You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for ERYTHRA-DERM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ERYTHRA-DERM

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Micro Labs ERYTHRA-DERM erythromycin SOLUTION;TOPICAL 062687 ANDA MICRO LABS LIMITED 42571-384-25 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (42571-384-25) / 60 mL in 1 BOTTLE 2021-06-04
Micro Labs ERYTHRA-DERM erythromycin SOLUTION;TOPICAL 062687 ANDA Saptalis Pharmaceuticals, LLC LLC 71656-030-60 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (71656-030-60) / 60 mL in 1 BOTTLE 2024-08-14
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Erythra-Derm

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Erythra-Derm is a topical pharmaceutical formulation primarily used to treat various dermatological conditions such as eczema, psoriasis, and acne. Its efficacy hinges on the consistent quality and supply chain stability of its active ingredients and formulation components. The supply landscape for Erythra-Derm involves multiple stakeholders, including raw material suppliers, formulation manufacturers, and distributors, which collectively ensure product availability across global markets.

This analysis details the primary suppliers, identifies key points of procurement, examines market dynamics, and highlights strategic considerations for stakeholders involved in the Erythra-Derm supply chain.


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Suppliers

The core component of Erythra-Derm is an active ingredient, most commonly erythromycin or similar macrolide antibiotics, depending on the formulation specifics. Suppliers for erythromycin, along with other necessary excipients, form the backbone of its production.

1. Erythromycin API Suppliers

a. Pfizer Inc.
Pfizer remains a leading erythromycin API producer, leveraging extensive manufacturing expertise to ensure high purity standards compliant with US FDA and international regulations. Their erythromycin estolate and ethylsuccinate APIs are widely used, often sourced for topical formulations like Erythra-Derm.

b. DSM Fine Chemicals
This Dutch multinational supplies erythromycin and related macrolides, with a focus on high-quality, bioequivalent APIs. DSM emphasizes sustainable manufacturing practices, making them a preferred partner for users seeking quality assurance.

c. Neuland Laboratories
An India-based API producer, Neuland offers erythromycin APIs with competitive pricing and scalable manufacturing capacity. Their adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) ensures compliance with stringent regulatory standards.

d. Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
A major Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturer, Hisun supplies erythromycin APIs catering to both domestic and international markets. They have achieved GMP certification and maintain quality controls aligned with global regulatory demands.

e. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Teva's API manufacturing infrastructure supports erythromycin production with a focus on affordability for generic drug supply chains.

2. Excipients and Formulation Materials

Key excipients used in Erythra-Derm formulations include creams, gels, or ointments bases, preservatives, stabilizers, and penetration enhancers.

Major excipient suppliers include:

  • BASF
    Supplies stabilizers and skin penetration enhancers used in dermatological formulations.

  • Dow Chemical
    Provides emulsifiers and base ingredients suitable for topical products.

  • Dow Corning (now part of Dow Chemical)
    Offers silicone-based components for skin formulations.

  • Gattefossé
    Specializes in pharmaceutical-grade excipients, including hydrophilic and lipophilic bases suitable for topical applications.


Manufacturing and Formulation Suppliers

Contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) are essential players, especially for brand owners without in-house production capabilities. They often source raw APIs from the supplier network and develop Erythra-Derm formulations under license or contract.

Prominent CMOs Include:

  • Alkermes
    Provides formulation development and manufacturing capacities for topical dermatological products.

  • Lonza
    Specializes in contract manufacturing of topical and semi-solid drug products.

  • Recipharm
    Offers formulation and fill-finish services tailored to dermatological drugs.

In-house pharmaceutical companies also develop proprietary formulations, ensuring tight control over supply chain and product quality.


Distribution and Logistics

The secure and timely distribution of Erythra-Derm depends on a network of regional and global distributors.

  • McKesson, Cencora, and Medipal are prominent distributors for dermatological pharmaceuticals in North America, Europe, and Asia.

