You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: TREPROSTINIL SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


TREPROSTINIL SODIUM

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium POWDER;INHALATION 213005 NDA Liquidia Technologies, Inc. 72964-011-01 7 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (72964-011-01) / 4 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK / 1 CAPSULE in 1 CAPSULE 2025-05-23
Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium POWDER;INHALATION 213005 NDA Liquidia Technologies, Inc. 72964-012-01 7 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (72964-012-01) / 4 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK / 1 CAPSULE in 1 CAPSULE 2025-05-23
Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium POWDER;INHALATION 213005 NDA Liquidia Technologies, Inc. 72964-013-01 7 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (72964-013-01) / 4 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK / 1 CAPSULE in 1 CAPSULE 2025-05-23
Liquidia Tech YUTREPIA treprostinil sodium POWDER;INHALATION 213005 NDA Liquidia Technologies, Inc. 72964-014-01 7 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (72964-014-01) / 4 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK / 1 CAPSULE in 1 CAPSULE 2025-05-23
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: TREPROSTINIL SODIUM

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Treprostinil sodium is a potent vasodilator predominantly employed in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It belongs to the prostacyclin analogs class, enhancing blood flow in pulmonary arteries and alleviating symptoms associated with PAH. As a high-value therapeutic agent, treprostinil sodium's market presence hinges upon a sophisticated supply chain comprising active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers, finished drug formulators, and distribution channels. This report thoroughly examines key suppliers, their manufacturing capacities, regulatory standing, and strategic implications for stakeholders.

Overview of Treprostinil Sodium: Market Significance

Initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2002, treprostinil sodium exhibits a broad application spectrum, including inhalation, subcutaneous, and intravenous administration routes. Its critical function in treating PAH underscores robust demand, especially among specialized pharmaceutical companies and compounding pharmacies.

The global market for treprostinil sodium is projected to grow steadily, driven by increased prevalence of PAH and expanded indications. Market analysts note the limited number of manufacturers due to the complexity of synthesis, stringent regulatory requirements, and patent landscape challenges. This bottleneck enhances the strategic value of existing suppliers.

Key API Suppliers for Treprostinil Sodium

1. United Therapeutics Corporation

Overview: United Therapeutics is the primary commercial manufacturer of treprostinil sodium, notably marketed as Remodulin®. The company maintains vertically integrated operations encompassing API synthesis, formulation, and distribution.

Manufacturing Capabilities: United Therapeutics owns dedicated production facilities compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Its API production involves complex chemical synthesis processes, with high purity standards and stringent quality controls. The company's R&D pipelines focus on alternative delivery forms and extended-release formulations.

Regulatory Status: The company's manufacturing sites are FDA-registered, with international regulatory approvals in regions such as the European Union and Japan, ensuring global distribution rights.

Market Impact: As the sole major API producer, United Therapeutics commands substantial market control, influencing pricing and supply stability.

2. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Overview: Teva is a leading generic pharmaceutical manufacturer with capabilities to produce treprostinil sodium as a generic alternative, pending patent expiry or through licensing agreements.

Manufacturing Capabilities: Teva operates multiple manufacturing facilities worldwide, employing advanced chemical synthesis and purification techniques for prostacyclin analogs. Their production lines adhere to stringent quality standards, ensuring bioequivalence and compliance.

Regulatory Compliance: Teva's manufacturing plants are registered with the FDA and international agencies, allowing for global distribution.

Market Position: The potential entry of Teva as a supplier can introduce competition, impacting market dynamics and pricing strategies.

3. Other Potential API Suppliers

  • Acorda Therapeutics: Engaged in pulmonary hypertension treatments; may possess R&D capacity for treprostinil sodium synthesis or derivatives.
  • Independent API Contract Manufacturers: Several smaller companies, primarily in India and China, have demonstrated capacity to produce prostacyclin analogs or similar compounds. These include companies such as Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, capable of scaling up production via licensing or partnership models.

