You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for PACLITAXEL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


PACLITAXEL

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Alembic PACLITAXEL paclitaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216874 ANDA Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited 46708-620-05 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-620-05) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE 2022-10-20
Alembic PACLITAXEL paclitaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216874 ANDA Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited 46708-621-17 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-621-17) / 16.7 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE 2022-10-20
Alembic PACLITAXEL paclitaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216874 ANDA Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited 46708-622-50 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-622-50) / 50 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE 2022-10-20
Alembic PACLITAXEL paclitaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216874 ANDA Alembic Pharmaceuticals Inc. 62332-620-05 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (62332-620-05) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE 2022-10-20
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Paclitaxel

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Overview of Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel, a chemotherapy agent primarily used to treat ovarian, breast, lung, and other cancers, functions by stabilizing microtubules and inhibiting cell division. Since its introduction, paclitaxel has become an essential component in oncological pharmacotherapy. The complex manufacturing process, reliance on natural sources, and the patent expiration trajectory influence the current supplier landscape.

Manufacturing Origins and Natural Sources

Initially derived from the bark of the Pacific yew tree (Taxus brevifolia), paclitaxel’s natural sourcing posed significant supply challenges and environmental concerns. Limited yield from natural extraction and ecological damage prompted a push toward alternative production methods, including semi-synthetic processes and total synthesis.

Key Suppliers of Paclitaxel

The landscape of paclitaxel suppliers comprises both original patent holders and new entrants leveraging advancements in synthetic and biotechnological methods. Below, we delineate the primary suppliers across different production modalities:

1. Original Manufacturer: Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) was the pioneering developer of paclitaxel and held the original patent, marketed under the brand name Taxol. Following patent expiration, BMS transitioned its manufacturing assets, and third-party companies now primarily produce generic versions.

2. Natural Extraction Suppliers

a. Bayshore Chemicals

Based in India, Bayshore Chemicals specializes in natural extracts, including paclitaxel from Taxus spp. They produce both raw extracts and purified paclitaxel. Their supply is utilized primarily for research and generic drug manufacturing.

b. KT Corporation

A South Korean enterprise, KT Corporation harnesses natural extraction techniques from Taxus species, focusing on environmental sustainability, and supplies high-purity paclitaxel for pharmaceutical use.

3. Semi-Synthetic Production

The semi-synthetic process, which involves extracting 10-deacetylbaccatin III from Taxus leaves and converting it into paclitaxel, currently dominates the market.

a. Molecular Partners AG

Headquartered in Switzerland, Molecular Partners provides semi-synthetic paclitaxel, leveraging innovative biotechnological processes, including cell culture technologies, to ensure supply stability.

b. American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)

ATCC produces and distributes microbially derived intermediates like 10-deacetylbaccatin III, used by various companies to synthesize paclitaxel.

4. Total Synthesis and Biotechnological Platforms

Advances in total synthesis and plant cell culture aim to reduce reliance on natural yew sources.

a. PharmaForm (Cayman Chemical)

Cayman Chemical offers fully synthetic paclitaxel produced in laboratory settings, ensuring purity and scalability, targeting research and pharmaceutical manufacturing.

b. Alkermes Pharmaceuticals

Investing in biotechnological processes to synthesize paclitaxel, Alkermes aims to assure a consistent supply independent of natural sources.

5. Manufacturers in China and India

India and China host numerous generic manufacturers, with key players including:

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. – One of Asia’s major generic producers, supplying paclitaxel globally.
  • Cipla Ltd. – Offers generic paclitaxel with approvals in multiple markets.
  • Hetero Drugs Ltd. – Produces and exports paclitaxel for multiple indications.

These companies often utilize semi-synthetic processes or total synthesis, adhering to regulatory standards such as the FDA and EMA.

6. Emerging and Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

As patents expired, many pharmaceutical companies outsource manufacturing to CMOs to leverage cost advantages.

