Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Alra Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for ALRA

ALRA has twenty-four approved drugs.



Summary for Alra
US Patents:0
Tradenames:17
Ingredients:15
NDAs:24

Drugs and US Patents for Alra

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Alra DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE diphenhydramine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 080519-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alra ACETAZOLAMIDE acetazolamide TABLET;ORAL 083320-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alra GEN-XENE clorazepate dipotassium TABLET;ORAL 071787-001 Apr 26, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alra ERYZOLE erythromycin ethylsuccinate; sulfisoxazole acetyl GRANULE;ORAL 062758-001 Jun 15, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alra IBU-TAB ibuprofen TABLET;ORAL 071059-001 Aug 11, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Last updated: July 24, 2026

ALRA (Drug) Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Generic/Biosimilar Risk

ALRA’s competitive landscape can’t be analyzed from a patent-and-regulatory standpoint because the active ingredient, formulation strength, FDA approval status, and Orange Book/Biologics License Application (BLA) listings are not identifiable from the single term “ALRA.” Without those anchors, no complete, defensible view can be produced for exclusivity timelines, patent estates, Paragraph IV risk, litigation posture, or generic entry scenarios.

No other information is available in the prompt to map “ALRA” to a specific regulated drug product or patent family.

What is ALRA’s active ingredient and which FDA application does it map to?

If “ALRA” is not uniquely tied to an FDA-approved drug substance/product record (NDC, application number, Orange Book listing, or BLA), then the competitive landscape cannot be built with reliable coverage of:

  • Market authorization (ANDA vs BLA vs 505(b)(2))
  • Exclusivity drivers (NCE, 3-year, 5-year, patent term extension, pediatric exclusivity)
  • Listed patents (drug substance, drug product, methods of use)
  • Challenge pathways (Paragraph IV for ANDAs; biosimilar pathway for BLAs)

What patents protect ALRA’s drug product, methods of use, and manufacturing?

A patent estate assessment requires the exact Orange Book patent set (US patents listed for the relevant NDC strengths) or the relevant BLA-related patent listings. Without identifying the specific ALRA product record, the analysis cannot include:

  • Patent numbers and assignees
  • Filing/priority dates and expiration dates
  • Claim scope drivers (composition, formulation, process, method-of-use)
  • Statutory bases (35 USC 156/157 term extension; 35 USC 271e(a) exposure)

When does ALRA lose exclusivity and when are generic or biosimilar entry windows likely?

Exclusivity and timing are computed off product-specific facts:

  • First FDA approval date
  • Exclusivity type and end date (NCE, pediatric, orphan, 5-year, etc.)
  • Patent expiry dates and any patent term adjustment/extension
  • 180-day exclusivity triggers and forfeiture conditions after first Paragraph IV notice (for ANDAs)

Without a mapped product record, no valid exclusivity timeline can be produced.

What generic entry risks exist for ALRA under Paragraph IV challenges?

A Paragraph IV risk profile needs:

  • Whether ALRA is ANDA-listed
  • Whether there are already filed ANDAs with “Para IV” certifications
  • Whether there are district court litigations and stay/unsafety outcomes (30-month stay, injunctions, settlements)
  • Whether generics are blocked by unexpired composition or method-of-use claims

None of these can be supported without the exact FDA listing and patent identifiers.

How strong is the patent estate for ALRA compared with competing drugs in its class?

A strength comparison requires:

  • Competitor identification (drug class, mechanism, line of therapy, route, dosage form)
  • Side-by-side patent duration and claim coverage
  • Litigation history and settlement patterns
  • Formulation and method-of-use overlap that affects switching risk

No drug identity is available, so comparative benchmarking is not possible.

Which companies are challenging ALRA and what litigation affects launch timing?

A complete litigation scan requires:

  • Filed Paragraph IV notices and the generic sponsor names
  • Case numbers, filing dates, courts, and asserted patents
  • Settlement dates, agreement terms (exclusivity transfer, launch date designations, workarounds)

No ALRA-specific mapping exists, so no compliant litigation or settlement record can be stated.

What is the Orange Book status of ALRA by NDC strength and dosage form?

Orange Book status is product- and strength-specific. The analysis must report:

  • Listed patents per NDC (drug substance/drug product/method)
  • Expiration and PTE/PED status
  • Regulatory exclusivities tied to listing records

Without the ALRA product identity, there is no Orange Book record to cite.

What formulations are protected by ALRA patents and how does that change biosimilar or generic design space?

Formulation and device/delivery protections require:

  • Claim-level protection analysis of listed patents
  • Whether protections are tied to amorphous/crystalline form, polymorphs, particle size, coatings, excipients, or release profiles
  • Whether process claims block generic manufacturing or create design-around barriers

These elements cannot be extracted without the relevant patent numbers.

How does ALRA compare with brand and generic competitors on exclusivity, pricing pressure, and switching risk?

A competitive market-position view needs:

  • U.S. approval route and exclusivity end dates
  • Patent-expiry-driven launch timing
  • Revenue exposure based on competitors’ penetration and branded vs generic mix
  • Formulary status signals and payer dynamics

None can be computed without the product mapping.

What are ALRA’s commercial exposure risks from patent expiry, delistings, or enforcement actions?

Commercial exposure depends on:

  • Which patents are enforceable at the time of generic entry
  • Whether delistings occur after litigation or voluntary agreement
  • Whether enforcement triggers for injunction or damages are present
  • Whether manufacturing changes create new IP surfaces

No enforcement or delisting history can be stated for an unidentified product.

Key Takeaways

  • A complete competitive landscape analysis for “ALRA” cannot be produced from the information provided because the active ingredient and FDA product/patent mapping are not identifiable.
  • Without an identifiable FDA listing (Orange Book or BLA) the analysis cannot provide patent expirations, exclusivity windows, Paragraph IV/biosimilar risk, litigation posture, or commercial launch timing.

FAQs

  1. How do I map an abbreviation like “ALRA” to the correct FDA drug product for Orange Book analysis?
  2. What Orange Book data fields determine generic launch eligibility for ANDA filers?
  3. Which patent categories most often block generic substitution: composition, method-of-use, or formulation?
  4. How do 180-day exclusivity and 30-month stays affect the timing of generic entry after a Paragraph IV filing?
  5. What sources are used to reconcile Orange Book listings with court dockets for patent litigation timelines?

References

No sources are cited because no FDA/patent-identifying facts about “ALRA” are available in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.