Note: The complexity and regulatory demands limit rapid entry by new suppliers, emphasizing the importance of verified manufacturing credentials.

Emerging Suppliers and Market Dynamics

The field witnesses emerging suppliers, especially from Asia, seeking to capitalize on market demand through technological cost reductions and strategic licensing deals. Manufacturers such as Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical and other Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs) are investing in process optimization, potentially expanding supply options in the near future.

However, the transition from R&D to scaled GMP production entails significant challenges, including establishing GMP compliance, quality assurance, and regulatory approval, which act as barriers for new entrants.

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

Manufacturers must adhere to regulatory standards set by bodies such as the FDA, EMA, and PMDA. Certification processes involve rigorous validation of chemical synthesis pathways, impurity profiling, stability studies, and documentation. High purity (>99%) and batch-to-batch consistency are critical, considering treprostinil sodium's narrow therapeutic index.

Suppliers lacking robust quality management systems risk regulatory sanctions, supply interruptions, and reputational damage. As a result, global pharmaceutical companies prefer established manufacturers with proven compliance histories.

Strategic Implications

  • Dependence on United Therapeutics: Currently dominant, with potential vulnerabilities due to supply chain concentration.
  • Diversification of Suppliers: Developing alternative sources can reduce risk and foster competitive pricing.
  • Licensing and Technology Transfer: Opportunities exist for strategic partnerships with emerging manufacturers to expand capacity.
  • Supply Chain Integrity: Ensuring traceability and compliance is paramount, especially amidst global disruptions and evolving regulations.

Conclusion

The extraction of treprostinil sodium supply chains demonstrates a concentrated landscape primarily led by United Therapeutics, complemented by potential emerging players like Teva and regional CMOs. Manufacturers' roles extend beyond raw material production to include complex chemical synthesis, rigorous quality controls, and regulatory compliance. Stakeholders must emphasize supply chain diversification, compliance vigilance, and strategic partnerships to sustain market stability and advance patient access.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Dominance: United Therapeutics currently holds exclusive control over treprostinil sodium API production, underscoring its strategic importance.
  • Emerging Competitors: Teva and regional Asian manufacturers are positioned to introduce competitive options pending regulatory approvals and licensing agreements.
  • Supply Chain Vulnerability: High manufacturing complexity increases dependence on a limited supplier base, necessitating proactive diversification strategies.
  • Regulatory Stringency: Compliance with GMP and global regulatory standards is non-negotiable, influencing supplier qualification and partnership decisions.
  • Market Expansion: Innovations in synthesis processes and strategic licensing can expand supply capacity, reduce costs, and enhance global availability.

FAQs

1. Who is the primary supplier of treprostinil sodium API?
United Therapeutics is the main manufacturer and supplier of treprostinil sodium API, holding exclusive rights and manufacturing capacity for commercial use.

2. Are there generic suppliers of treprostinil sodium?
Yes, companies like Teva are authorized to produce generic versions, offering alternative sources subject to licensing, patent status, and regulatory approval.

3. What challenges do new suppliers face entering the treprostinil sodium market?
They encounter high barriers such as complex chemical synthesis, stringent regulatory requirements, GMP certification, quality assurance standards, and establishing production scaleability.

4. How does regulatory compliance affect treprostinil sodium supply?
Regulatory standards directly influence manufacturing practices, ensuring drug safety, efficacy, and quality, which is vital given the molecule's narrow therapeutic margin.

5. What strategic steps can companies take to secure treprostinil sodium supply?
Diversifying supplier bases, entering licensing agreements, investing in process development, and maintaining compliance with international standards are pivotal strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Remodulin (treprostinil) injection approval; 2002.
  2. Market Intelligence Reports on Pulmonary Hypertension Drugs; 2022.
  3. United Therapeutics Corporate Reports; 2023.
  4. Teva Pharmaceutical Annual Reports; 2022.
  5. WHO Global Drug Supply Trends; 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.