You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for rifadin


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


rifadin

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Sanofi Aventis Us RIFADIN rifampin INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050627 NDA Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC 0068-0597-01 1 VIAL, GLASS in 1 CARTON (0068-0597-01) / 10 mL in 1 VIAL, GLASS 1989-05-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: RIFADIN

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Rifadin, the brand name for rifampin, is a critical antibiotic primarily used to treat tuberculosis (TB) and other bacterial infections. Its importance in global health initiatives, especially in TB control programs, underscores the need for a reliable and diverse supplier base. Ensuring continuous, high-quality supply of rifampin is vital for healthcare providers, governments, and pharmaceutical companies engaged in disease eradication efforts. This article examines key suppliers of Rifadin, analyzing their manufacturing capacity, regulatory status, and market influence to assist stakeholders in procurement, regulatory compliance, and strategic planning.


Overview of Rifadin (Rifampin)

Rifabutin, marketed as Rifadin in various regions, belongs to the rifamycin class of antibiotics. Its mechanism involves inhibiting bacterial RNA synthesis, demonstrating potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The drug's efficacy, safety profile, and WHO approval (Prequalification of Medicines Program) underscore its indispensable role in TB treatment regimens.

The global market for rifampin branded as Rifadin involves a complex supply chain comprising originators, generic producers, and contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs). The dynamic landscape is influenced by patent statuses, manufacturing regulations, and regional demand fluctuations.


Major Suppliers of Rifadin

1. Sanofi (Sanofi-Aventis)

Overview:
Sanofi has been a pivotal producer of rifampin-based pharmaceuticals, including Rifadin. The company’s manufacturing plant in France and associated facilities are GMP-compliant, ensuring high-quality standards.

Market Role:
Sanofi’s Rifadin has long-standing regulatory approval in multiple markets, including the U.S., Europe, and emerging economies. The company's capacity to meet regional demand, particularly in TB-endemic countries, positions it as the primary supplier in the international arena.

Supply Chain & Distribution:
Sanofi has a robust distribution network, facilitating supply to governments, NGOs, and private sectors. Their commitment to affordability and supply stability has made them a reliable source for TB programs globally.

2. Indian Manufacturers (Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Lupin Limited, and Other Generics)

Overview:
India hosts numerous WHO-prequalified generic manufacturers producing rifampin. These companies have leveraged patent expirations and local regulations to establish comprehensive production capacities.

Key Players:

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.:
    A leading generic pharmaceutical producer with WHO prequalification for rifampin. They manufacture both capsule and tablet forms supplied to multiple countries.

  • Lupin Limited:
    Recognized for its quality standards, Lupin’s rifampin products meet WHO and local regulatory guidelines, supporting TB control efforts in Asia and Africa.

  • Cadila Healthcare and Cipla:
    Both contribute significantly to the global rifampin supply, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Certifications & Quality:
All these manufacturers meet stringent WHO prequalification standards, enabling procurement for UN agencies and Gavi-supported immunization programs.

3. Chinese Manufacturers

Overview:
China is a significant supplier of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and finished rifampin formulations globally. Companies like Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical and Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine have become prominent in the supply chain.

Regulatory Status:
Many Chinese manufacturers possess both Chinese and international GMP certifications. However, some products may face regulatory hurdles in Western markets due to differing standards, though acceptance in many developing nations remains robust.

Market Impact:
Chinese firms benefit from large-scale manufacturing capacity and competitive pricing, vital for meeting demand in resource-limited settings.

4. European and North American Suppliers

Summary:
While fewer in number, certain European and North American pharmaceutical firms—such as Teva Pharmaceuticals and Mylan (now part of Viatris)—supply rifampin formulations, primarily catering to the North American and European markets.

Regulatory Advantage:
Their products generally carry stringent quality and regulatory approvals, providing confidence for high-end markets and stringent procurement standards.


Emerging Suppliers and Market Trends

  • Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs):
    The globalization of pharmaceutical manufacturing has led to increased reliance on CMOs for rifampin production, especially during supply shortages or surges in demand.

  • Patent Expirations & Generics:
    The expiration of Rifadin patents in multiple jurisdictions has facilitated the entrance of numerous generic suppliers, expanding the market and increasing supply diversification.

  • Quality and Regulatory Challenges:
    As supply chains expand, ensuring consistent quality and compliance with international standards remains critical. WHO prequalification plays a vital role in vendor qualification.

  • Supply Disruptions & Market Stability:
    Past shortages in rifampin have been linked to manufacturing issues, regulatory delays, and supply chain disruptions, emphasizing the need for manufacturers with robust compliance frameworks.


Regulatory and Quality Considerations

Procurement of rifampin requires adherence to international quality standards, particularly WHO prequalification, USP, and EMA approvals. Suppliers with these certifications have demonstrated consistent manufacturing practices aligned with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP).

Given the critical therapeutic role of Rifadin, suppliers must also be capable of scaling production rapidly to meet global TB treatment demand and participate in emergency mitigation strategies during supply disruptions.


Conclusion

The global supply of Rifadin (rifampin) involves a diverse array of manufacturers spanning developed and developing markets. Sanofi remains a benchmark supplier with long-standing regulatory approval and manufacturing capacity. Indian generics, Chinese API producers, and certain European companies significantly contribute to the supply chain, driven by cost-effectiveness, capacity, and regional demand.

International agencies and healthcare providers must evaluate supplier quality, regulatory standards, and supply stability when planning procurement strategies. The expansion of generic manufacturing, alongside strict adherence to international standards, enhances the resilience and affordability of rifampin supply, crucial for ongoing and future TB eradication efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • Sanofi remains a primary, high-quality supplier for Rifadin globally, especially for developed markets.
  • Indian and Chinese manufacturers have expanded production capacity, offering cost-effective alternatives, provided they meet international regulatory standards.
  • WHO prequalification is essential for suppliers to access global procurement channels, ensuring quality and safety.
  • Supply chain diversification mitigates risks of shortages; stakeholders should engage multiple reputable suppliers.
  • Regulatory compliance and quality assurance remain critical to maintaining a steady, safe supply of rifampin.

FAQs

1. Are generic rifampin products as effective as branded Rifadin?
Yes. When manufactured according to GMP standards and properly quality-tested, generic rifampin products are therapeutically equivalent to branded versions like Rifadin. WHO prequalification further assures equivalence and quality.

2. How do supply shortages of rifampin impact TB control programs?
Shortages can delay treatment, increase disease transmission, and foster drug resistance. Diversifying supplier sources and maintaining strategic reserves are vital measures to mitigate such risks.

3. What role does WHO prequalification play in rifampin procurement?
It provides assurance of product quality, safety, and efficacy, enabling procurement by UN agencies and governments, thus ensuring consistent supply and regulatory confidence.

4. Are there regulatory barriers for Chinese or Indian rifampin suppliers in Western markets?
While some Chinese manufacturers face regulatory hurdles due to differing standards, many Indian suppliers pursue WHO prequalification or comply with local approvals, expanding their global reach.

5. What strategies can stakeholders adopt to ensure continuous rifampin supply?
Stakeholders should engage with multiple certified suppliers, monitor supply chain logistics, maintain strategic stockpiles, and promote manufacturing investments to prevent shortages.


References

[1] World Health Organization. WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme. Rifampin specifications and prequalification status. https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/Prequalification_Rifampin

[2] Sanofi. Rifadin product information. https://www.sanofi.com

[3] WHO, The Global Algorithm for TB Treatment Management, 2022.

[4] Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance. List of WHO-prequalified rifampin manufacturers.

[5] Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Regulation standards for rifampin APIs and formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.