Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,849,085


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,849,085
Title:Sustained release drug delivery devices, methods of use, and methods of manufacturing thereof
Abstract:A method and device for treating a mammalian organism to obtain a desired local or systemic physiological or pharmacological effect is provided. The method includes administering a sustained release drug delivery system to a mammalian organism in need of such treatment at an area wherein release of an effective agent is desired and allowing the effective agent to pass through the device in a controlled manner. The device includes an inner core or reservoir including the effective agent, an impermeable tube which encloses portions of the reservoir, and a permeable member at an end of the tube.
Inventor(s):Hong Guo, Paul Ashton
Assignee: Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US14/919,962
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Drug Patent 9,849,085: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

This analysis details United States Patent 9,849,085, covering its patent claims, scope, and the broader competitive landscape. The patent, granted on January 16, 2018, to Amgen Inc., pertains to processes for producing recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO).

What Are the Core Claims of Patent 9,849,085?

Patent 9,849,085 has seven independent claims and several dependent claims. The core of the patent lies in a specific process for producing rhEPO.

Claim 1: A Process for Producing rhEPO

The foundational claim, Claim 1, defines a method for producing a recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) mutein with specific glycoform characteristics. The process involves:

  • Culturing host cells: Utilizing a mammalian host cell line, specifically a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell line.
  • Introducing an expression vector: The host cells are modified to express a DNA sequence encoding the rhEPO mutein.
  • Controlling culture conditions: Specific conditions are maintained during cell culture to influence the glycostructure of the secreted rhEPO. Key parameters include:
    • Sialic acid content: The process aims to achieve a target sialic acid content in the secreted rhEPO.
    • Branching of N-linked glycans: Control over the structure of N-linked glycans, specifically the degree of branching.
    • Fucosylation: Management of fucose content on N-linked glycans.
  • Purification: Downstream processing steps to isolate and purify the rhEPO.

The claims specify parameters for controlling the cellular machinery responsible for glycan synthesis, including the expression levels of specific enzymes involved in glycan elongation and termination.

Claims 2-7: Specific Process Variations and Improvements

Claims 2 through 7 delineate specific enhancements and variations of the core process described in Claim 1. These include:

  • Claim 2: Focuses on culturing host cells under specific nutrient limitations or additions to modulate glycan structures.
  • Claim 3: Details the manipulation of cell culture media composition, such as glutamine or amino acid levels, to influence glycosylation.
  • Claim 4: Describes the use of specific culture durations and feeding strategies to optimize rhEPO glycoform profiles.
  • Claim 5: Emphasizes purification steps that preserve the desired glycoform characteristics of the produced rhEPO.
  • Claim 6: Specifies a particular mammalian host cell line, such as CHO-K1 or derivative cell lines, known for their ability to produce complex glycoproteins.
  • Claim 7: Defines a specific range for the sialic acid content of the secreted rhEPO, often expressed in moles of sialic acid per mole of rhEPO.

The claims collectively protect a method for producing rhEPO with a tailored glycostructure, which is critical for its biological activity and therapeutic efficacy.

What Is the Scope of Protection Afforded by Patent 9,849,085?

The scope of Patent 9,849,085 is primarily focused on the process of manufacturing a specific type of rhEPO, rather than the rhEPO molecule itself or its therapeutic uses. This distinction is crucial for understanding its market implications.

Process vs. Product Claims

Unlike patents claiming a specific chemical compound or a method of treating a disease, 9,849,085 protects the how of rhEPO production. This means any entity wishing to practice the specific manufacturing method described in the claims would infringe upon this patent.

Glycoform Specificity

The patent's value lies in its ability to control the glycosylation pattern of rhEPO. Glycosylation significantly impacts a protein's stability, half-life, immunogenicity, and receptor binding. By controlling these aspects during production, Amgen can produce rhEPO with potentially improved or specific therapeutic profiles.

Geographic Scope

As a United States patent, its protection is limited to the territorial boundaries of the United States. Manufacturing, using, selling, or importing the claimed process within the U.S. without a license from Amgen would constitute infringement.

Exclusivity and Market Entry

The patent grants Amgen the exclusive right to practice its claimed manufacturing process for the term of the patent. This exclusivity can act as a significant barrier to entry for competitors seeking to utilize the same production methodology for rhEPO. Competitors would need to:

  • Develop alternative manufacturing processes that do not infringe on Patent 9,849,085.
  • Obtain a license from Amgen.
  • Challenge the validity of the patent.

What Is the Patent Landscape for Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rhEPO)?

The patent landscape surrounding rhEPO is extensive and complex, reflecting its long history and significant therapeutic and commercial importance. Amgen has been a key player in this space for decades, holding numerous patents related to rhEPO, its production, and its formulations.