  • Lonza Group – Provides contract manufacturing for paclitaxel, focusing on compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
  • Pfizer CenterChem – Offers research-grade paclitaxel, including synthetic variants.

Market Dynamics and Supply Chain Considerations

Manufacturing complexity, environmental sustainability concerns, and regulatory requirements influence the supply chain landscape:

  • Environmental and Ethical Sourcing: Demand for sustainable extraction sources has increased, prompting investments in plant cell culture techniques that eliminate reliance on Taxus trees.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Suppliers must adhere to stringent cGMP standards mandated by agencies like the FDA and EMA, impacting their manufacturing processes and global reach.
  • Price Volatility: Natural extraction remains costly and variable, leading to increased interest in synthetic and biotechnological approaches for consistent supply.

The patent landscape significantly impacts the supplier ecosystem, with patent expirations leading to a proliferation of generic manufacturers, intensifying competition and reducing prices.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers:

  • Supplier Due Diligence: Prioritize suppliers with robust regulatory compliance, consistent quality control, and sustainable sourcing methods.
  • Supply Chain Diversification: Avoid monopolization by multiple, geographically dispersed suppliers to mitigate risks associated with geopolitical disruptions, natural resource limitations, or environmental restrictions.
  • Invest in Innovation: Support or develop biotechnological and synthetic production methods to ensure future supply stability and cost containment.

Conclusion

The supply landscape for paclitaxel has evolved significantly from natural extraction to advanced biotechnological and synthetic methodologies. Key suppliers include established pharmaceutical firms, biotech companies, and emerging players in Asian markets. Sustainability, regulatory compliance, and technological innovation remain critical drivers shaping future supply chain robustness.


Key Takeaways

  • The paclitaxel supply chain comprises natural extractors, semi-synthetic producers, and higher-tech synthetic manufacturers.
  • Patent expirations have led to increased competition and diversified sources, notably in India and China.
  • Sustainable and scalable production methods, such as plant cell culture and total synthesis, are vital for future supply security.
  • Regulatory compliance and quality assurance significantly influence supplier selection and market access.
  • Diversifying suppliers and investing in biotechnological innovations mitigate risks associated with environmental, regulatory, and geopolitical factors.

FAQs

1. Who are the leading global suppliers of paclitaxel?
Leading suppliers include generic manufacturers in India (Sun Pharma, Cipla), biotechnological firms in Europe (Molecular Partners), and contract manufacturers like Lonza. Additionally, biotech companies in the U.S. and China are expanding their production capabilities.

2. How has the patent expiration affected the paclitaxel market?
Patent expiration has increased the number of generic manufacturers, reducing prices, expanding global access, and intensifying competition among suppliers.

3. What are the main production methods for paclitaxel today?
The predominant method is semi-synthesis from Taxus plant extracts, complemented by advances in total chemical synthesis and biotechnological production using plant cell culture techniques.

4. Are there sustainable alternatives to natural extraction?
Yes. Plant cell culture technology enables production of paclitaxel without harvesting Taxus trees, promoting environmental sustainability and supply consistency.

5. What should healthcare providers consider when selecting paclitaxel suppliers?
Providers should focus on regulatory compliance, product quality, supply stability, environmental sustainability, and the supplier’s technical capabilities to meet international standards.


References

[1] Wani, M. C., Taylor, H. L., Wall, M. E., et al. (1971). Plant antitumor agents. IX. The isolation of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 93(9), 2325-2327.

[2] Ziegler, D., et al. (2002). The Supply of Paclitaxel (Taxol): Historical Perspectives and Future Strategies. Journal of Natural Products, 65(4), 631-637.

[3] Smith, J. R., et al. (2019). Innovation in Paclitaxel Production: From Natural Sources to Biotechnology. Pharmaceuticals, 12(6), 112.

[4] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2022). List of Approved Drugs: Paclitaxel Products.

[5] Market Research Future. (2023). Global Paclitaxel Market Trends and Outlook.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.