Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Innogenix Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for INNOGENIX

INNOGENIX has six approved drugs.



Summary for Innogenix
US Patents:0
Tradenames:6
Ingredients:6
NDAs:6

Drugs and US Patents for Innogenix

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Innogenix EPLERENONE eplerenone TABLET;ORAL 203896-002 Feb 2, 2017 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Innogenix METRONIDAZOLE metronidazole TABLET;ORAL 070772-003 Oct 29, 2024 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Innogenix PILOCARPINE HYDROCHLORIDE pilocarpine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 076963-001 Dec 22, 2004 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Innogenix HALOPERIDOL haloperidol TABLET;ORAL 071173-006 Jan 7, 1988 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Innogenix PROPRANOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE propranolol hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 070322-001 Aug 4, 1986 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Innogenix Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent/IP Strength, and Strategic Options

Last updated: July 4, 2026

Innogenix’ competitive landscape hinges on how its portfolio maps to (1) Orange Book-licensed products and (2) enforceable, unexpired patent families covering active ingredients, formulations, and methods of use. Without the specific drug list (or FDA/Orange Book product identifiers) for “Innogenix,” a complete, litigation-grade patent and regulatory analysis cannot be produced.

What is Innogenix market position by product and geography?

A defensible “market position” view requires at minimum: the specific Innogenix commercial/clinical assets (drug names), the FDA application numbers or label indications, and the geography of sales or planned launches. “Innogenix” can refer to multiple entities and does not uniquely identify an FDA product portfolio.

What products does Innogenix compete with?

Competitive mapping must be drug-specific to identify:

  • Closest-in-class comparators (same MoA, same indication, same dosing regimen)
  • Same-drug substitution risk (therapeutic interchangeability)
  • Competitive advantage drivers (on-label efficacy/safety, delivery system, and payer positioning)

Where does Innogenix compete most?

Geography is required to assess:

  • Generic entry risk from first-filing applicants
  • Patent enforcement intensity (US vs EU vs UK)
  • Local regulatory requirements that affect development timelines

Which patents protect Innogenix drugs?

A patent-protection assessment requires the exact Innogenix products and their listed Orange Book patents (US) or corresponding patent family identifiers (EP/WO/CN).

How many patents cover Innogenix active ingredients, formulations, and methods of use?

A complete count is built from:

  • Orange Book “patent expiration” and “patent type” (drug substance, drug product, method of use, formulation, dosing)
  • Family breadth across jurisdictions
  • Continuation strategy and potential “evergreening” (terminal disclaimers, PTA/extension effects)

What is Innogenix patent estate strength?

Strength depends on:

  • Claim scope and remaining life (earliest priority, grant status, expiration mechanics)
  • Foreground enforceability (terminal disclaimers, obviousness risk, enablement risks)
  • Litigation history and claim construction trends

What is the Orange Book status of Innogenix products?

Orange Book status determines launch timing and generic leverage:

  • Listed drug(s) and reference listed drug (RLD) alignment
  • Patent listing types and expiration dates
  • Whether patents are “delisted” or “withdrawn” (affecting Paragraph IV viability)

How does Orange Book listing affect generic entry?

For a real risk model, each Innogenix product must be linked to:

  • Orange Book expiration schedule
  • First Paragraph IV filer(s) and settled/non-settled status
  • 30-month stay triggers and subsequent effective dates

When does Innogenix lose exclusivity?

Exclusivity is not a single date. It is a layering model:

  • Regulatory exclusivities (NCE/505(b)(2) exclusivities, pediatric exclusivity)
  • Patent expiration dates (including patent term adjustment and extensions)
  • Indication-specific exclusivities if applicable

What is Innogenix exclusivity timeline by indication?

Timeline requires indication-level mapping to:

  • Submission dates and approval dates
  • Pediatric plan/deferrals and granted pediatric exclusivity
  • Method-of-use vs formulation patent gaps

Which companies are challenging Innogenix with Paragraph IV certifications?

A Paragraph IV landscape requires identifying:

  • ANDA/BLA challenges tied to Innogenix’s listed patents
  • Notice letters and filing dates
  • Whether litigation resulted in a settlement or adverse judgments

What patent litigation affects Innogenix competitive risk?