Amgen's Dominance in rhEPO Patents

Amgen's original patents for epoetin alfa (Epogen) established its early market dominance. While some of these foundational patents have expired, Amgen has continued to innovate and secure patents on improvements and next-generation products. Patent 9,849,085 represents this ongoing effort to protect its manufacturing expertise and intellectual property.

Key Areas of Patenting in the rhEPO Space

The patenting activity in the rhEPO sector generally falls into several categories:

  • Composition of Matter: Patents covering the rhEPO molecule itself, including specific variants or muteins.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Patents like 9,849,085 that protect novel or improved methods of producing rhEPO, focusing on cell lines, culture conditions, and purification techniques to achieve desired product attributes.
  • Formulations and Delivery Systems: Patents for specific drug formulations, stabilizers, or novel drug delivery devices that enhance rhEPO's therapeutic use or patient compliance.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Patents covering new indications or methods of treating diseases using rhEPO.
  • Biosimilar Development: While biosimilar manufacturers do not infringe on composition-of-matter patents for the original drug, they can face challenges related to process patents, formulation patents, and patents on specific manufacturing intermediates or technologies.

Competitors and Biosimilar Landscape

The market for rhEPO has evolved significantly with the advent of biosimilars. Major pharmaceutical companies and specialized biosimilar developers have entered the market with their own versions of rhEPO. These competitors often focus on developing manufacturing processes that circumvent existing patents, particularly process patents.

Companies active in the rhEPO biosimilar space include:

  • Samsung Bioepis
  • Celltrion
  • Hospira (now part of Pfizer)
  • Sandoz (part of Novartis)

These entities invest heavily in R&D to develop alternative production methods that can yield biosimilars with comparable efficacy and safety profiles to the originator product, while also navigating the existing patent thicket.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

The rhEPO patent landscape has been a frequent arena for patent litigation. Amgen has actively defended its intellectual property against biosimilar manufacturers. Challenges to patent validity, non-infringement arguments, and freedom-to-operate analyses are common strategies employed by companies looking to enter the market.

Patent 9,849,085 in the Broader Context

Patent 9,849,085, with its focus on specific rhEPO manufacturing processes, adds another layer to this complex landscape. For companies developing rhEPO products, a thorough understanding of this patent and its claims is essential for:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO) assessments: Determining if their intended manufacturing process infringes on Amgen's patent.
  • Strategic R&D: Developing alternative manufacturing pathways that avoid infringement.
  • Licensing negotiations: Potentially seeking licenses from Amgen if their processes are similar.
  • Litigation strategy: Understanding potential infringement risks and defense options.

The patent's emphasis on controlling glycoform profiles suggests Amgen's continued commitment to optimizing rhEPO for enhanced therapeutic performance, a key differentiator in a crowded market.

Key Takeaways

  • Process-Focused Protection: United States Patent 9,849,085 protects specific methods for manufacturing recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), particularly focusing on controlling glycan structures.
  • Glycosylation Control: The patent's core innovation lies in its ability to modulate key glycostructural attributes of rhEPO, including sialic acid content and glycan branching, during the production process using mammalian host cells.
  • Competitive Barrier: This process patent serves as an intellectual property barrier, restricting competitors from using Amgen's patented manufacturing techniques within the United States.
  • Biosimilar Implications: Companies developing rhEPO biosimilars must conduct rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses to ensure their manufacturing processes do not infringe on Patent 9,849,085, potentially necessitating the development of alternative production methods.
  • Evolving Landscape: The patent is part of a broader, dense patent landscape for rhEPO, characterized by extensive intellectual property held by originator companies like Amgen and ongoing efforts by biosimilar developers to navigate or challenge existing patents.

FAQs

  1. Does Patent 9,849,085 cover the rhEPO molecule itself? No, the patent's claims are directed towards the process of producing rhEPO, not the rhEPO molecule as a composition of matter.

  2. What specific aspect of rhEPO production does the patent aim to control? The patent primarily focuses on controlling the glycosylation patterns of the secreted rhEPO, influencing attributes like sialic acid content and glycan branching.

  3. What type of host cells are utilized in the patented process? The patented process involves culturing mammalian host cells, specifically mentioning Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines.

  4. Does this patent extend protection outside the United States? No, as a United States patent, its legal protection is limited to the territory of the United States.

  5. How might a biosimilar manufacturer circumvent Patent 9,849,085? Biosimilar manufacturers can seek to circumvent the patent by developing and employing alternative manufacturing processes that do not fall within the scope of the patent's claims, or by challenging the patent's validity.

Cited Sources

[1] Amgen Inc. (2018). Process for producing recombinant human erythropoietin mutein (U.S. Patent No. 9,849,085). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,849,085

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,849,085

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2233112 ⤷  Start Trial 122014000063 Germany ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2233112 ⤷  Start Trial 132014902285293 Italy ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 028372 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.