Last Updated: May 3, 2026

cimetidine hydrochloride - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for cimetidine hydrochloride and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Cimetidine hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in four branded drugs marketed by Cosette, Hospira, Luitpold, Ph Health, Teva Parenteral, Glaxosmithkline, Ani Pharms, Chartwell Molecular, Cycle, G And W Labs Inc, Pai Holdings Pharm, Pharm Assoc, and Pharmobedient Cnsltg, and is included in twenty-four NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for cimetidine hydrochloride
US Patents:0
Tradenames:4
Applicants:13
NDAs:24

US Patents and Regulatory Information for cimetidine hydrochloride

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Cosette CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074296-001 Mar 28, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074344-001 Jan 31, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074345-001 Jan 31, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074412-001 Mar 28, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074422-001 Jan 31, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Luitpold CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074353-001 Dec 20, 1994 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ph Health CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE cimetidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074005-001 Aug 31, 1994 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for cimetidine hydrochloride

CIMETIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE: Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 23, 2026

What is cimetidine hydrochloride, and where does it sit in the drug landscape?

Cimetidine hydrochloride is a first-generation histamine H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) used to reduce gastric acid secretion. It is a mature, off-patent molecule in most major jurisdictions, with the investable opportunity typically concentrated in (1) low-cost manufacturing scale, (2) supply-chain reliability and regulatory compliance, and (3) formulation differentiation in generics and authorized generics rather than brand-level innovation.

Core positioning:

  • Pharmacology class: H2RA (histamine H2 receptor blocker)
  • Therapeutic area: acid-related gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., GERD, dyspepsia, ulcer conditions)
  • Commercial profile: legacy molecule with high generics penetration and strong price competition

What drives fundamentals for cimetidine hydrochloride businesses?

Fundamentals for cimetidine hydrochloride are governed by generic economics and manufacturing execution more than novel IP. The main investment drivers are cost per unit, throughput, quality systems, and regulatory throughput across markets.

Key fundamental drivers

  1. Generic market economics

    • Mature molecule with established demand but pressure from low-cost entrants.
    • Revenue sensitivity to price erosion, payer mix, and contract manufacturing terms.
  2. Manufacturing and compliance execution

    • H2RA tablets and liquid products require consistent dissolution and stability performance.
    • Customers prioritize supply continuity and low defect rates because reimbursement and distribution are contract-led.
  3. Regulatory posture and product lifecycle

    • Generics rely on maintaining approval status and minimizing changes that trigger re-approval risk (process changes, packaging, site transfers).
    • Post-approval variations (strength, excipients, coatings) can create cost and timing risk.
  4. Formulation and packaging differentiation

    • Where differentiation exists, it typically shows up in controlled-release, combination products, or dosing/packaging formats.
    • For most investors, this is a margin lever rather than a growth lever.

How does the patent/IP landscape shape the investment case?

Cimetidine hydrochloride is widely treated as an off-patent drug, which shifts the competitive center from exclusivity to manufacturing cost and regulatory speed. The investable “patent” angle for this molecule tends to live in:

  • specific formulation patents (rare and market-dependent),
  • process patents for certain salts, polymorphs, or impurity control strategies,
  • regulatory exclusivities around particular products (depends on jurisdiction),
  • authorized generic arrangements.

Because the molecule is foundational and long-established, IP value typically accrues to current-product owners only where they hold specific, still-active secondary rights in certain territories or for specific product configurations.

What evidence-based regulatory and standard-setting anchors matter?

For investment screening and due diligence, three sources matter: FDA labeling references for dosage and safety context; FDA drug product data for product structure and approval history; and pharmacopoeial/standard references for manufacturing and quality requirements.

US FDA anchors (practical due diligence)

  • Drug labeling record and composition context: FDA’s “Drugs@FDA” database is the starting point for marketed product details and approval history. [1]
  • Safety and efficacy communication: FDA labeling indicates the accepted indications and dosing framework for current products, which affects demand stability for generic equivalents. [1]

For manufacturing and quality due diligence:

  • Pharmacopoeial specifications (e.g., USP monographs where applicable) govern identity, assay, impurities, and dissolution behavior. These specifications are the basis for batch release and compliance risk. (Pharmacopoeial references are typically product-specific and must align to the labeled dosage form.)

Market fundamentals: where revenue tends to come from

For a legacy H2RA like cimetidine hydrochloride, the market tends to split across:

  • Retail and PBM channel generic demand for tablet strengths and common pack sizes.
  • Institutional demand in GI and inpatient formularies, often subject to substitution and pharmacy policy cycles.
  • OTC vs Rx distinction where applicable by jurisdiction and product status (depends on country-specific approvals and marketing authorization).

Typical demand patterns:

  • demand is stable to declining in countries where proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) displace H2RAs, but H2RAs retain use due to tolerability perceptions, cost, and patient-specific selection.
  • pricing is highly elastic; margin is primarily manufacturing-cost and contract-driven.

Competitive landscape: what you compete against

In generic H2RA categories, competition is usually characterized by:

  • multiple ANDA-approved (or local equivalent) manufacturers,
  • heavy price competition after each meaningful entry,
  • continuous pressure on unit economics due to procurement-driven contracting.

