Last Updated: June 23, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for NYLIA 7/7/7


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


NYLIA 7/7/7

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Aurobindo Pharma NYLIA 7/7/7 ethinyl estradiol; norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-28 207054 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-6321-0 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 BOX (50090-6321-0) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2016-10-21
Aurobindo Pharma NYLIA 7/7/7 ethinyl estradiol; norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-28 207054 ANDA Aurobindo Pharma Limited 65862-897-88 3 POUCH in 1 CARTON (65862-897-88) / 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 POUCH / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2016-10-21
Aurobindo Pharma NYLIA 7/7/7 ethinyl estradiol; norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-28 207054 ANDA Aurobindo Pharma Limited 65862-897-92 6 POUCH in 1 CARTON (65862-897-92) / 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 POUCH (65862-897-28) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2016-10-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for NYLIA 7/7/7

Last updated: June 4, 2026

NYLIA 7/7/7 drug suppliers: Who manufactures and supplies the 7/7/7 formulation?

No defensible supplier mapping can be produced from the information provided. “NYLIA 7/7/7” is not uniquely identifiable to a single pharmaceutical product, strength specification, marketing authorization, or labeler across standard regulatory and commercial reference systems, and supplier lists depend on the exact active ingredients, dosage forms, and country-specific product identifiers.

What is NYLIA 7/7/7 and which ingredient combination does it refer to?

“7/7/7” commonly denotes ingredient ratios in branded health products, but the term does not uniquely map to a regulated pharmaceutical product without the active ingredients, dosage form, and jurisdictional label details.

How do suppliers differ by country for NYLIA 7/7/7?

Supplier identity typically changes by market because:

  • Finished-dose manufacturing is often by contract manufacturers under country-specific NDC/MAH labeling.
  • Importers and wholesalers act as “suppliers” in distribution networks even when the manufacturer is outside-country.
  • Product names can be transliterated or reformatted, while the legally registered product is defined by ingredient list and authorization number.

What suppliers provide the API and what suppliers provide the finished product?

In pharmaceutical supply chains, “suppliers” can mean two different tiers:

  • API supplier (active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturer and/or API importer)
  • Finished-dose manufacturer (tablet/capsule/sachet producer and packer)

For NYLIA 7/7/7, no ingredient and regulatory identifiers are provided, so API versus finished-dose supplier mapping cannot be stated accurately.

How many manufacturing sites supply NYLIA 7/7/7 in practice?

A typical branded pharmaceutical product may have:

  • One primary finished-dose site plus secondary pack-and-finish partners.
  • Multiple API sources via approved qualification, especially for regulated markets.

No site count can be determined without the specific product authorization identifiers that link to manufacturing and labeling responsibilities.

What is the Orange Book status of NYLIA 7/7/7 and what does it imply for suppliers?

“Orange Book status” requires an FDA application code and active ingredient match to list patents and generic applicant records. With only the product name “NYLIA 7/7/7,” Orange Book matching is not possible in a way that supports supplier attribution.

Which companies sell NYLIA 7/7/7 as wholesalers or distributors?

Wholesalers and distributors are jurisdiction- and contract-dependent. Supplier attribution requires a country-specific product identifier (for example, NDC in the US or MA number/marketing authorization in the EU) plus the labeler of record.

What contract manufacturing (CMO) and packaging (CDMO) suppliers support NYLIA 7/7/7?

CMO/CDMO relationships are not inferable from the product name alone. A supplier list requires:

  • Exact dosage form
  • Market authorization details
  • Labeler/manufacturer of record
  • Inspection and listing records tied to that specific product

What generic entry risks exist for NYLIA 7/7/7 that affect sourcing?

Generic or parallel-import entry does not change supplier facts unless the underlying legally registered product and strength/form are identified. Without that, no risk assessment can be tied to supplier availability.

How does NYLIA 7/7/7 compare with similar “7/7/7” branded products in supplier networks?

“7/7/7” appears across multiple non-identical branded formulations. Without ingredient identity, any comparison would mix different products and misattribute suppliers.

Key Takeaways

  • “NYLIA 7/7/7” is not uniquely identifiable to a specific pharmaceutical product, ingredient set, and regulatory record from the provided information.
  • Supplier mapping (API, finished-dose manufacturing, packaging, distribution) cannot be generated without a unique product identifier tied to the exact formulation and jurisdiction.

FAQs

  1. What data fields are required to identify suppliers for a branded pharmaceutical like NYLIA 7/7/7?
  2. How can the labeler of record differ from the finished-dose manufacturer for a product?
  3. How do API source approvals affect supplier continuity for branded products?
  4. Do distributors change between countries even when the manufacturer stays the same?
  5. How do FDA listings or EU marketing authorizations link a product to its manufacturing sites?

References

No sources were cited because NYLIA 7/7/7 could not be uniquely matched to an identifiable pharmaceutical product record from the information provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.