You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

ammonia n-13 - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for ammonia n-13 and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Ammonia n-13 is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by 3d Imaging Drug, Biomedcl Res Fdn, Brigham Womens Hosp, Cardinal Hlth 414, Central Radiopharm, Essential Isotopes, Feinstein, Gen Hosp, Ionetix, Johns Hopkins Univ, Kreitchman Pet Ctr, Mcprf, Methodist, Midwest Medcl, Mips Crf, Ncm Usa Bronx Llc, Nukemed, Petnet, Precision Nuclear, Shertech Labs Llc, Sofie, Ucla Biomedical, Ucsf Rodiopharm, Univ Alahama Birm, Univ Tx Md Anderson, Univ Tx Sw Medctr, Univ Wisconsin, Wa Univ Sch Med, and Wisconsin, and is included in thirty-one NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for ammonia n-13
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:29
NDAs:31

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ammonia n-13

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
3d Imaging Drug AMMONIA N 13 ammonia n-13 INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 203779-001 Oct 19, 2015 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Biomedcl Res Fdn AMMONIA N 13 ammonia n-13 INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 204352-001 May 1, 2015 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Brigham Womens Hosp AMMONIA N 13 ammonia n-13 INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 203783-001 Oct 30, 2014 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cardinal Hlth 414 AMMONIA N 13 ammonia n-13 INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 203700-001 Feb 25, 2013 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for Ammonia N-13

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

Ammonia N-13 (Nitrogen-13 labeled ammonia) is a radiopharmaceutical primarily used in myocardial perfusion imaging within nuclear medicine. Its short half-life (~10 minutes) necessitates on-site cyclotron production, constraining its market but offering high-value clinical applications. This document analyzes current investment scenarios, market dynamics, and financial trajectories, emphasizing technical specifications, regulatory landscapes, competitive positioning, and future growth drivers.


What is Ammonia N-13 and Why Is It Important?

Feature Details
Chemical Composition Radioisotope: Nitrogen-13 labeled ammonia (NH3)
Half-life Approximately 9.97 minutes (limiting distribution radius)
Production Method Cyclotron-based proton irradiation of oxygen-15 labeled water (H2^15O) or through dedicated nitrogen-13 generators
Primary Clinical Use Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for diagnosing ischemic heart disease
Advantages Rapid image acquisition, high spatial resolution, effective blood flow quantification

Current Investment Scenario

Market Size and Valuation

Metric Data Source
Global Radiopharmaceutical Market (2022) ~$7.2 billion [1]
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Market ~$1.4 billion [2]
Estimated Share of Ammonia N-13 10-15% Industry estimates (due to its niche but high-value application)

Key Players and Production Infrastructure

Companies Production Capabilities Geographic Focus Regulatory Approvals
Siemens Healthineers On-site cyclotron units in major hospitals Global FDA, EMA approvals for CardioGen-82 (Rubidium-82), comparable
Bracco Imaging Cyclotron services and radiopharmaceuticals Europe, US FDA approvals; active in cardiac PET agents
Cardinal Health Radiopharmaceutical distribution centers US Licensed for production and distribution

Investment Drivers

  • High clinical value of ammonia N-13 in cardiac PET scans, which offer superior image quality over SPECT.
  • Growing demand for non-invasive cardiac diagnostics, especially in developed markets.
  • Technological advancements in cyclotron technology reducing production costs.
  • Policy shifts favoring PET over SPECT for myocardial perfusion, supported by updated clinical guidelines (e.g., American College of Cardiology).

Market Dynamics

Supply Constraints

Factor Impact Details
Short half-life Limits distribution radius Typically produced on-site or nearby, restricting large-scale distribution
Infrastructure costs High initial investment Cyclotron installation costs (~$5-10 million), operational expenses
Regulatory hurdles Time-consuming approval processes Must adhere to stringent safety, manufacturing, and radioprotection standards

Demand Drivers

Trend Effect Supporting Data
Rising incidence of cardiovascular diseases Increases demand for MPI Globally, CVD responsible for 17.9 million deaths annually [3]
Preference for PET over SPECT Enhances adoption of ammonia N-13 PET provides better resolution and quantification
Reimbursement policies Favor high-value PET diagnostics Medicare and private insurers increasingly reimburse cardiac PET

Competitive Landscape

Agent Half-life Production Method Advantages Limitations
Ammonia N-13 10 min Cyclotron High spatial resolution Infrastructure intensive
Rubidium-82 76 sec Generator-based No cyclotron needed Lower image resolution; high cost per dose
Technetium-99m 6 hours Generator Well-established Less suited for cardiac PET

Regulatory Environment

Region Regulatory Bodies Requirements Clinical Guidelines References
US FDA IND filings, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) ACC/AHA guidelines recommend PET for MPI [4]
EU EMA Marketing authorization, safety standards Similar standards aligning with US (CE marking)

Financial Trajectory Analysis

Revenue Projections

Assumption Value Source/Notes
Annual number of PET MPI procedures 3 million globally [5], projecting 5% CAGR
Percentage utilizing ammonia N-13 60% Market preference, infrastructure availability
Average revenue per dose $500 Including production, distribution, and reimbursement rates

Projected Revenue (2022-2027):

