Share This Page
Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: PACLITAXEL
✉ Email this page to a colleague
PACLITAXEL
Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | NDA/ANDA | Supplier | Package Code | Package | Marketing Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alembic | PACLITAXEL | paclitaxel | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 216874 | ANDA | Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited | 46708-620-05 | 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-620-05) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE | 2022-10-20 |
| Alembic | PACLITAXEL | paclitaxel | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 216874 | ANDA | Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited | 46708-621-17 | 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-621-17) / 16.7 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE | 2022-10-20 |
| Alembic | PACLITAXEL | paclitaxel | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 216874 | ANDA | Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited | 46708-622-50 | 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE in 1 CARTON (46708-622-50) / 50 mL in 1 VIAL, MULTI-DOSE | 2022-10-20 |
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >NDA/ANDA | >Supplier | >Package Code | >Package | >Marketing Start |
Pharmaceutical Paclitaxel: Key Suppliers and Procurement Map
Who supplies paclitaxel to the pharmaceutical supply chain?
Paclitaxel (drug substance and, in some cases, formulated drug product) is sourced from a mix of specialty APIs, generic injectables supply chains, and custom manufacturing networks. In practice, most procurement flows from API manufacturers, contract manufacturers (for semi-finished bulk), or finished-product registrants that source from controlled upstream API supply.
What supplier types dominate paclitaxel supply?
Paclitaxel supply is concentrated in four supplier categories:
-
API manufacturers (drug substance)
Provide paclitaxel as sterile or non-sterile API bulk for formulation into injectable and other dosage forms. -
Semi-finished bulk and sterile manufacturing partners
Handle drug-product manufacturing steps requiring sterile processes, controlled particle limits, and validated aseptic filling. -
Finished drug product manufacturers (injectables)
Sell registered strengths and presentations (often via generic or branded product dossiers), typically sourcing API from one or more qualified API suppliers. -
Specialty chemical and intermediates suppliers (upstream)
Provide key intermediates and raw materials used to synthesize paclitaxel, which can affect lead times and capacity risk.
Which suppliers are established in paclitaxel’s market?
The paclitaxel market is supplied by multiple global manufacturers. The list below covers commonly cited API and injectables supply participants used in procurement and dossier-based sourcing.
Common paclitaxel API and drug-product supply participants
| Supplier | Supplier type in practice | Likely role in paclitaxel supply chain | Where it shows up in procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandoz | Finished product / generics | Supplies paclitaxel injectable offerings in multiple markets | Through finished-product distributors and tenders |
| Hospira (Pfizer) | Finished product | Historical branded/market supply for paclitaxel injectables | Through hospital distribution and tender channels |
| Teva | Finished product / generics | Paclitaxel injectable supply via generic programs | Through registered product channels |
| Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories | Finished product / generics | Injectable paclitaxel programs in multiple jurisdictions | Through distributors and tenders |
| Mylan (Upjohn/Viatris) | Finished product / generics | Paclitaxel injectable supply in generic channels | Through distributor and hospital procurement |
| Accord Healthcare | Finished product / generics | Paclitaxel injectable supply lines | Through regional tender/distributor networks |
API-level sourcing realities
Paclitaxel API supply is tighter than many commodity APIs because the molecule has:
- High manufacturing complexity
- Strong regulatory expectations for impurity profiling, residual solvents, and sterility assurance for final products
- Batch-to-batch consistency requirements driven by oncology dosing and clinical risk tolerance
Procurement teams typically qualify at least two upstream API sources for continuity, but qualification depth varies by tender rules and national dossier structures.
How to map paclitaxel procurement to supplier qualification and lead-time risk
Procurement for paclitaxel usually follows a qualification pattern:
- Step 1: finished-product qualification (for hospital tenders and formulary uptake)
- Step 2: upstream API verification through controlled supplier lists, CoAs, DMFs/ASMFs where applicable, and change-control history
- Step 3: alternates for continuity under supply disruptions
Qualification checkpoints procurement teams use
| Checkpoint | What procurement verifies | Why it matters for paclitaxel |
|---|---|---|
| API impurity profile | Known genotoxic/critical impurities, batch uniformity | Drives clinical and regulatory acceptability |
| Sterile manufacturing controls | Aseptic process validation and environmental controls | Paclitaxel injectables are risk sensitive |
| Particle controls | Sub-visible particle limits and filtration performance | Injectable oncology dosing |
| Solvent and residual limits | Residual solvents and endotoxin/bioburden controls | Compliance and patient safety |
| Change-control history | Evidence of controlled changes to synthesis routes or purification | Prevents formulation instability or impurity drift |
What dosage-form suppliers typically dominate demand?
In most jurisdictions, the practical procurement unit is the paclitaxel injectable (commonly with solvent systems in the formulation). That shifts market power toward finished-product manufacturers and sterile fill-finish partners, even when API is the real constraint.
Where supplier selection usually matters most
Supplier selection becomes decisive when:
- A tender requires a specific presentation and national registration
- A manufacturer’s supply chain shifts (API substitution, solvent system changes, or filling site changes)
- Sterile manufacturing capacity is constrained
- Distribution contracts lock in lead-time and forecast commitments
Procurement action: how buyers structure supplier redundancy
Most buyers mitigate paclitaxel supply risk using a two-layer redundancy model:
-
Layer 1: finished-product redundancy
Qualify multiple distributors/manufacturers to preserve tender continuity. -
Layer 2: upstream redundancy
Require that each finished-product option uses qualified API sources with acceptable change-control records.
This structure is particularly important for oncology injectables where substitution is clinically constrained.
Key Takeaways
- Paclitaxel supply is dominated by qualified injectable supply chains, so procurement power often sits with finished-product manufacturers and sterile fill-finish networks, even though API is the upstream constraint.
- Supplier qualification focuses on impurity control, sterile manufacturing assurance, particle controls, and change-control stability.
- Buyers mitigate availability risk with redundancy at two levels: finished-product options and upstream API qualification.
FAQs
-
Is paclitaxel typically purchased as API or as finished injectable?
Buyers usually procure paclitaxel as a registered injectable product for hospital use, even when upstream API qualification is the underlying constraint. -
Why does paclitaxel face more supply tightness than many other oncology drugs?
The molecule requires complex manufacturing with stringent impurity and sterile process expectations. -
What supplier categories should a buyer qualify for paclitaxel continuity?
Finished-product manufacturers (and their sterile sites) plus at least two qualified upstream API sources via verification and change-control review. -
What quality attributes matter most for paclitaxel injectables?
Impurity profile, sterile manufacturing controls, particle limits, endotoxin/bioburden, and residual solvent compliance. -
How do tender requirements affect supplier choice for paclitaxel?
National registration, packaging strength, and presentation requirements often determine acceptable substitutions more than raw API equivalence.
References
[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Safety Communications and labeling information for paclitaxel-containing products. https://www.fda.gov/
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). EPAR and related documentation for paclitaxel-containing medicinal products. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubChem Compound Summary for Paclitaxel. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
More… ↓
