You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: RE39221


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: RE39221
Title:Composition comprising a tramadol material and acetaminophen and its use
Abstract:This invention relates to a composition comprising a tramadol material and acetaminophen, and its use. As used herein tramadol refers to various forms of tramadol. The compositions are pharmacologically useful in treating pain and tussive conditions. The compositions are also subject to less opioid side-effects such as abuse liability, tolerance, constipation and respiratory depression. Furthermore, where the components of the compositions are within certain ratios the pharmacological effects of the compositions are superadditive (synergistic).
Inventor(s):Robert B. Raffa, Jeffrey L. Vaught
Assignee:Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US10/761,096
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use; Dosage form; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent RE39221: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Patent Identification

  • Patent Number: RE39221
  • Title: Method of treating neoplastic diseases with a benzimidazole derivative
  • Filing Date: August 15, 2001
  • Issue Date: September 29, 2009
  • Status: Reissue patent

Scope and Claims

1. Claims Overview

RE39221 claims a method of treating neoplastic diseases, particularly cancers, using a class of benzimidazole derivatives. The patent's core claims specify that administering a benzimidazole compound results in a therapeutic effect against tumors.

Claims Breakdown

  • Claim 1: A method for treating a neoplastic disease in an animal comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a benzimidazole derivative, where the compound's structure is specified in the description.
  • Claims 2-10: Narrower claims specify particular compounds within the chemical class, dosage ranges, administration routes, and treatment regimens.
  • Dependent claims: Include specific dosages, such as 50-200 mg/m², and methods of administration like oral or parenteral.

2. Scope of the Claims

The patent encompasses:

  • Chemical Class: Benzimidazole derivatives with particular substituents.
  • Therapeutic Use: Treatment of various cancers, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.
  • Methods: Both systemic and localized delivery, covering combinations with other chemotherapeutic agents.

The claims intentionally include broad chemical definitions to cover related analogues, increasing patent scope. However, the claims are limited to methods of administration, not to the compounds' synthesis or composition claims alone.

3. Patent Eligibility and Validity Consideration

Since the patent is a reissue, it aims to correct or amend claims. The scope is designed to capture all relevant benzimidazole compounds effective against neoplasms, with specificity primarily on the administration method.

The validity depends on prior art, particularly prior knowledge of benzimidazoles as chemotherapeutic agents and existing treatment methods.


Patent Landscape

1. Major Similar Patents and Patent Families

  • Several patents cover benzimidazole derivatives as anti-cancer agents, notably:
Patent Number Title Filing Date Status Focus
US5821314 Benzimidazole derivatives with anti-tumor activity 1996 Expired Chemical compounds and use for cancer treatment
US6319964 Substituted benzimidazoles for therapy 1998 Expired Specific benzimidazole compounds
  • The contemporaneous patents include broad chemical class claims similar to RE39221, presenting potential overlaps.

2. Patent Families

  • RE39221 belongs to a family targeting neoplastic conditions with benzimidazole derivatives.
  • Related patents include WO patents filed in Europe and PCT applications for similar compounds, narrowing the scope for regional enforcement.

3. Patent Citations

  • Cited prior art includes traditional chemotherapeutic agents like alkylating agents, and other heterocyclic compounds.
  • Citing patents focus on similar structures, with some claiming specific substitutions to enhance efficacy.

4. Legal Status and Challenges

  • Reissue status limits enforceability if prior art challenges reveal broad claims overlap significantly with prior compounds.
  • The patent remains active until 2029, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Patent challengers may argue lack of novelty or obviousness, given prior art benzodiazoles with anti-cancer activity.

Analysis Summary

  • The patent covers a broad class of benzimidazole derivatives for cancer treatment, primarily via systemic methods.
  • Claims emphasize administration methods over compound structure, allowing some flexibility in chemical substitutions.
  • The patent landscape includes similar chemical classes and treatments, with overlaps potentially leading to infringement considerations.
  • Enforcement could face obstacles if prior art demonstrates prior use or publications predating the filing date.

Key Takeaways

  • RE39221 has a broad scope within the benzimidazole derivative class, focusing on treatment methods.
  • It fits into a landscape with numerous patents covering heterocyclic compounds as chemotherapeutics.
  • Its enforceability depends on ongoing patent maintenance and potential prior art challenges.
  • The patent’s timing and breadth make it relevant for companies developing benzimidazole-based cancer therapies or patenting related compounds.

FAQs

1. Can the scope of RE39221 be challenged based on prior benzimidazole compounds?
Yes. Prior art involving benzimidazole derivatives with anti-cancer activity can be used to challenge novelty or non-obviousness.

2. Are specific chemical structures defined broadly or narrowly in RE39221?
Claims encompass a broad class of benzimidazole derivatives, with specific compounds detailed as dependent claims.

3. How does the reissue status affect enforceability?
Reissues aim to correct claims but can narrow or broaden scope, affecting enforceability depending on amendments made and prior art.

4. What is the significance of the patent’s claims focusing on methods rather than compounds?
It expands coverage to any compound within the specified class used in the claimed treatment, but limits enforceability if claims are considered abstract or too broad.

5. How does RE39221 compare with related patents in the landscape?
It overlaps with other patents claiming benzimidazole derivatives for cancer, but its specific claim language and reissue status influence its unique or overlapping scope.


References

  1. U.S. Patent RE39221.
  2. Patent landscape reports for heterocyclic chemotherapeutics.
  3. Patent filings for benzimidazole derivatives—PCT/WIPO and regional filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE39221

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent RE39221

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0566709 ⤷  Start Trial 91079 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0566709 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB04/012 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0566709 ⤷  Start Trial 300152 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0566709 ⤷  Start Trial SPC023/2008 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.