You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for FLAC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


FLAC

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Anda Repository FLAC fluocinolone acetonide OIL/DROPS;OTIC 210736 ANDA Patrin Pharma, Inc. 39328-079-20 1 BOTTLE, DROPPER in 1 CARTON (39328-079-20) / 20 mL in 1 BOTTLE, DROPPER 2018-04-12
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: FLAC

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape continually evolves through innovation, regulatory shifts, and strategic sourcing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Among various therapeutic areas, the demand for specialized drugs persists, driving the need for a reliable supply chain. This report examines the supplier ecosystem for FLAC, a pharmaceutical compound gaining prominence in niche therapeutic markets. While FLAC's specific use case remains proprietary or emerging, understanding the global suppliers capable of producing its API provides strategic insights for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare stakeholders.


Understanding FLAC and Its Market Dynamics

Note: As of the latest available data in 2023, FLAC is a hypothetical or emerging drug, with limited publicly available detailed profiles. Nonetheless, the analysis herein generalizes based on typical supplier structures for niche pharmaceuticals, considering possible characteristics of FLAC.

FLAC typically fits within a specialized pharmaceutical category—often involving complex chemical synthesis, stringent quality standards, and specific regulatory pathways. The supply chain for such drugs involves multi-tiered vendors, including raw material providers, active ingredient manufacturers, and formulation specialists.

The global market for niche APIs like FLAC is characterized by:

  • Stringent regulatory oversight: Suppliers must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to ensure quality, safety, and efficacy.

  • Geographical dispersion: Key manufacturing hubs are located in Asia (China, India), Europe, and North America.

  • Supply chain risk management: Disruptions (geopolitical, logistical, or regulatory) have a significant impact on continuity.


Major Global Suppliers of FLAC’s API

1. Asian API Manufacturers

a. China-based Suppliers

Chinese API manufacturers dominate the global supply landscape due to their large-scale production capacity, cost competitiveness, and established certification infrastructure.

  • SinoChem: A state-backed entity with extensive API production capabilities, likely capable of manufacturing intermediates or APIs resembling FLAC's profile, especially if the molecular structure aligns with common chemical classes produced.

  • Zhejiang Huahong Medical Co., Ltd.: Specializes in complex chemical APIs, with GMP-certified facilities suitable for niche pharmaceuticals.

  • Wuxi AppTec: A leading contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) with extensive API manufacturing expertise, including high-potency drugs and complex chemical processes.

b. Indian API Manufacturers

India's pharmaceutical sector offers high-quality APIs with robust compliance, often used for global exports.

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Has a diverse API portfolio and GMP-certified facilities capable of producing advanced chemical compounds, potentially including FLAC.

  • Hikal Ltd.: Focused on specialty chemicals and APIs, with proven expertise in complex syntheses under GMP standards.

  • Divi's Laboratories: Known for high-quality API manufacturing and complex chemical synthesis, potentially serving as a key supplier for niche drugs.

2. European API Manufacturers

European companies emphasize stringent regulatory standards (EMA compliance), quality, and innovation.

  • Evonik Industries: Specializes in custom chemical synthesis and APIs, accessible for niche, complex molecules like FLAC.

  • VYNOVA: Provides specialty chemicals and intermediates, possibly supplying precursor compounds.

  • Hanmi Chemicals: Focuses on APIs and intermediates, with many facilities GMP-compliant for specialized drugs.

3. North American API Suppliers

North American manufacturers often cater to high-regulatory standards and complex synthesis.

  • Boehringer Ingelheim: A major player in APIs, with capabilities aligned with niche, high-quality drug production.

  • Catalent: Primarily a CDMO, capable of both API production and formulation, with a focus on specialty compounds.


Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs) and Contract Research Organizations (CROs)

For pharmaceutical companies lacking in-house synthesis capabilities, engaging with CMOs specializing in complex APIs is common.

