstrate diflunisal's capacity to stabilize amyloidogenic transthyretin proteins, delaying FAP progression. This has spurred interest in repurposing, supported by a favorable safety profile and low cost.

Regulatory Status and Market Access

Limited by its off-label status for FAP, diflunisal lacks formal regulatory approval for this indication. Nevertheless, expanded clinical evidence could facilitate off-label prescribing and insurance reimbursement.

Commercialization Challenges

Weak patent protections limit pricing power. Small patient population in rare diseases constrains revenue unless market access expands. Manufacturing costs are low due to generic availability, but clinical development and regulatory approval for new indications demand investment.

What Are the R&D and Regulatory Pathways?

Clinical Development

Phase 2/3 trials have demonstrated the drug’s potential for delaying disease progression in FAP. Moving toward formal approval would require controlled studies, which carry costs estimated in the tens of millions of dollars.

Regulatory Strategy

Seeking orphan drug designation could confer benefits like market exclusivity for seven years upon approval, easing competitive pressure. Fast-track or breakthrough therapy designations may also accelerate approval processes.

Intellectual Property

Unless new formulations or delivery methods are developed, patent protections for diflunisal are unlikely to extend beyond the original expiration date. Patent filings related to novel uses could provide some exclusivity.

What Are the Investment Risks?

  • Regulatory risk: Differences in regulatory acceptance for off-label uses and the need for new approvals.
  • Market risk: Limited patient population and reimbursement challenges.
  • Competitive risk: Dominant presence of established NSAIDs and the potential for new drugs targeting similar pathways.
  • Clinical risk: Evidence for efficacy in FAP remains limited; larger trials are necessary to confirm benefits.

What Is the Financial Outlook?

Investment potential depends heavily on clinical success and regulatory approval. If successful, diflunisal could command a premium as a disease-modifying therapy in FAP—potentially reaching sales in the hundreds of millions annually. However, the current off-label status and limited indications restrict near-term revenue.

Key Takeaways

  • Diflunisal is a generic NSAID with established safety and low manufacturing costs.
  • Its niche prospects lie in rare disease therapy, notably familial amyloid polyneuropathy.
  • Clinical evidence supports its potential to modify disease progression, but regulatory approval for this indication remains necessary.
  • Market expansion is limited by the small patient population and competitive landscape dominated by newer agents.
  • Strategic pathways include orphan drug designation, clinical trial expansion, and formulation innovation.

FAQs

1. Can diflunisal be commercially developed as a treatment for FAP?
Yes. It would require clinical trials to validate efficacy, and pursuing orphan drug designation could provide exclusivity incentives.

2. What are the main hurdles in repurposing diflunisal for new indications?
Limited evidence from large, randomized trials and lack of regulatory approval for the new use restrict commercial viability.

3. How does the patent landscape influence investment?
Patent expirations in 2000 mean generic competition limits pricing. New formulations or indications may enable patent protections, attracting investment.

4. Which regulatory pathways could facilitate market entry?
Orphan drug designation, accelerated approval pathways, and breakthrough therapy designations could expedite access and provide market exclusivity.

5. How does competition from other NSAIDs impact development prospects?
High competition and mature markets for NSAIDs limit the attractiveness unless the drug addresses a niche unmet need like FAP.


Sources

[1] MarketWatch, "NSAID Market Size & Forecast," 2022.
[2] FDA, Diflunisal approval history.
[3] Scientific literature on diflunisal’s role in FAP.
[4] EvaluatePharma, "Top-selling rare disease drugs," 2022.
[5] ClinicalTrials.gov, "Diflunisal in FAP trials," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.