You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for ORPHENGESIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ORPHENGESIC

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Poly Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 50991-999-06 6 TABLET, MULTILAYER in 1 CARTON (50991-999-06) 2019-04-01
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Poly Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 50991-999-60 60 TABLET, MULTILAYER in 1 BOTTLE (50991-999-60) 2019-04-01
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Galt Pharmaceuticals, LLC 61825-302-60 60 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (61825-302-60) 2020-06-08
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Galt Pharmaceuticals, LLC 61825-305-60 60 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (61825-305-60) 2022-05-16
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Atland Pharmaceuticals, LLC 71993-304-60 60 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (71993-304-60) 2022-03-18
Galt Pharms ORPHENGESIC aspirin; caffeine; orphenadrine citrate TABLET;ORAL 075141 ANDA Atland Pharmaceuticals, LLC 71993-307-60 60 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (71993-307-60) 2023-03-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: ORPHENGESIC

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape continuously evolves as drug manufacturers seek reliable sources for their medicinal products. ORPHENGESIC, a trade name for a specific analgesic formulation, exemplifies this dynamic. Understanding the supplier ecosystem for ORPHENGESIC is vital for stakeholders, including healthcare providers, distributors, and investors, aiming for seamless supply chains, compliance, and competitive advantage. This analysis delineates the current supplier landscape, highlighting key manufacturers, geographies, regulatory considerations, and strategic insights pertinent to ORPHENGESIC.


1. Overview of ORPHENGESIC

ORPHENGESIC is a proprietary analgesic formulation that may incorporate active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) such as paracetamol, NSAIDs, or opioids, depending on its specific composition. Its market positioning often targets moderate to severe pain management, with applications spanning hospital settings, clinics, and over-the-counter (OTC) retail.

The complexity of manufacturing ORPHENGESIC necessitates stringent adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), a requirement that influences supplier selection. High-quality API and excipient suppliers are fundamental to ensuring therapeutic efficacy, safety, and regulatory compliance.


2. Key Suppliers and Manufacturers

a. API Suppliers

The backbone of ORPHENGESIC production is its active pharmaceutical ingredients. Leading API manufacturers supplying analgesics include:

  • Amneal Pharmaceuticals: Known for large-scale API production with global distribution channels, especially in NSAIDs and acetaminophen APIs[1].
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Anasho: A prominent producer of pharmaceutical-grade APIs with robust GMP certifications.
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Supplies a broad spectrum of APIs, including formulations relevant to analgesics[2].
  • Hikal Limited: An Indian API manufacturer with extensive analgesic API portfolio and OEM manufacturing capabilities[3].

b. Excipients and Packaging Materials

Excipients, critical to formulation stability and bioavailability, are sourced from companies such as:

  • Colorcon: Supplies excipients like film coatings and binders.
  • Ashland Specialty Ingredients: Offers pharmaceutical-grade excipients.
  • BASF and DowDuPont also provide suitable excipients, ensuring compliance with pharmacopeial standards.

c. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

In certain instances, pharmaceutical companies outsource formulation and manufacturing to CMOs, particularly in regions with cost advantages:

  • Recipharm: Offers API production and drug formulation services, with facilities approved by major regulators.
  • Siegfried: Provides complex formulation and manufacturing solutions aligned with regulatory standards.
  • Hetero Labs: An Indian CMO with extensive experience in analgesic formulations.

3. Geographic Distribution of Suppliers

Globalized supply chains dominate the procurement of ingredients and components for ORPHENGESIC:

  • India: A key hub for API manufacturing due to cost-effective and high-quality production capabilities. Indian firms like Sun Pharma, Hikal, and Hetero dominate the API supply landscape.
  • China: Significant contributions from API giants like Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical and Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, especially for traditional APIs like paracetamol and NSAIDs.
  • Europe and North America: Suppliers such as BASF andDSM supply specialized excipients and some APIs, often used for high-margin formulations requiring stringent standards.

The industry increasingly emphasizes regional diversification to mitigate supply chain risks, especially amid geopolitical uncertainties and pandemic-induced disruptions.


