Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Areva Pharms Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for AREVA PHARMS

AREVA PHARMS has five approved drugs.



Summary for Areva Pharms
US Patents:0
Tradenames:5
Ingredients:5
NDAs:5

Drugs and US Patents for Areva Pharms

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Areva Pharms FUROSEMIDE furosemide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 208435-001 Dec 18, 2020 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Areva Pharms CASPOFUNGIN ACETATE caspofungin acetate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 211263-002 Oct 1, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Areva Pharms PAMIDRONATE DISODIUM pamidronate disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 077433-003 Nov 26, 2008 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Areva Pharms CASPOFUNGIN ACETATE caspofungin acetate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 211263-001 Oct 1, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Areva Pharms TERBUTALINE SULFATE terbutaline sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 200122-001 Nov 8, 2013 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Last updated: July 9, 2026

Areva Pharms Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Generic/Biosimilar Risk

Executive summary: Areva Pharms’ competitive footprint is not determinable from the provided prompt because there is no drug/portfolio identifier, jurisdictions, product list, or FDA/Orange Book linkage. A defensible patent-and-regulatory competitive landscape requires at minimum the specific marketed products (active ingredients, dosage forms, strengths) and the relevant regulatory filings (e.g., NDA/BLA/ANDA numbers or Orange Book drug entries).

Result: No complete and accurate analysis can be produced.

Which products does Areva Pharms market and what are their FDA statuses?

No product-specific inputs are provided for Areva Pharms, so FDA status, exclusivity, and regulatory pathway cannot be matched to a patent estate or competitive generic/biosimilar scenario.

NDA, ANDA, and BLA mapping for Areva Pharms

Not determinable without product identifiers (active ingredient, dosage form, strength) and corresponding FDA application numbers.

Orange Book entries for Areva Pharms

Not determinable without the Orange Book drug list tied to Areva Pharms’ marketed products.

What patents protect Areva Pharms’ products in the Orange Book?

A complete patent protection analysis requires listing the relevant patents tied to each Orange Book-listed product (US patents, publication numbers, patent types such as composition, formulation, method-of-use, and device/packaging where applicable).

How many patents cover each Areva Pharms product?

Not determinable without the set of Orange Book listings for the company.

When do Areva Pharms patents expire by active ingredient and dosage form?

Not determinable without the expiration dates and patent numbers from the Orange Book record(s).

When does Areva Pharms lose exclusivity and when can generics launch?

Exclusivity timing depends on:

  • patent expiration dates (statutory and regulatory patent terms),
  • 5-year/3-year exclusivity eligibility,
  • pediatric exclusivity,
  • regulatory exclusivity triggers for NDAs or 505(b)(2),
  • ANDA submission dates, if any, and Paragraph IV eligibility.

None of these can be linked without product and regulatory identifiers.

Paragraph IV challenges against Areva Pharms: which cases matter?

Not determinable without litigation dockets, FDA acceptance/approval history, or Orange Book ANDA certifications.

Settlement agreements and design-around threats

Not determinable without any publicly reported settlements tied to Areva Pharms’ products.

What formulations are protected and can generics copy them?

Formulation and manufacturing protections require identifying:

  • composition/formulation patents (including polymorph/crystal form where applicable),
  • process patents (granulation, crystallization, lyophilization, sterilization, etc.),
  • stability/method claims,
  • combination-drug fixed-dose patents.

No product formulation details were provided.

Solid oral dosage, injectables, and topical products: what is protected?

Not determinable without specifying dosage form and active ingredients.

How does Areva Pharms compare with competing brands on patent strength?

A comparative landscape requires:

  • competitor brand list by active ingredient,
  • shared patent families and cross-licensing,
  • relative remaining term to generic entry,
  • breadth of claims and claim survivability based on litigation outcomes.

No comparator brands or active ingredients were provided.

What patent litigation affects Areva Pharms’ market access?

Patent litigation analysis requires:

  • case captions,
  • districts,
  • filing and dismissal timelines,
  • asserted patents,
  • outcomes (dismissal, infringement verdict, settlement, covenant not to sue).

No litigation identifiers are provided.

What is the biosimilar risk for Areva Pharms products?

Biosimilar risk requires knowing whether Areva Pharms has biologics:

  • BLA references,
  • biosimilar/ interchangeability designations,
  • relevant biosimilar patent dispute filings (BPCIA timelines and patent lists).

No biologics were provided.

What generic entry risks exist for Areva Pharms at the ANDA level?

Generic entry risks require:

  • Orange Book certification (Paragraph I/II/III/IV) status,
  • number of ANDAs filed,
  • tentative approval dates and approval outcomes,
  • exclusivity barriers.

No ANDA/Orange Book data is provided.

Which companies are challenging Areva Pharms and where?

This requires knowing challenged products and jurisdictions.

What licensing deals and supply relationships shape Areva Pharms’ strategy?

Licensing and supply landscape depends on disclosed agreements (press releases, SEC filings, court records) tied to specific products or IP families.

Geographic coverage: where is Areva Pharms exposed to generic competition?

Geographic exposure depends on:

  • marketing authorization status by country,
  • local regulatory reviews,
  • local patent filing and enforcement.

No countries or products are provided.

Areva Pharms manufacturing and IP barriers: what blocks copycats?

Manufacturing/IP barriers require:

  • process patents and manufacturing method claims,
  • regulatory data exclusivity strategy,
  • containment for sterile products and validation IP,
  • API sourcing and trade secret protections.

No product/process context is provided.


Key Takeaways

  • A defensible competitive landscape analysis for Areva Pharms cannot be generated from the prompt as provided because no Areva Pharms product portfolio, FDA regulatory linkages, or patent/Orange Book identifiers are specified.
  • Patent expiration, exclusivity, Paragraph IV risk, and biosimilar exposure are not computable without the specific active ingredients and corresponding FDA/Orange Book records.
  • Litigation and licensing impacts cannot be mapped without product-level court cases and agreement disclosures.

FAQs

  1. What information is required to build a patent exclusivity and generic entry risk model for a specific company’s products?
  2. How do Paragraph IV certifications alter the timing of generic approval relative to patent expiration?
  3. What types of patents (composition, formulation, method-of-use) most frequently block generic design-around strategies?
  4. How is biosimilar risk assessed for a brand’s biologic when multiple patent lists exist under BPCIA?
  5. What Orange Book fields most strongly predict generic launch probability and revenue exposure?

References

No sources cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.