Year Units Sold Revenue (USD millions) Growth Rate
2022 1.8 million $900 Base year
2023 1.89 million $945 5% CAGR
2024 1.98 million $990 5% CAGR
2025 2.08 million $1,040 5% CAGR
2026 2.18 million $1,090 5% CAGR
2027 2.29 million $1,145 5% CAGR

Cost Structures and Profit Margins

Cost Element Approximate Percentage Notes
Cyclotron setup and maintenance 40% of production costs Capital expenditure amortized over asset life
Radiopharmaceutical production 25% Raw materials, staffing, safety
Distribution and logistics 15% Short-distance due to half-life constraints
Regulatory compliance & overhead 10% Licensing, quality assurance
Profit margin 20-25% Potential, subject to volume and operational efficiency

Key Financial Risks

  • Production Disruptions: Cyclotron breakdowns affecting supply.
  • Regulatory Delays: Approval setbacks impacting market entry.
  • Technological Competition: Emergence of alternative agents (e.g., Rubidium-82).
  • Market Penetration: Slow adoption due to high infrastructure costs.

Emerging Market Opportunities

Segment Potential Constraints
Developing Markets Growing healthcare infrastructure Limited cyclotron deployment
New Clinical Indications Neuroimaging, theranostics Regulatory approvals needed
Collaborative Production Shared cyclotron networks Logistical complexity

Comparative Analysis with Alternative Imaging Agents

Agent Half-life Production Complexity Image Quality Cost per Dose Deployment Feasibility
Ammonia N-13 10 min High Excellent ~$500 On-site cyclotron mandatory
Rubidium-82 76 sec Low (generator-based) Good ~$650 Widely deployable
Technetium-99m 6 hours Moderate Moderate ~$20 Extensive existing infrastructure

Implication: Ammonia N-13 remains a preferred agent where high-quality PET imaging is prioritized, despite infrastructure costs.


Future Growth Drivers and Challenges

Drivers Impact Data/Trends
Advances in Cyclotron Technologies Lowering barriers to entry Compact cyclotrons (e.g., Siemens’ "Next-Generation" units)
Increasing Adoption of Cardiac PET Market expansion Expected CAGR of 8% in cardiac PET procedures [6]
Regulatory Support Accelerated approvals Recent FDA initiatives for radiopharmaceuticals
Clinical Evidence Improved diagnostic confidence Studies demonstrating PET's superiority over SPECT [7]
Challenges Impact
High Capital Investment Deters entry for smaller institutions
Short Half-life Constraints Limits distribution footprint
Competitive Agents E.g., Rubidium-82 generator-based system
Regulatory Complexity Lengthy approval timelines

Key Takeaways

  • Niche Yet High-Value: Ammonia N-13 plays a crucial role in cardiac PET imaging, which is gaining preference over SPECT for its superior diagnostic quality.
  • Infrastructure Intensity: The requirement for on-site cyclotrons limits broad market penetration but creates high-value opportunities for established centers.
  • Market Growth: Projected CAGR of approximately 5% for related procedures, driven by increasing global cardiovascular disease burden and evolving clinical guidelines favoring PET.
  • Financial Potential: Industry estimates suggest revenues in the ~$1 billion range by 2027, with profit margins favoring well-established providers.
  • Competition and Innovation: Development of compact cyclotrons and alternative agents, including Rubidium-82, challenge ammonia N-13’s dominance but also stimulate technological advancement.

FAQs

1. What are the main barriers to investing in ammonia N-13 production?
High capital costs for cyclotron installation, regulatory compliance, and the short half-life limiting distribution are primary barriers. These demand substantial upfront investment and operational expertise.

2. How does ammonia N-13 compare with Rubidium-82 in myocardial imaging?
Ammonia N-13 offers higher spatial resolution and more accurate quantification due to its PET properties but requires a cyclotron. Rubidium-82 has a shorter half-life, enabling generator-based, decentralized production with easier deployment but slightly lower image quality.

3. What is the future outlook for ammonia N-13’s market growth?
With increasing adoption of PET myocardial imaging, advancements in cyclotron technology, and expanding clinical validation, the market for ammonia N-13 is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6% over the next five years.

4. Are there upcoming regulatory changes that could impact the ammonia N-13 market?
Regulatory agencies are prioritizing radiopharmaceutical approval pathways to support innovation, potentially easing approval processes. However, compliance with safety standards remains rigorous.

5. What strategic moves are recommended for investors?
Focus on early entry into centers with existing cyclotron infrastructure, partnerships with clinical research organizations, and exploration of emerging indications beyond cardiology, such as neuroimaging.


References

[1] MarketsandMarkets. "Radiopharmaceuticals Market by Type, Application, Region — Global Forecast to 2027." 2022.

[2] Grand View Research. "Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report." 2021.

[3] World Health Organization. “Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs).” 2021.

[4] American College of Cardiology. "Appropriate Use Criteria for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging." 2020.

[5] Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. "Global PET Market Trends." 2022.

[6] Research and Markets. "Global Cardiac PET Imaging Market Analysis." 2022.

[7] Journal of Nuclear Medicine. "Comparison of PET and SPECT in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging." 2021.


This comprehensive analysis provides stakeholders with actionable insights into the investment potential, market dynamics, and financial trajectories concerning ammonia N-13, supporting strategic decision-making in the nuclear medicine sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.