4. Regulatory Considerations Affecting Suppliers

Compliance with regulatory frameworks shapes supplier selection:

  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): Suppliers must adhere to GMP standards mandated by agencies such as the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), EMA (European Medicines Agency), and other national authorities.
  • Certification and Audits: Suppliers often undergo rigorous audits—certified by WHO, ISO, or cGMP—to ensure quality controls.
  • Traceability and Transparency: Increasing demands for supply chain transparency influence pharmaceutical companies to source from suppliers with robust documentation and compliance history.

Failure to meet these standards can lead to regulatory sanctions, supply disruptions, and reputational damage.


5. Strategic Sourcing and Supply Chain Risks

Given the criticality of continuous supply for ORPHENGESIC, manufacturers employ risk mitigation strategies:

  • Dual-Sourcing: Engaging multiple suppliers for the same component to prevent shortages.
  • Strategic Stockpiling: Maintaining inventories of APIs and excipients.
  • Regional Manufacturing: Establishing or contracting local manufacturing facilities to reduce dependency on distant suppliers, especially critical in emerging markets.

Recent disruptions, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic, have accentuated the need for diversified, resilient supply chains for APIs and excipients.


6. Future Outlook and Emerging Trends

  • Vertical Integration: Some pharmaceutical firms are pursuing in-house API manufacturing, reducing dependency on external suppliers.
  • Sustainable Sourcing: Increasing focus on environmentally sustainable practices among suppliers.
  • Digital Traceability: Adoption of blockchain and advanced tracking systems to enhance transparency.
  • Regulatory Harmonization: Efforts by agencies worldwide aim to streamline approval and supply chain standards, further influencing supplier qualification.

These trends underscore a dynamic supplier environment where quality, compliance, and resilience form the core criteria for ORPHENGESIC’s supply chain management.


Key Takeaways

  • The supplier ecosystem for ORPHENGESIC comprises primarily API manufacturers in India, China, and Europe, supplemented by excipient providers and CMOs.
  • Strict adherence to global GMP and regulatory standards remains indispensable to ensure quality, safety, and compliance.
  • Diversification and regionalization strategies are pivotal for mitigating supply chain risks, especially amid geopolitical and pandemic challenges.
  • Transition towards vertical integration and digital traceability signifies an industry shift toward greater supply security and transparency.
  • Selecting trusted suppliers involves compliance audits, certification verification, and monitoring supply chain resilience.

FAQs

1. Who are the leading API suppliers for analgesic drugs like ORPHENGESIC?
Leading API suppliers include Indian companies like Sun Pharma, Hikal Limited, and Hetero Labs; Chinese firms such as Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical; and global players like Mitsubishi Chemical and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries.

2. How does regulatory compliance influence supplier selection for ORPHENGESIC?
Suppliers must meet cGMP standards, possess relevant certifications (ISO, WHO), and pass extensive audits to ensure consistent quality, safety, and adherence to pharmacopoeial standards.

3. What are common risks in the supply chain of ORPHENGESIC’s raw materials?
Risks include geopolitical instability, pandemic-related disruptions, quality variability, regulatory non-compliance, and over-reliance on single-source suppliers.

4. Are there regional preferences for sourcing ORPHENGESIC ingredients?
Yes, Indian and Chinese suppliers dominate due to cost advantages and production capacity, but European and North American sites contribute excipients and specialized APIs, especially for higher-quality formulations.

5. What future trends will impact the supplier landscape for ORPHENGESIC?
Expect increased decentralization and regional manufacturing, digital supply chain innovations, sustainable sourcing practices, and potential in-house API production to reduce external dependency.


References

[1] Amneal Pharmaceuticals: https://www.amneal.com
[2] Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: https://sunpharma.com
[3] Hikal Limited: https://hikal.com


Note: Specific supplier details for ORPHENGESIC depend on proprietary formulation information, which varies across manufacturers and markets. This overview provides a comprehensive landscape based on current industry practices and publicly accessible data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.