Investment implication:

  • The winners typically have the lowest sustainably manufacturable cost, strong compliance history, and the ability to sustain supply without recalls or rejection.

Manufacturing investment thesis: what to underwrite

A cimetidine hydrochloride investment case usually underwrites:

  • API sourcing and controls: impurity profile stability and consistent synthesis route performance.
  • Formulation process robustness: coating/dissolution and stability across lots and packaging.
  • Site readiness: FDA and EMA (or local) inspection readiness, including CAPA history and deviation rates.
  • Scalability: ability to run at volume without compromising dissolution, assay, and impurity limits.

Operational KPIs that matter in diligence:

  • batch failure and out-of-spec (OOS) rates,
  • deviation counts and closure timelines,
  • recall history and root-cause themes,
  • yield and conversion costs,
  • drug master file (DMF) quality and regulatory compatibility (where used).

Product strategy: where investors can find “edge”

Because the molecule is legacy, differentiation usually targets execution rather than breakthrough science.

Common strategy archetypes

  1. Cost-lead generic supply

    • Tight process control, optimized procurement, and scale capacity.
  2. Reliable contract manufacturing

    • Long-term supply agreements with mid-to-large generic partners.
  3. Niche formulation within the class

    • Limited markets for specific dosing forms or stability-optimized packages.
  4. Portfolio strategy across GI generics

    • Cross-selling synergies to reduce overhead and spread regulatory risk across multiple SKUs.

For investors, “edge” is rarely about clinical novelty and almost always about manufacturing and commercial execution.

Scenario analysis: investment outcomes under realistic market dynamics

The most investable dimension for legacy molecules is how management handles price erosion and supply continuity. Below are three outcome scenarios tied to measurable operational and market factors.

Base case (most common)

  • Unit demand stable, pricing declines gradually due to ongoing generic competition.
  • Margins hold near breakeven to low single digits if manufacturing costs and yields stay controlled.
  • Investment returns rely on supply volume growth through contracts rather than price increases.

What to watch:

  • stable approval status and no material regulatory disruptions,
  • consistent lot release rates,
  • contract coverage that prevents abrupt volume loss.

Downside case

  • A new low-cost competitor enters or expands distribution.
  • Pricing drops faster than cost reduction.
  • Quality events (OOS, deviations, or stability failures) trigger supply pauses.

What to watch:

  • ASP decline trend vs manufacturing cost curve,
  • deviation/OOS trend,
  • stability and dissolution performance over time.

Upside case

  • A company locks multi-year supply with major buyers.
  • Process improvement reduces unit cost faster than market price erosion.
  • The firm gains share through supply reliability during industry shortages.

What to watch:

  • contract renewal timing,
  • batch yield improvements and impurity reductions,
  • production availability and lead-time performance.

Risk register: what most often breaks economics

  1. Price erosion and buyer substitution

    • Generic procurement cycles reset pricing and can compress margins quickly.
  2. Regulatory and inspection risk

    • Site-level compliance issues can suspend supply regardless of market demand.
  3. Supply chain fragility

    • Single-source API risks and packaging lead-time constraints.
  4. Formulation change risk

    • Variation submissions can add timing and regulatory workload.
  5. Therapeutic substitution by PPIs

    • In markets where PPIs dominate, H2RA demand can structurally decline over time.

What does “investment-quality” diligence look like for cimetidine hydrochloride?

A credible diligence package focuses on product release and compliance history, not on clinical differentiation.

Minimum diligence elements:

  • Regulatory history: approval status and any warning letters tied to the product or site.
  • Batch release metrics: yields, OOS rates, trend charts on impurities.
  • Stability program outcomes: accelerated and long-term data compliance.
  • Process validation lifecycle: revalidation cadence and change control maturity.
  • Cost structure: API cost volatility, conversion costs, labor and energy intensity.

For investors, the question is whether management can defend supply and unit cost across multiple procurement cycles.

Key Takeaways

  • Cimetidine hydrochloride is a mature H2RA with economics driven by generic pricing, supply reliability, and manufacturing compliance, not primary IP.
  • Investment upside typically comes from cost leadership, contract supply wins, and operational excellence.
  • Downside risk concentrates in rapid price erosion and regulatory or quality events that interrupt supply.
  • The most actionable diligence targets are batch release performance, impurity control, stability outcomes, and inspection readiness, supported by FDA product records. [1]

FAQs

1) Is cimetidine hydrochloride a value-growth IP story?
No. The molecule is legacy; value typically comes from manufacturing scale, cost control, and regulatory execution rather than new exclusivity.

2) What is the primary business risk for generics of cimetidine?
Price compression from competitive entrants and procurement substitution, compounded by any quality events that stop shipments.

3) What diligence metrics matter most for this molecule?
Batch release consistency (OOS/OOT rates), impurity control trends, stability compliance, and site inspection history.

4) Where can investors find differentiation?
In operational reliability and formulation or packaging optimization that supports stable supply and margins, not in new clinical claims.

5) Which regulator database anchors product verification in the US?
FDA’s Drugs@FDA is the core reference point for marketed product and labeling/approval context. [1]


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.