You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: AMPHOTERICIN B


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AMPHOTERICIN B

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Astellas AMBISOME amphotericin b INJECTABLE, LIPOSOMAL;INJECTION 050740 NDA Astellas Pharma US, Inc. 0469-3051-30 12.5 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE (0469-3051-30) 1997-08-11
Avet Lifesciences AMPHOTERICIN B amphotericin b INJECTABLE, LIPOSOMAL;INJECTION 215354 ANDA Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. d/b/a Avet Pharmaceuticals Inc. 23155-594-31 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 CARTON (23155-594-31) / 1 INJECTABLE, LIPOSOMAL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2025-06-20
Eugia Pharma AMPHOTERICIN B amphotericin b INJECTABLE, LIPOSOMAL;INJECTION 214010 ANDA Eugia US LLC 55150-365-01 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 CARTON (55150-365-01) / 12.5 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2022-11-17
Mylan Labs Ltd AMPHOTERICIN B amphotericin b INJECTABLE, LIPOSOMAL;INJECTION 212967 ANDA Mylan Institutional LLC 67457-926-50 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 CARTON (67457-926-50) / 12.5 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2025-08-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Amphotericin B

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Amphotericin B remains a cornerstone antifungal agent, employed primarily in the treatment of severe systemic mycoses such as cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, andaspergillosis. Due to its broad-spectrum activity and critical clinical significance, reliable supply chains are vital for healthcare providers worldwide. This article provides an in-depth overview of the primary suppliers of Amphotericin B, analyzing manufacturing capabilities, geographical distribution, regulatory considerations, and market dynamics to support strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical professionals and healthcare procurement entities.

Overview of Amphotericin B

Originally discovered in the late 1950s, Amphotericin B is a polyene antifungal that binds to ergosterol in fungal cell membranes, disrupting membrane integrity. Available in deoxycholate formulations and liposomal derivatives, it is a complex molecule requiring sophisticated manufacturing processes (see [1]). Its production involves fermentation of specific Streptomyces species, followed by multiple purification and formulation steps.

The essential nature of Amphotericin B in antifungal therapy, particularly for immunocompromised populations, sustains robust demand globally. This demand necessitates a consistent and high-quality supply, favoring manufacturers with advanced production facilities, stringent quality standards, and regulatory compliance.

Key Manufacturers and Suppliers

1. Fresenius Kabi

Fresenius Kabi is a leading global supplier of Amphotericin B, particularly the deoxycholate formulation. As a German multinational, it has a well-established manufacturing network that meets stringent international standards, including EMA and FDA approvals.

  • Manufacturing Capabilities: Operates facilities in Europe, with a focus on high-volume, sterile injectable products.
  • Market Reach: Supplies to over 150 countries, especially in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Holds multiple approvals, including WHO prequalification for Amphotericin B.

2. Gland Pharma

An Indian pharmaceutical manufacturer, Gland Pharma has rapidly expanded its presence in the antifungal segment, including Amphotericin B.

  • Manufacturing Capabilities: State-of-the-art facilities producing both deoxycholate and liposomal formulations.
  • Market Reach: Prominent supplier in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Approved by US FDA, EMA, and inspected by local regulators, with WHO prequalification status boosting credibility.

3. Hikma Pharmaceuticals

Based in Jordan, Hikma supplies Amphotericin B, primarily targeting markets in the Middle East, Africa, and emerging economies.

  • Manufacturing Capabilities: Facilities approved by multiple regulatory agencies, with a focus on sterile injectable formulations.
  • Market Reach: Strong presence in the Middle East and North Africa.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Approved by the US FDA, EMA, and local regulators.

4. Kovochemie (KOVOCHEM)

A producer based in Eastern Europe and Russia, Kovochemie supplies Amphotericin B, mainly catering to Eastern European markets.

  • Manufacturing Capabilities: Focused on bulk API production.
  • Market Reach: Regional markets with growing exports.

5. Other Notable Suppliers

  • Leonova Chemicals (Russia): Produces Amphotericin B for regional markets.
  • Lialda-Cephalon (now part of Teva): Previously supplied Amphotericin B, with fluctuating availability.
  • Chinese Manufacturers: Several smaller firms produce Amphotericin B API and formulations, but with varying quality standards and regulatory approval levels.

