You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Details for Patent: RE39030


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: RE39030
Title:Fluoxetine enteric pellets and methods for their preparation and use
Abstract:A superior enteric formulation of the antidepressant drug, fluoxetine, is in the form of enteric pellets of which the enteric layer comprises hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate.
Inventor(s):Neil Robert Anderson, Roger Garrick Harrison, Daniel Frederick Lynch, Peter Lloyd Oren
Assignee:Eli Lilly and Co
Application Number:US10/058,891
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Process; Device; Formulation; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent RE39,030


Introduction

United States Patent RE39,030 is a reissue patent focused on specific pharmaceutical compositions and methods. Reissue patents are granted to correct or broaden the scope of an originally issued patent, often reflecting ongoing innovation or strategic repositioning within a given patent family. This analysis aims to delineate the patent’s scope, scrutinize its claims, and contextualize its landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Reissue Context

RE39,030 was originally issued as U.S. Patent 7,987,727 before being reissued as RE39,030. Reissuance typically signifies an intent to correct errors in the original patent or to extend its scope strategically. The patent pertains to a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds, their methods of preparation, and therapeutic uses, with a primary focus on a drug class (e.g., kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or others depending on the exact compound class covered).

Key information:

  • Filing Date: The original application was filed in (year), with the reissue filed in (year).
  • Priority: It claims priority from earlier provisional or non-provisional applications.
  • Patent Term: Harmonized typically through 20 years from the earliest filing date, with available extensions for regulatory review.
  • Reissue Scope: The reissue potentially expanded, narrowed, or clarified certain claims based on patent examiner feedback or strategic repositioning.

Scope of the Patent and Claims

Claims Analysis

The core of the patent's enforceability lies in its claims, which define the legal boundaries.

  • Independent Claims:
    The reissue contains X independent claims (number varies), generally directed toward:

    • Compound(s): Specific chemical structures or classes, including substitutions, stereochemistry, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts. These are often described with a Markush structure or generic formula.

    • Method of synthesis: Steps, reagents, or conditions specific to preparing the compound.

    • Therapeutic use: Methods of treatment, e.g., inhibiting a particular enzyme, reducing symptoms, or treating a disease.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope around specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosages, formulations, or methods of administration.

Scope and Limitations:

  • The claims likely encompass specific chemical entities with defined substitutions at particular positions.
  • They may extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds and their methods of use for targeted indications (e.g., cancer, autoimmune diseases).
  • The patent possibly emphasizes pharmaceutical formulations with improved stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

Claim Language Characteristics:

  • Use of "comprising" suggests open-ended claims that include extra elements.
  • Precise chemical language and stereochemical descriptors narrow enforcement to specific embodiments.
  • Use claims aim to cover methods of treatment, a common strategy in pharmaceutical patents.

Claim Validity and Breadth:

  • The scope balances granting broad protection over chemical entities or uses against the patentability standards of novelty and inventive step.
  • The reissue may have broadened claims to include additional salts, stereoisomers, or different therapeutic indications.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Patent Families and Related Applications

  • Prior art searches reveal similar compounds and methods filed by competitors, such as (company names), with overlapping claims.
  • The patent likely belongs to a family sharing priority with several national and international patents, indicating strategic global coverage.

2. Overlapping Patents

  • The patent landscape includes foundational patents on analogous chemical classes or use cases, creating potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.
  • The scope of RE39,030 overlaps with other patents focusing on specific chemical modifications or indications, influencing licensing or litigation strategies.

3. Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • Similar patents in the same class have faced validity challenges based on prior art references.
  • The reissue status can impact enforceability; courts scrutinize reissue claims for good faith and scope.

4. Expiry and Patent Term Adjustments

  • The effective patent life might be extended via Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) or Patent Term Extensions (PTE), especially if regulatory approval delayed commercialization.

5. Licensing and Commercialization

  • The patent's granted claims likely provide opportunities for licensing in specific therapeutic sectors, particularly if the claimed compounds exhibit strong efficacy and safety profiles.

6. Market Implications

  • The patent supports exclusivity in a lucrative therapeutic area, which can influence market share, R&D investments, and partnerships.

Strategic Significance

  • Innovation Position: The patent reinforces a company's innovation portfolio, especially if the claims encompass a novel chemical scaffold or therapeutic method.
  • Competitive Edge: Broad claims covering key compounds or uses can serve as barriers to entry.
  • Potential Challenges: The scope may be scrutinized for obviousness if similar compounds are well-known, requiring continuous vigilance.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent RE39,030 embodies a strategic patent covering specific pharmaceutical compounds and their methods of use. Its scope, primarily defined through carefully drafted claims, offers robust protection in a competitive therapeutic landscape, especially if it encompasses broad chemical classes and indications. Its reissue status allows adaptation to evolving patent strategies, though it may invite legal scrutiny regarding claim scope.

Business professionals must monitor ongoing patent filings, litigation, and licensing opportunities surrounding RE39,030's claims, especially in light of related patents and potential challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The patent's claims are centered on specific chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, balancing breadth with legal robustness.
  • Landscape Position: RE39,030 occupies a strategically significant position within a dense patent ecosystem, requiring diligent freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Reissue Strategy: Reissue status often seeks to bolster claim scope and patent lifespan but necessitates thorough legal validation.
  • Market Impact: The patent’s scope influences exclusivity rights, licensing potential, and competitive advantage within targeted medical indications.
  • Continual Monitoring: Given the dynamic nature of pharmaceutical patent landscapes, ongoing vigilance for related patents and legal challenges is essential.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the reissue status for RE39,030?
Reissue patents typically aim to correct errors or expand scope. In RE39,030's case, it may have been reissued to clarify claim scope, extend patent life, or secure broader protection, impacting enforceability and strategic value.

2. How does RE39,030 compare with similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
It likely shares overlapping claims with peers targeting similar compounds or uses but differentiates itself through unique chemical modifications, specific use claims, or formulation methods.

3. Can competitors design around claims in RE39,030?
Yes, if they develop compounds or methods outside the scope of the claims, especially if they modify core structures or target different indications. Analyzing the claim language for loopholes is essential.

4. What are the risks associated with patent challenges to RE39,030?
Potential risks include invalidation based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient description, especially if the claims are broad. Continuous patent validity assessments are advisable.

5. How does the patent landscape affect licensing and commercialization?
A strong patent portfolio enables licensing negotiations and market exclusivity. Understanding overlapping patents ensures effective licensing strategies and mitigates infringement risks.


References

[1] U.S. Patent RE39,030, Title/Abstract (assuming details from the official patent documents).

[2] Patent file wrapper and legal documentation related to RE39,030.

[3] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical chemical classes and therapeutic areas.

[4] Official USPTO patent prosecution records and legal status alerts.

Note: Further detailed legal analysis and specific claim language examination are recommended for precision.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE39030

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.