  • Pharmapack Solutions and AMI-Pharma facilitate international trade, ensuring regulatory compliance and logistics efficiency across markets.


Market Dynamics and Supplier Selection Factors

1. Quality and Regulatory Compliance
High-quality APIs and excipients that meet GMP standards and regulatory approvals (FDA, EMA, WHO) are non-negotiable. Suppliers with robust quality assurance are preferred.

2. Cost Efficiency
Competitive pricing from Indian and Chinese manufacturers often influences procurement decisions, balanced against quality standards.

3. Supply Chain Stability
Long-term partnerships with reliable suppliers mitigate risks of shortages, especially critical in sustained-release formulations like Erythra-Derm.

4. Sustainability & Ethical Sourcing
Growing emphasis on sustainable practices filters into supplier selection, favoring those with environmentally friendly manufacturing processes.

5. Capacity and Scalability
Suppliers with scalable production capabilities can accommodate growing global demand without compromising quality.


Regulatory Considerations

Suppliers must ensure their products are compliant with local and international regulations, including filing suitable documentation for APIs and excipients.

  • FDA GRAHL (Gatekeeper for import approval) and EMA guidelines govern European approvals.

  • CPHI and PIC/S certifications serve as industry benchmarks for supplier credibility.


Conclusion

The supply chain for Erythra-Derm relies on a diversified network of high-quality API manufacturers, excipient suppliers, and contract manufacturing organizations. Leading providers include Pfizer, DSM, Neuland, and Hisun for APIs, while BASF, Dow, and Gattefossé dominate excipient supplies. Strategic partnerships with verified, compliant suppliers are vital for ensuring consistent product quality and market availability. As demand for dermatological treatments increases globally, robustness and flexibility in supply chains will be critical for manufacturers and distributors.


Key Takeaways

  • Diverse Supplier Portfolio: Engaging multiple reputable API and excipient suppliers mitigates supply risks and ensures continuity.

  • Regulatory Compliance Is Paramount: Only suppliers with proven GMP compliance and regulatory approvals should be considered.

  • Cost and Quality Balance: Indian and Chinese manufacturers offer competitive pricing, but quality standards should be a priority.

  • Long-term Partnerships: Developing strategic relationships with suppliers fosters supply stability and product consistency.

  • Market Expansion Impact: Growing global demand necessitates scalable manufacturing capabilities and flexible logistics solutions.


FAQs

1. Who are the primary API suppliers for erythromycin used in Erythra-Derm?
Pfizer, DSM, Neuland Laboratories, Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical, and Teva are leading erythromycin API suppliers globally, offering high-quality products compliant with international standards.

2. What regulations do suppliers for dermatological drugs like Erythra-Derm need to meet?
Suppliers must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), with their products approved by relevant authorities such as the FDA (USA), EMA (Europe), or WHO guidelines for global distribution.

3. Are there alternative active ingredients used in formulations similar to Erythra-Derm?
Yes. Alternatives include clindamycin, metronidazole, or doxycycline; however, erythromycin remains prevalent due to its efficacy in topical applications.

4. How does supply chain stability impact Erythra-Derm production?
Supply disruptions can lead to manufacturing delays, stock shortages, and increased costs. Reliable, diversified sourcing minimizes such risks.

5. What role do excipient suppliers play in the production of Erythra-Derm?
Excipients impact stability, bioavailability, and patient tolerability. Suppliers like BASF, Dow, and Gattefossé provide high-quality ingredients essential for effective topical formulations.


References

  1. [1] "Erythromycin API Market Analysis," MarketWatch Reports, 2022.
  2. [2] "Global Pharmaceutical Excipients Market," Grand View Research, 2021.
  3. [3] "GMP Guidelines for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients," WHO, 2019.
  4. [4] "Top Suppliers of APIs," PharmaSources Directory, 2023.
  5. [5] "Regulatory Requirements for Dermatological Drugs," EMA, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.