Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Halsey Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for HALSEY

HALSEY has ninety approved drugs.



Summary for Halsey
US Patents:0
Tradenames:57
Ingredients:52
NDAs:90

Drugs and US Patents for Halsey

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Halsey GLUTETHIMIDE glutethimide TABLET;ORAL 089459-001 Oct 10, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Halsey CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE HYDROCHLORIDE chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 085339-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Halsey METOCLOPRAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE metoclopramide hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 070906-001 Oct 28, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Pharmaceutical Competitive Landscape Analysis for Halsey: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Generic or Biosimilar Entry Risks

Last updated: July 30, 2026

Executive summary: The provided input names only “Halsey” and does not identify the drug, active ingredient, dosage form, product strength, FDA application/label, or geography. Without a specific reference product, no complete, accurate market- and patent-competition landscape can be constructed (Orange Book status, exclusivity timelines, Paragraph IV risk, litigation posture, and entrant probabilities all require the exact FDA/Drug product identity).

H2: What is “Halsey” in the pharmaceutical competitive landscape (drug, generic, or company)?
No complete competitive landscape can be produced because “Halsey” is ambiguous. Market position analysis depends on the exact product identity (INN/USAN, brand name, label strength, route, NDA/BLA), which also governs patentability and regulatory exclusivity.

H2: What patents protect Halsey and how many are Orange Book-listed?
Patent protection and Orange Book listings cannot be enumerated without the precise reference listed drug (RLD) and FDA application number. Patent count, expiration dates, and claim scope vary by formulation, route of administration, and label.

H2: When does Halsey lose exclusivity and what are the key expiration dates?
Exclusivity timelines (NCE, new clinical investigation, pediatric exclusivity, 505(b)(2) exclusivity, and patent terms) require the NDA/BLA and the specific RLD. Without that, exclusivity end dates and generic launch windows cannot be determined.

H2: Which companies are challenging Halsey with Paragraph IV ANDA filings?
Paragraph IV challenge identification requires the specific ANDA filers, filing dates, and the Orange Book “reference listed drug” linkage. That information cannot be mapped to “Halsey” without product definition.

H2: What patent litigation affects Halsey (settlements, injunctions, and case outcomes)?
Litigation and settlements are docket- and label-specific. Without the product identity, no accurate case list or outcome timeline can be produced.

H2: What generic entry risks exist for Halsey under Hatch-Waxman?
Generic entry risk depends on which patents are listed, which are “not infringed” or “invalid” in Paragraph IV certifications, and whether any court decisions affect remaining exclusivity. Product identity is required.

H2: How does Halsey compare with competing drugs in its therapeutic class?
Competitive positioning needs the therapeutic indication(s), clinical endpoints, dosing, safety profile, payer positioning, and sales benchmark. None of this can be anchored to a specific “Halsey” product without the drug name and indication.

H2: What formulations are protected for Halsey (IR/ER, dosing device, and manufacturing patents)?
Formulation and manufacturing patents are product- and process-specific. Without exact dosage form and strength, it is not possible to map protected subject matter or design-around constraints.

H2: What is the FDA regulatory status of Halsey (NDA, 505(b)(2), BLA, and approval timeline)?
FDA status requires the application type, RLD designation, approval dates, and labeling. That cannot be derived from “Halsey” alone.

H2: What licensing deals involve Halsey and how do they shape the competitive landscape?
Licensing structures are tied to the specific IP assets and jurisdictions. Without identifying the asset owner and product, a deal-level landscape cannot be produced.


Key Takeaways

  • A competitive and patent landscape requires the exact reference product that “Halsey” refers to (active ingredient/USAN, brand name, route, strength, and FDA application).
  • Patents, Orange Book listings, exclusivity end dates, Paragraph IV risk, and litigation posture cannot be accurately enumerated without that product identity.
  • No defensible market-position assessment can be completed without the therapeutic indication(s) and RLD.

FAQs

  1. How do you determine the correct Orange Book reference listed drug (RLD) for a product named “Halsey”?
  2. What factors determine whether a Paragraph IV ANDA is likely to be successful against an RLD?
  3. How do formulation changes (IR vs ER) typically affect patent and regulatory exclusivity risk?
  4. What court rulings most influence remaining patent barriers to generic launch under Hatch-Waxman?
  5. How is biosimilar risk assessed when patents are tied to method-of-use versus manufacturing or formulation?

References (APA)

No sources were cited because no specific Halsey product, FDA listing, or patent dataset could be identified from the provided input.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.