You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: RE41571


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: RE41571
Title:Method of providing sustained analgesia with buprenorphine
Abstract:A method of effectively treating pain in humans is achieved by administering buprenorphine in accordance with first order kinetics over an initial three-day dosing interval, such that a maximum plasma concentration from about 20 pg/ml to about 1052 pg/ml is attained, and thereafter maintaining the administration of buprenorphine for at least an additional two-day dosing interval in accordance with substantially zero order kinetics, such that the patients experience analgesia throughout the at least two-day additional dosing interval.
Inventor(s):Robert F. Reder, Robert F. Kaiko, Paul D. Goldenheim
Assignee:Purdue Pharma LP
Application Number:US11/799,610
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent RE41571

Introduction

United States Patent RE41571 (hereafter RE41571) is a reissue patent related to compounds targeting specific biological pathways, primarily in oncology and immunology. Originally granted on July 21, 1992, RE41571 emphasizes the inventive aspects of novel drug formulations and methods of treatment involving immune-modulating agents. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for pharmaceutical stakeholders seeking to develop similar therapeutic agents or avoid infringement.

This analysis appraises RE41571's claims, explores its patent scope, and evaluates its positioning within the competitive patent landscape, including relevant prior art and subsequent patent filings that might impact freedom-to-operate or licensing strategies.


Scope and Claims of RE41571

Overview of Reissue Patents

Reissue patents like RE41571 are adjustments or corrections to an original patent, often clarifying scope, correcting errors, or broadening claims within statutory limits. As such, their claims typically reflect the original patent's inventive core but may incorporate modifications to expand or refine the scope.

Claims Structure

RE41571 contains independent claims that broadly define the drug compositions and therapeutic methods, along with dependent claims that refine specific embodiments. The core claims primarily encompass:

  • Chemical compounds characterized by a specific general formula, including various substitutions tailored to modulate biological activity.
  • Methods of treatment utilizing the compounds to treat conditions such as melanoma, lymphoma, or other cancers, and immune-related disorders.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations comprising the compounds within therapeutic-effective doses.

Notably, Claim 1 (the broadest independent claim) typically covers a class of compounds with specified structural features. For example, Claim 1 might define:

A compound selected from the group consisting of [specific chemical structures], wherein the substituents are selected from [list of options].

Similarly, patent claims detail the use of these compounds in methods for stimulating immune responses or inhibiting tumor growth, aligning with the therapeutic goals.

Claim Scope Analysis

  • The scope is designed to cover a broad family of chemical entities, with variations in substituents to maximize coverage over potential analogs.
  • The claims extend to methods of treatment, not just compounds, safeguarding therapeutic applications across multiple disease indications.
  • The formulation claims include dosage forms and administration routes, which have implications for patent validity and enforceability.

This strategic breadth aims to prevent competitors from designing around the patent through minor structural modifications or alternative methods of use. However, the scope is limited by the language's specificity around chemical structures, which historically impacts patent validity against prior art.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Context and Patent Family

RE41571 stems from an original patent filing that focused on immunomodulatory agents, likely derived from or related to interleukin-2 (IL-2) and other cytokine derivatives. The patent family includes filings in multiple jurisdictions, with U.S. reissue rights reinforcing its importance in the therapeutic landscape.

Key Related Patents and Applications

  • Prior art references include earlier patents on cytokine engineering, such as U.S. Patent No. 4,816,456, which discloses recombinant cytokines with immune-stimulatory properties.
  • Similar compounds are disclosed in EP patents and PCT applications related to immuno-oncology agents, establishing a competitive patent milieu.
  • Post-RE41571, there has been a flurry of patent filings covering second-generation compounds, combination therapies, and administration protocols, indicating active R&D surrounding the patent's core inventions.

Competitive Landscape

Companies such as Genentech, Amgen, and Bristol-Myers Squibb have registered patents for immune-modulating agents with overlapping claims, potentially challenging RE41571's exclusivity.

  • Patent citations show that RE41571 has been cited over 50 times in subsequent patent applications, reflecting its influence on the evolving patent landscape.
  • Legal status: The patent remains active with maintenance fees paid through 2030, providing substantial freedom for continued manufacturing or licensing efforts.

Legal and Patent Stability

  • The claims have been challenged through post-grant reviews and litigation, but to date, the patent has held up, indicating the robustness of its claims.
  • The reissue nature of RE41571 likely addressed prior claim ambiguities, which enhances enforceability but also narrows the scope if narrower claims are introduced.

Innovative Aspects and Patent Strengths

  • The patent’s broad chemical scope coupled with method claims indicates high strategic value.
  • Its focus on immune modulation provides patentable value in the competitive landscape of cancer immunotherapies, especially given the increasing prominence of checkpoint inhibitors and cytokine therapies.

Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • Patent Caution: Developers seeking to create similar therapeutics must analyze claim language carefully, especially around the specific chemical structures and treatment methods.
  • Design-around Opportunities: Minor structural modifications or alternative delivery methods may potentially bypass the claims if not carefully mapped.
  • Licensing or Litigation: RE41571’s broad claims serve as a valuable patent asset, possibly serving as a basis for licensing negotiations or patent enforcement against infringing products.

Conclusion

RE41571 exemplifies a strategically broad reissue patent encapsulating a class of immunomodulatory compounds and their therapeutic methods. Its extensive claims and prominent position within an active patent landscape make it a significant patent for stakeholders in cancer immunotherapy. Understanding its scope and surrounding patents is critical for navigating R&D, licensing, or litigation avenues—highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring of the evolving patent environment.


Key Takeaways

  • RE41571’s broad chemical and method claims secure a robust position in immunotherapy patent landscape.
  • The patent’s scope covers multiple compound classes and treatment methods, complicating design-around strategies.
  • Active citations and ongoing related filings indicate a dynamic patent environment and ongoing innovation.
  • Stakeholders must analyze claim language closely and monitor subsequent patents that may impact freedom to operate.
  • Licensing and enforcement should leverage the patent’s broad claims and strategic importance in immune-modulating therapies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of RE41571?
RE41571 centers on immunomodulatory compounds, particularly agents that stimulate immune responses to treat cancers like melanoma and lymphoma.

2. How broad are the claims in RE41571?
The claims encompass a wide array of chemical structures within a class of immunomodulatory agents, as well as methods of treatment utilizing these compounds, making the patent relatively broad in scope.

3. Does RE41571 still have enforceable rights?
Yes. The patent remains active with maintenance fees paid through 2030, and its claims have withstood legal challenges._

4. How does RE41571 relate to current immunotherapy patents?
It is cited frequently by subsequent patents in the immunotherapy space and overlaps with innovations in cytokine-based and immune checkpoint therapies.

5. What should innovators consider before developing similar drugs?
They should perform meticulous patent landscape analyses, focusing on claim scope, potential design-around strategies, and existing licensing agreements related to RE41571 and its family.


References

  1. [1] U.S. Patent RE41571 (original patent and reissue document).
  2. [2] Patent landscape and legal status reports from [Patent Office Database].
  3. [3] Prior art references such as U.S. Patent No. 4,816,456.
  4. [4] Industry patent filings related to immunomodulators and cytokines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE41571

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.