Last Updated: June 27, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Amneal Pharms PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 200963 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC 65162-694-86 118 mL in 1 BOTTLE (65162-694-86) 2013-11-01
Amneal Pharms PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 200963 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC 65162-694-90 473 mL in 1 BOTTLE (65162-694-90) 2013-11-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE

Last updated: June 11, 2026

Suppliers for Promethazine Hydrochloride + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride with Codeine Phosphate (API and Finished Dosage): Who Manufactures and Where Does Supply Concentrate?

Promethazine hydrochloride, phenylephrine hydrochloride, and codeine phosphate combination supply is typically sourced through two tiers: (1) API producers for each active ingredient and (2) finished-dosage manufacturers supplying prescription combination products. Public, authoritative supplier visibility is driven by FDA drug registration, Orange Book listings for specific NDC/strength combinations, and import/export records for labelers. Without the specific dosage form and strength, the supplier universe cannot be mapped to the exact product configuration in a way that is decision-grade.

Which companies supply promethazine hydrochloride API?

Most promethazine hydrochloride API supply is concentrated in Asian chemical and pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers that also register with FDA as drug establishments for one or more APIs. Finished product labelers commonly buy promethazine API through distributors or direct contracts rather than sourcing through multi-leg tenders.

What records show promethazine API suppliers in the US market?

  • FDA Drug Establishment Registration and Listing (DEA registrations) for API manufacturers and repackagers/importers
  • DMF holders (Drug Master File) that support NDA/ANDA supply chains for the finished product
  • Import/Customs supply chain artifacts tied to specific labelers and NDCs

What to check when selecting promethazine API sources

  • FDA establishment status for the API site(s)
  • Controlled substance handling requirements are not for promethazine itself, but for downstream combination products containing codeine
  • DMF linkage to the finished dosage manufacturer (if the finished product relies on a particular DMF)

Which companies supply phenylephrine hydrochloride API?

Phenylephrine hydrochloride API supply is similarly concentrated among chemical producers serving both US and global finished-goods supply.

What drives phenylephrine supply availability

  • Salt-form consistency (hydrochloride)
  • Particle size and crystallinity control targets tied to formulation performance
  • Manufacturing capacity cycles due to demand from multiple OTC and Rx products

What to check for phenylephrine API sourcing

  • DMF compatibility with the finished dosage formulation
  • Quality certifications for impurity profiles and stability (phenylephrine formulations are sensitive to degradation controls)

Which companies supply codeine phosphate API?

Codeine phosphate is the key gating component because it is tied to controlled substance regulatory controls (DEA in the US). Supplier selection depends on:

  • DEA registration status for the manufacturing and handling chain
  • DEA quotas for production and distribution
  • Controlled-substance compliant logistics for US import and distribution

What records show codeine phosphate API suppliers

  • DEA registration and quota documentation (at the company and facility level)
  • FDA establishment listings for codeine phosphate handling/production
  • DMFs supporting NDA/ANDA manufacturing

What to check for codeine API sourcing

  • DEA Schedule status compliance and quota availability
  • Batch release testing capability (identity, assay, impurity spectrum)
  • Site-level audit history for controlled-substance operations

Who supplies the finished combination product (promethazine + phenylephrine + codeine) in the US?

Finished product suppliers are the pharmaceutical labelers who market specific NDC/strength products. For this combination, the supply map is strongest at the NDC level, not at the “ingredient” level.

How Orange Book status affects supplier eligibility

For each NDC/strength:

  • The Orange Book lists active ingredient and patent-protected status for the finished product (where applicable).
  • If a product is protected by composition, method-of-use, or patent-tied exclusivity, sourcing may be limited to the authorized labeler and its contract manufacturers.

What to check for a specific supplier shortlist

  • NDC labeler identity and manufacturing site(s listed through FDA processes
  • Current market authorization (discontinued vs active)
  • Controlled-substance supply chain readiness (codeine component)

Do generic versions exist, and which generic makers compete for the same NDC strengths?

Competition depends on whether an ANDA has been approved for each specific combination and strength. Generic entry can be blocked by:

  • Composition or formulation patents covering the combination
  • Method-of-use patents tied to dosing or therapeutic indications
  • Controlled-substance manufacturing and labeling constraints

How to identify the competitive set

  • Orange Book: approved ANDAs and listed patents per NDC
  • FDA CDER approvals: ANDA approval history for the exact strength/form
  • Patent litigation dockets: Paragraph IV and subsequent settlement terms

What are the biggest supply risks for these actives together?

The combination’s supply risk is dominated by codeine phosphate controlled-substance constraints, layered over promethazine and phenylephrine API availability.

Supply-chain bottlenecks that routinely impact lead times

  • DEA quota limits for codeine phosphate
  • Contract manufacturing capacity at the finished dosage stage
  • Sterile vs non-sterile packaging line constraints (depending on whether the product is syrup, tablet, or another dosage form)

API vs finished-dosage outsourcing: which supplier model is common?

Most commercial strategies for this combination are:

  • API purchased from multiple qualified sources (to reduce downtime risk), then
  • finished dosage manufactured by a contract manufacturer under a quality system tied to regulatory filings for that NDC strength

How to structure a compliant supplier qualification

  • Establish GMP history and QC release testing for the specific dosage formulation
  • Perform controlled-substance supply chain compliance checks for codeine-containing lots
  • Validate impurity and dissolution specifications tied to the finished product

How does patent status influence supplier contracts and sourcing?

Even when multiple API suppliers exist, finished-dosage sourcing is constrained by:

  • Which labelers are authorized for the exact NDC/strength
  • Which manufacturers are permitted to produce the finished combination without patent infringement exposure
  • Any license or settlement terms tied to ANDA/generic entry

Why the supplier list often differs by NDC

Two labelers may both “sell the same ingredients,” but only one may have the regulatory authorization for the exact composition and strength, or may have the right to manufacture for that NDC under the applicable patent landscape.

Key takeaways

  • Ingredient-level suppliers for promethazine and phenylephrine are typically more plentiful than codeine phosphate due to controlled-substance constraints.
  • The practical supplier “shortlist” is best built by NDC/strength and labeler, then mapped back to contract manufacturers and API sources.
  • Patent and Orange Book status can restrict finished-dosage sourcing even when APIs are available.

FAQs

  1. How do I identify the contract manufacturing site for a promethazine/phenylephrine/codeine product by NDC?
  2. What controlled-substance compliance steps matter most when sourcing codeine phosphate for finished dosage manufacturing?
  3. How can Orange Book listings change the generic supplier landscape for this combination?
  4. What QC/impurity checks are most critical for phenylephrine hydrochloride in combination formulations?
  5. What are the common lead-time drivers for codeine phosphate API relative to promethazine and phenylephrine APIs?

References

  1. U.S. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. U.S. FDA. Drug Establishment Registration and Listing (DERL).
  3. U.S. DEA. Controlled Substances Registration and Quota Information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.