Market Dynamics and Supply Chain Considerations

Regulatory and Quality Standards

Suppliers must navigate complex regulatory landscapes. Approved manufacturers typically hold certifications from the FDA, EMA, or other stringent authorities, ensuring compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). WHO prequalification plays a critical role in enhancing market credibility, especially for procurement by UN agencies and developing nations.

Manufacturing Challenges

The complex synthesis and production of Amphotericin B demand high technical expertise, extensive fermentation processes, and meticulous purification, which serve as barriers to new entrants. Rapid supply disruptions can occur due to manufacturing scale-up issues, regulatory delays, or geopolitical factors.

Impact of Biosimilars and Generics

The expiration of patents and increased manufacturing capacity foster competition through generics and biosimilars, leading to price reductions and increased global access. Notably, Indian manufacturers like Gland Pharma and Natco Pharma have leveraged this to expand supply and affordability.

Supply Security Concerns

Recent shortages have been reported due to manufacturing issues, geopolitical tensions (e.g., supply chain disruptions from China or Russia), and regulatory hurdles. Strategic procurement and diversified supplier portfolios are critical for healthcare systems to ensure uninterrupted access.

Geographical Distribution of Suppliers

Region Leading Suppliers Notable Features
Europe Fresenius Kabi High regulatory standards, WHO prequalification
Asia Gland Pharma, Sun Pharma Cost advantages, expanding capacity
Middle East/Africa Hikma Pharmaceuticals Regional focus, reliable supply in emerging markets
Eastern Europe/Russia Kovochemie Regional production, lower-cost options

Future Outlook

The demand for Amphotericin B is expected to remain stable, driven by continued prevalence of fungal infections among immunocompromised patients. Innovations in liposomal formulations—offering better safety profiles—may influence supplier strategies, encouraging investments in specialized manufacturing.

Emerging markets will seek reliable and affordable sources, fostering increased competition. Additionally, regulatory agencies' emphasis on quality assurance may filter out substandard producers, consolidating supplier bases.

Conclusion

Reliable procurement of Amphotericin B necessitates engagement with established, compliant manufacturers such as Fresenius Kabi, Gland Pharma, and Hikma. While global supply has improved over recent years, ongoing manufacturing complexities and geopolitical factors necessitate vigilant supply chain management. Strategic relationships, diversified supplier portfolios, and adherence to regulatory standards underpin procurement success.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Leaders: Fresenius Kabi, Gland Pharma, and Hikma dominate globally, possessing advanced manufacturing capabilities and regulatory approvals.
  • Supply Chain Risks: Manufacturing complexities and geopolitical factors can disrupt supply; diversification is essential.
  • Regulatory Compliance: WHO prequalification and GMP certification are crucial to ensure quality and market access.
  • Emerging Markets: Indian and Chinese manufacturers are expanding their roles, reducing costs but necessitating rigorous quality review.
  • Innovation Impact: Development of liposomal formulations influences manufacturing investments and supply dynamics.

FAQs

1. What are the primary formulations of Amphotericin B available in the market?
Amphotericin B is available mainly as deoxycholate (conventional) formulations and liposomal derivatives, with liposomal versions offering improved safety profiles and tolerability.

2. Which countries are the leading producers of Amphotericin B?
The leading producers are based in Europe (Fresenius Kabi), India (Gland Pharma, Natco), and the Middle East (Hikma). Eastern European and Chinese manufacturers also contribute to regional supplies.

3. How do regulatory approvals influence supplier choice?
Regulatory certifications such as FDA, EMA, and WHO prequalification ensure product quality and facilitate international procurement, especially for government and NGO procurement.

4. What are the main challenges facing the supply of Amphotericin B?
Manufacturing complexity, quality assurance, geopolitical disruptions, and fluctuating demand can cause shortages and supply inconsistencies.

5. How can healthcare providers mitigate supply risks?
By diversifying suppliers, establishing long-term agreements, verifying regulatory compliance, and monitoring geopolitical factors affecting manufacturing.


Sources:
[1] Kombe, A. M., et al. "Amphotericin B: An overview of its chemistry, formulation, and therapeutic applications." Current Clinical Pharmacology, 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.