Litigation-grade analysis must compile:

  • Case numbers and courts
  • Asserted patent lists per case
  • Claim construction outcomes that shift infringement posture
  • Settlement terms that govern effective launch dates

What generic entry risks exist for Innogenix products?

Entry risk is driven by:

  • Patent calendar proximity
  • Strength of asserted claims (scoreable via claim coverage and prior invalidation patterns)
  • Whether competitors have “launch-ready” formulations with patent-crossing workarounds

What formulations are protected by Innogenix patents?

Formulation protection changes entry:

  • Switching from one salt/polymorph to another
  • Changing excipient systems or particle-size distributions
  • Altering dosage form (IR vs ER, tablet vs capsule)
  • Using alternative routes or delivery devices

How does Innogenix compare with leading competitors?

A comparison must be drug-specific to be actionable:

  • MoA equivalence and differentiation
  • Safety profile comparators by trial endpoints or real-world signals
  • Net price and discounting structure (if available)
  • Formulary placement and PBM tier status (if available)

What is the competitive advantage for Innogenix?

For a defensible advantage assessment, the analysis must connect competitive outcomes to:

  • Patent-protected differentiation (not branding alone)
  • Regulatory exclusivity leverage
  • Supply chain and manufacturing constraints affecting timelines

What manufacturing or IP barriers block generic or biosimilar entry?

Barrier types depend on product modality:

  • Small molecule: process patents, polymorph/salt control, manufacturing impurities
  • Biologics/biosimilars: cell line, purification process, formulation, analytical comparability
  • Devices: combination product classification and device IP

Are there process or manufacturing patents in Innogenix families?

Process patents can block “design-around” even when drug substance patents expire. The analysis requires:

  • Process patent numbers
  • Claimed unit operations
  • Time-to-design-around feasibility for ANDA developers

What patent expiration dates matter most for Innogenix competition?

An expiration watchlist requires:

  • For each Innogenix product: earliest and latest expiration dates across all listed patents
  • Which patents are “blocking” (still in force and asserted in litigation)
  • Which patents are “paper” (likely unenforceable or narrow)

Expiration calendar template (to be populated per Innogenix product)

Innogenix product (active) Patent family (key US patent nos.) Patent type Expiration date (earliest) Expiration date (latest) Blocking?
[TBD] [TBD] Drug substance / drug product / method of use [TBD] [TBD] [TBD]

Innogenix licensing and settlement strategy: what matters commercially?

Settlement and licensing determine:

  • “Carve-out” design arounds
  • Royalty-bearing agreements
  • Bottlenecks created by shared exclusivity or supply arrangements

What settlement agreements control launch?

A settlement analysis requires:

  • Agreement dates
  • Effective launch dates and scope (specific dosage forms/strengths)
  • Patent coverage carve-outs and dismissal language

What is the FDA development and approval status for Innogenix?

A regulatory status model requires:

  • Application type (NDA/BLA/505(b)(2))
  • Approval dates
  • Exclusivity grants and labeling status
  • Postmarketing commitments impacting launch readiness

Which FDA pathway was used and how does it affect exclusivity?

Pathway impacts:

  • Exclusivity entitlements
  • Reference product dependencies
  • Patent listing breadth (especially for 505(b)(2))

Key Takeaways

  • A litigation-grade Innogenix competitive landscape requires the specific Innogenix products tied to FDA/Orange Book identifiers.
  • Patent strength, Paragraph IV risk, and exclusivity timelines must be built from product-linked Orange Book listings, not entity-level assumptions.
  • The strategic priorities for Innogenix (licensing vs defense, formulation differentiation, and launch blocking) are determined by which patents are unexpired and enforceable at the drug and indication level.

FAQs

  1. How do Orange Book patent types (drug substance vs drug product vs method of use) change ANDA design-around risk?
  2. What data points determine whether a Paragraph IV filing triggers a 30-month stay?
  3. How do pediatric exclusivity and patent term adjustment alter the exclusivity expiration calendar?
  4. What does “delisting” typically signal about the remaining enforceability of an Innogenix patent estate?
  5. How should a competitor evaluate formulation or process changes that attempt to avoid infringement after Orange Book expiration?

References

(No sources cited because the required product-specific FDA/Orange Book and patent records for “Innogenix” were not provided in the prompt.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.