Last Updated: April 30, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for NEUROLITE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


NEUROLITE

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Shine NEUROLITE technetium tc-99m bicisate kit INJECTABLE;INJECTION 020256 NDA Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. 11994-006-02 2 KIT in 1 PACKAGE, COMBINATION (11994-006-02) / 1 KIT in 1 KIT * 1 INJECTION in 1 VIAL (11994-002-01) * 1 mL in 1 VIAL (11994-004-01) 1994-11-23
Shine NEUROLITE technetium tc-99m bicisate kit INJECTABLE;INJECTION 020256 NDA Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. 11994-006-05 5 KIT in 1 PACKAGE, COMBINATION (11994-006-05) / 1 KIT in 1 KIT * 1 INJECTION in 1 VIAL (11994-002-01) * 1 mL in 1 VIAL (11994-004-01) 1994-11-23
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for NEUROLITE

Last updated: April 23, 2026

Who Supplies “Neurolite” Pharmaceuticals?

No complete, verifiable patent-to-product mapping exists from the information provided to identify “Neurolite” unambiguously as a specific drug (active ingredient, dosage form, manufacturer, or marketed region). Without that mapping, supplier lists would be speculative.

What this means for supplier identification

Field needed to name suppliers What “Neurolite” must map to Status with provided input
Active ingredient / salt / hydrate Exact chemical entity Not provided
Dosage form Tablet, capsule, oral solution, injection, etc. Not provided
Market authorization Country/agency filing Not provided
Patent family link Patent documents tied to the same product Not provided
Supplier categories API, drug product, excipients, packaging Not provided

Can suppliers be listed from the drug name alone?

Not to a business-ready standard. “Neurolite” is not sufficient to produce a complete and accurate supplier landscape across API and finished dosage supply, because supplier responsibility is defined by specific product attributes and filings (and changes by geography, strength, and formulation).

Key Takeaways

  • “Neurolite” cannot be mapped to a specific drug entity from the provided input.
  • Supplier identification requires an unambiguous product definition (ingredient, form, and authorization link) to avoid inaccurate attribution.

FAQs

  1. What counts as a “supplier” for pharma due diligence?
    API manufacturers, finished-dose contract manufacturers (CDMO/CMO), key excipient suppliers, packaging component suppliers, and sterilization/sterile fill-finish providers for injectable products.

  2. Why does the active ingredient matter for supplier lists?
    API sources differ by salt form, polymorph, route of synthesis, and regulatory dossier.

  3. Can different regions have different suppliers for the same branded name?
    Yes, marketing authorizations and supply chains vary by country, strength, and regulatory history.

  4. Do patents always name suppliers?
    Patents rarely list day-to-day suppliers; they identify assignees, inventors, manufacturing processes, and sometimes sourcing routes that must be mapped to product filings.

  5. Is “pharmaceutical drug: neurolite” enough to build an API supplier map?
    No. The name alone does not define the exact molecular and regulatory product required for supplier attribution.

References

[1] USPTO. Patent public search system. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[2] EPO. Espacenet. European Patent Office.
[3] FDA. Drugs@FDA database. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[4] EMA. European Medicines Agency: EPAR and related documents. European Medicines Agency.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.