Last Updated: May 2, 2026

atazanavir sulfate - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for atazanavir sulfate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Atazanavir sulfate is the generic ingredient in three branded drugs marketed by Amneal, Aurobindo Pharma, Cipla, Hetero Labs Ltd Iii, Laurus, Mylan, Teva Pharms Usa, Zydus Pharms, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Bristol, and is included in eleven NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound and three Paragraph IV challenges. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are six tentative approvals for this compound.

Summary for atazanavir sulfate
Generic filers with tentative approvals for ATAZANAVIR SULFATE
Applicant Application No. Strength Dosage Form
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start Trial300MG/100MGTABLET; ORAL
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start Trial200MGCAPSULE; ORAL
⤷  Start Trial⤷  Start Trial150MGCAPSULE; ORAL

The 'tentative' approval signifies that the product meets all FDA standards for marketing, and, but for the patents / regulatory protections, it would approved.

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for ATAZANAVIR SULFATE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
REYATAZ Capsules atazanavir sulfate 100 mg and 150 mg 021567 1 2010-03-19
REYATAZ Capsules atazanavir sulfate 200 mg 021567 1 2010-02-16
REYATAZ Capsules atazanavir sulfate 300 mg 021567 1 2009-07-20

US Patents and Regulatory Information for atazanavir sulfate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Amneal ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 209717-001 Jun 1, 2020 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Amneal ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 209717-002 Jun 1, 2020 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Amneal ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 209717-003 Jun 1, 2020 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Amneal ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 209717-004 Jun 1, 2020 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 204806-001 Jun 25, 2018 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 204806-002 Jun 25, 2018 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma ATAZANAVIR SULFATE atazanavir sulfate CAPSULE;ORAL 204806-003 Jun 25, 2018 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for atazanavir sulfate

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma EEIG Reyataz atazanavir sulfate EMEA/H/C/000494Reyataz capsules, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, are indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infected adults and paediatric patients 6 years of age and older in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products (see section 4.2).Based on available virological and clinical data from adult patients, no benefit is expected in patients with strains resistant to multiple protease inhibitors (≥ 4 PI mutations).The choice of Reyataz in treatment experienced adult and paediatric patients should be based on individual viral resistance testing and the patient’s treatment history (see sections 4.4 and 5.1).Reyataz oral powder, co-administered with low dose ritonavir, is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products for the treatment of HIV-1 infected paediatric patients at least 3 months of age and weighing at least 5 kg (see section 4.2).Based on available virological and clinical data from adult patients, no benefit is expected in patients with strains resistant to multiple protease inhibitors ( 4 PI mutations). The choice of Reyataz in treatment experienced adult and paediatric patients should be based on individual viral resistance testing and the patient’s treatment history (see sections 4.4 and 5.1). Authorised no no no 2004-03-01
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

Atazanavir sulfate Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 4, 2026

What is the current market landscape for atazanavir sulfate?

Atazanavir sulfate, marketed primarily as Reyataz, is an HIV protease inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Its global sales peaked around $1.2 billion in 2019, with sales declining slightly since due to patent expirations and generic competition in key markets like the US and Europe. Despite generic entry, atazanavir maintains a niche owing to its once-daily dosing and favorable gastrointestinal profile compared to competitors like darunavir and ritonavir-boosted regimens.

What are the key patent and regulatory timelines?

The primary patent in the United States for Reyataz expired in August 2020, opening the door for generic competitors. However, secondary patents covering specific formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes extend exclusivity until 2025-2027 in certain jurisdictions, protecting market share temporarily.

Regulatory approvals are held in over 80 countries. The FDA approved atazanavir in 2003, with ongoing supplemental indications for age and weight-adjusted dosing. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted similar approvals, with some markets granting marketing authorization extensions based on additional clinical data.

What are the patent landscape and potential generic threats?

Patent expirations introduce significant risks for revenue decline. As of late 2022, generics have entered the US market following patent loss, leading to a sharp price decline estimated at 60–80%. Similar patterns occur in Europe, India, and other markets, with some generic entrants awaiting multiple patent challenges.

Branded manufacturers and patent holders have employed strategies such as filing additional patents, pursuing patent term extensions, and engaging in patent litigations or settlements designed to delay generic market entry in select jurisdictions.

What are the factors influencing investment decisions?

Key factors include patent lifespan, potential for line extensions, market share retention strategies, and competitive landscape.

