Last Updated: August 2, 2026

calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Ge Healthcare and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ge Healthcare ISOPAQUE 280 calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017506-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis for Calcium; Meglumine; Metrizoic Acid

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What are the core attributes and current commercialization status of calcium-melumine-metrizoic acid formulations?

This compound combination primarily pertains to contrast media used in diagnostic imaging. Metrizoic acid is a radiopaque iodinated contrast agent, with calcium and meglumine as solubilizing agents. It is utilized in X-ray and computed tomography (CT) procedures. Market presence is concentrated in hospitals and diagnostic imaging centers, with limited direct pharmaceutical R&D activity due to the age of the compound class.

What are the market drivers influencing this compound’s investment potential?

Key market drivers include:

  • Growth in diagnostic imaging procedures, projected at CAGR 5.8% globally until 2028 (Source: MarketsandMarkets).
  • Shift to computed tomography (CT) and angiography, increasing demand for iodinated contrast agents.
  • Regulatory landscape is consolidating around safety and efficacy, limiting new entrants but elevating importance for reformulation or drug delivery innovations.
  • IP exclusivity for key patents expired decades ago, reducing R&D barriers but increasing competition from generics.
  • Limited pipeline innovation as current contrast media are well-established, with minimal recent advancement compared to newer gadolinium-based agents.

What are the core legal and patent considerations?

Most patents protecting iodinated contrast agents expired in the 1990s. Companies hold orphan drug or market exclusivity for specific formulations or delivery methods, but no significant patent barriers remain. Regulatory approvals are mostly generic or over-the-counter ready; new formulations require significant clinical data to gain approval.

How does safety profile influence investment prospects?

The safety profile of methylglucamine and calcium salts in contrast media is well-understood. Risks include nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions. Innovations targeting toxicity reduction or personalized imaging protocols could create niche markets, although regulatory hurdles are high, and the timeline for approval extends beyond typical R&D cycles.

What are the competitive dynamics?

Market dominance is held by a handful of companies, such as GE Healthcare, Bracco Imaging, and Bayer. These firms have extensive distribution channels and established relationships with healthcare providers. Entry barriers remain high due to drug familiarity and the high cost of clinical trials required for new indications or formulations.

What R&D activity characterizes this sector?

R&D investments are minimal; focus has shifted toward improving existing formulations' safety profile or extending indications. Several biotech startups explore nano-sized contrast agents for reduced toxicity, but these are in early development stages and are not directly linked to calcium, meglumine, or metrizoic acid.

What is the outlook for potential reformulation or new indications?

Innovations include formulations aimed at reducing allergic or nephrotoxic risks, as well as targeted delivery systems for molecular imaging. These require long development cycles, regulatory approval, and high investments, making them suitable for larger, well-funded companies rather than startups or small firms.

What are the main regulatory and market entry barriers?

  • Need for extensive clinical trials to demonstrate safety and efficacy.
  • Existing widespread use reduces the incentive for new entrants.
  • Regulatory environments favor generics over new formulations unless offering significant safety benefits.
  • Market penetration requires establishing relationships with hospitals and imaging centers, an entrenched competitive landscape.

Key Financial Metrics and Investment Considerations

Metric Value Notes
Market Size (2022) $1.2 billion Global iodinated contrast media market (Source: MarketsandMarkets)
CAGR (2023-2028) 5.8% Growth driven by rising imaging procedures
Patent Expiries 1990s No significant patent barriers
R&D Spend (per new agent) $50-100 million High regulatory and clinical trial costs
Generic Competition High Market dominated by existing manufacturers

Investment Risks

  • Regulatory hurdles for novel formulations or delivery methods.
  • Market saturation with existing contrast agents.
  • Potential safety concerns with reformulated drugs.
  • Limited pipeline innovation, reducing prospects for differentiation.

Conclusion

The market for calcium; meglumine; metrizoic acid is mature, with minimal new product development. Investment opportunities are primarily in companies focused on safety improvements, niche applications, or adjacent imaging technologies. Core drivers remain volume growth in imaging procedures, but high competition and regulatory barriers constrain significant upside.

Key Takeaways

  • The compound class has limited near-term innovation potential due to patent expiries and established market players.
  • Growth relies on increased diagnostic imaging volume, offset by market saturation.
  • Opportunities exist in safety-enhancing reformulations but face long, costly regulatory pathways.
  • The competitive landscape favors established firms with strong distribution networks.
  • Small firms or startups should focus on niche applications or adjunct technologies.

FAQs

1. Are new patents still being filed for contrast media like metrizoic acid?
No, most patents expired decades ago; recent filings focus on delivery systems or safety modifications rather than the active compound.

2. What is the typical timeline to bring a reformulated contrast agent to market?
Approximately 8-12 years, including preclinical testing, clinical trials, and regulatory review.

3. How significant is the risk of encountering adverse safety issues with existing contrast agents?
Moderate; nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions are known risks, but improvements have stabilized safety profiles over the past decades.

4. Which companies dominate the iodinated contrast agent market?
GE Healthcare, Bracco Imaging, Bayer. These companies hold extensive market share and distribution channels.

5. Is there a trend toward new imaging modalities replacing iodinated contrast media?
Yes; gadolinium-based agents and non-contrast imaging techniques are gaining ground, but iodinated agents remain essential for certain procedures.


References

  1. MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Contrast Media/Contrast Agents Market.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Approved Drugs with Patent Expiry Dates.
  3. European Medicines Agency. (2021). Guidelines on the evaluation of contrast agents.
  4. Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2020). Advances in Imaging with Contrast Agents. Journal of Medical Imaging, 7(3), 250–266.
  5. World Health Organization. (2022). Imaging Diagnostic Procedure Statistics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.