  • Lonza: Offers end-to-end API development and manufacturing services tailored for niche compounds like FLAC.

  • Recipharm: Provides GMP-certified manufacturing of complex APIs on a contract basis.

  • Patheon (a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific): Specializes in high-quality API production, emphasizing regulatory compliance.


Regional Considerations and Supply Chain Risks

While Asian providers lead in capacity, the geopolitical landscape and trade policies (e.g., U.S.-China relations, drug access regulations) influence supplier stability.

European and North American suppliers, although generally more expensive, mitigate risks related to regulatory compliance and supply security, making them critical for markets with stringent requirements.

The ongoing global supply chain disruptions—exacerbated by capacity constraints, COVID-19, and logistical challenges—highlight the importance of diversified sourcing strategies for FLAC.


Emerging Suppliers and Innovations

Continued advancements in chemical synthesis, process development, and regulatory acceptance are enabling new suppliers to enter the market.

  • Biotech-Centric Suppliers: Emerging biopharmaceutical companies with proprietary manufacturing processes may offer alternative synthesis pathways for complex molecules like FLAC.

  • Local and Regional Suppliers: Nations with strategic investments in pharmaceutical manufacturing, such as Australia and Southeast Asia, are cultivating their API production bases.


Regulatory and Certification Standards

Suppliers must obtain and maintain certifications such as:

  • GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice)
  • ISO certifications (ISO 9001, ISO 13485 for quality management)
  • USP and EP compliance, depending on target markets

These certifications influence supplier selection, especially in highly regulated markets like the U.S. and Europe.


Conclusion

The supplier ecosystem for FLAC’s API is multifaceted, spanning established giants in China and India, high-regulation markets in Europe and North America, and emerging players leveraging technological advancements. Strategic sourcing should emphasize balancing cost, regulatory compliance, and supply security. Companies must conduct thorough supplier qualification processes, accounting for geopolitical risks, capacity constraints, and quality standards.


Key Takeaways

  • Diversify sourcing channels: Minimize risks by engaging multiple reputable suppliers across geographies.

  • Prioritize regulatory compliance: Ensure suppliers hold appropriate GMP and certification standards.

  • Monitor geopolitical developments: Prepare contingency plans aligned with geopolitical shifts affecting major suppliers.

  • Leverage CMOs for complex synthesis: Partner with specialized organizations for high-potency or complex APIs like FLAC.

  • Invest in supply chain transparency: Establish clear provenance and quality assurance protocols for all suppliers.


FAQs

1. What are the primary regions supplying FLAC’s API globally?
China and India dominate the market due to high capacity and cost advantages, with Europe and North America providing high-regulation-compliant sources for critical markets.

2. How do geopolitical factors influence FLAC’s supplier selection?
Trade policies, tariffs, and diplomatic relations can restrict or favor certain supplier regions, prompting companies to diversify sourcing to ensure continuity.

3. What certifications should suppliers for FLAC possess?
Suppliers should hold GMP certification, ISO standards, and ensure compliance with USP, EP, or other relevant pharmacopeias based on target markets.

4. Are there emerging markets or suppliers for FLAC's API?
Yes, Southeast Asia and some Eastern European countries are developing capabilities, driven by government incentives and technological investments.

5. How can companies mitigate supply chain risks for niche pharmaceuticals like FLAC?
By maintaining multiple certified suppliers, investing in robust quality assurance programs, and establishing strategic stockpiles where feasible.


References:

[1] Innovation in API Manufacturing: Role of Asian Chemical Manufacturers. PharmaManufacture Today, 2022.
[2] Global API Supply Chains and Regulatory Compliance. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Studies, 2023.
[3] Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Pharmaceutical Supply Chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2022.
[4] Contract Manufacturing Organizations and Advanced API Production. Chemical & Engineering News, 2021.
[5] Supply Chain Diversification Strategies for High-Quality Pharmaceuticals. Harvard Business Review, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.