  • Patent Expiry: The loss of protection in the U.S. in 2020 resulted in revenue declines, but availability of secondary patents extends exclusivity in some markets until 2025–2027.
  • Line Extensions: Development of newer formulations or combination therapies, such as fixed-dose combinations with tenofovir or emtricitabine, can sustain revenue streams post-patent expiry.
  • Market Penetration: Global disparities exist; high-income countries have higher penetration, whereas emerging markets see increased generic use.
  • Pricing Strategies: Branded prices generally range from $2,000 to $3,500 per month; generics often reduce costs by 70–80%, impacting revenues.

What are the R&D and pipeline prospects?

The pipeline for atazanavir is limited. No major phase III studies are ongoing for new indications. Nonetheless, efforts focus on combination therapy optimization, formulations (such as long-acting injectables), and exploring resistance profiles.

Emerging drugs targeting HIV are diversifying the treatment landscape: integrase inhibitors, entry inhibitors, and novel long-acting injectables threaten market share for existing protease inhibitors like atazanavir sulfate.

How does the competitive landscape influence investment?

Investors should weigh patent expiration timelines against potential line extensions, the speed of generic entry, and the pipeline development. The transition toward long-acting modalities like Cabotegravir-LA by ViiV or Johnson & Johnson may erode traditional protease inhibitor markets.

Market share in emerging markets remains accessible, but price discounts and regulatory hurdles lower profit margins. Companies with diversified HIV portfolios or those investing in next-generation agents may offer more stable prospects.

What are the key financial metrics to monitor?

  • Revenue Trends: Declines post-patent expiration, potentially stabilized by new formulations or combinations.
  • Market Share: Erosion in mature markets aligning with patent cliffs.
  • Margins: Compression due to generic competition and price pressures.
  • Pipeline Milestones: Indicators of future growth potential through combination therapies or novel formulations.

What is the strategic outlook?

Investors should monitor patent litigation outcomes, regulatory approvals for line extensions, and developments in long-acting deliverables. Patents expiring in 2025–2027 mean revenue declines are imminent unless compensated by new product launches or market expansion.

In markets with limited generic presence, maintaining patent protections, pricing power, and strategic alliances remain pivotal. The shift toward less frequent dosing and combination therapies offers opportunities to extend lifecycle revenues.

Key Takeaways

  • Atazanavir sulfate's patent protection is largely lost in the US since 2020 but persists in other markets until 2025–2027 via secondary patents.
  • Global sales peaked in 2019 but declined as generic competition increased post-2020.
  • Investment risks heighten as patent expiration approaches, but line extensions and combination therapies can mitigate declines.
  • The market is shifting toward long-acting injectables and newer medication classes, pressuring traditional protease inhibitors.
  • Companies with diversified HIV portfolios, active R&D pipelines, or strategic patent filings may maintain competitive advantages.

FAQs

1. How significant is the impact of patent expiration on atazanavir sales?
Patent expiration in key markets has resulted in sharp revenue declines, with generic pricing eroding branded sales by up to 80%. The most substantial impact is observed in the US after 2020, with other markets experiencing similar trends as generics enter.

2. Are there promising line extensions for atazanavir?
Limited recent developments focus on fixed-dose combinations with other antiretrovirals and long-acting formulations. These have the potential to sustain revenues post-patent expiry but are still under evaluation or in early clinical stages.

3. How do generic entrants affect pricing strategies?
Generic competition reduces prices significantly, often by 70–80%, decreasing profit margins for branded manufacturers. This underscores the importance of patent protection and differentiation strategies.

4. What are the primary risks for investing in atazanavir-related assets?
Patent expiration, generic market entry, competition from novel therapies, and regulatory delays pose risks. Additionally, shifts toward long-acting treatments could diminish demand for oral protease inhibitors.

5. What should investors watch for in upcoming years?
Patent expiry timelines, pipeline progress, market share shifts, and introduction of long-acting formulations or combination therapies. Strategic patent filings or legal challenges can also influence timelines and revenues.


References

[1] IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Data and Trends, 2020-2022."
[2] U.S. FDA. "Reyataz (Atazanavir) Drug Label."
[3] European Medicines Agency. "Reyataz Summary of Product Characteristics."
[4] EvaluatePharma. "Global HIV Drug Sales & Patent Expiry Analysis," 2021.
[5] Watson, J., et al. "Impact of Patent Expirations on HIV Drugs," Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.