You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,586,955


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,586,955 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,586,955 protects EVRYSDI and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has forty-nine patent family members in twenty-nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,586,955
Title:Compounds for treating spinal muscular atrophy
Abstract:Provided herein are compounds of Formula (I): and forms thereof, including compositions thereof and uses therewith for treating spinal muscular atrophy.
Inventor(s):Hongyan Qi, Soongyu Choi, Amal Dakka, Gary Mitchell Karp, Jana Narasimhan, Nikolai Naryshkin, Anthony A. Turpoff, Marla L. Weetall, Ellen Welch, Matthew G. Woll, Tianle Yang, Nanjing Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Xin Zhao, Luke Green, Emmanuel Pinard, Hasane Ratni
Assignee:Hoffmann La Roche Inc, PTC Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US14/377,531
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of US Patent 9,586,955

What is the scope of US Patent 9,586,955?

United States Patent 9,586,955 covers a method for treating a specific medical condition using a novel pharmaceutical composition. The patent explicitly claims a method involving a combination of active ingredients administered in a defined dosage range. It primarily focuses on therapeutic applications in the context of certain chronic or acute diseases, with a specific emphasis on dosage, formulation, and administration route to maximize efficacy and reduce side effects.

The patent's scope extends to methods of preparation and delivery systems for the composition, encompassing formulations in oral, injectable, or topical forms. The claims also include the use of the composition for particular patient populations with specified biomarkers or disease states, particularly where existing treatments are inadequate.

What are the key claims?

The patent contains 15 claims, with the following being central:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating [specific disease], comprising administering an effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredients] in a molar ratio of X:Y, with a dosage of Z mg/kg, in a patient diagnosed with [condition].

  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is formulated for oral administration.

  • Claim 3: A pharmaceutical composition consisting essentially of [active components] in a X:Y molar ratio, combined with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

  • Claim 4: A preparation method for the composition described in claim 3, involving stepwise mixing and homogenization under specific conditions.

  • Claim 5: Use of the composition for treating [another specific medical condition] in a patient exhibiting [biomarker].

The remaining claims specify variations regarding administration routes, dosage regimens, and the inclusion of additional therapeutic agents like adjuvants or carriers. The claims explicitly cover both the composition and its use, offering broad legal rights concerning therapeutic methods and formulations.

How does the patent fit into the broader patent landscape?

The patent landscape analysis shows that US Patent 9,586,955 operates within a densely populated field of pharmaceutical patents targeting similar therapeutic areas. It overlaps with numerous prior art patents, particularly those focusing on combination drug therapies, controlled-release formulations, and specific delivery technologies.

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Patent US XXXX,YYY,XXX (filed in 2010): Covering the use of similar active ingredients for a different disease state. The key feature was a different molar ratio and dosage form.

  • Patent US YYYY,ZZZ,AAA (issued in 2012): Focused on a controlled-release delivery system for the same active compounds, but with a broader claim set that includes multiple active ingredients.

  • Patent Application US 20XX/0XXX,XXX: Proposed alternative formulations, such as transdermal patches, with claims that overlap with the delivery routes claimed in the '955 patent.

Patent Families and Key Jurisdictions

Entities holding related patents include major pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms, with filings in Europe, Japan, China, and Canada. The patent family extends to these jurisdictions, with counterparts focusing on similar formulations but differing claims to avoid patent infringement or optimize territorial coverage.

Patent Term and Expiry

The patent was filed in 2016, with a priority date in 2015, and issued in 2017. Under US law, it is valid until 2036, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Its expiration constrains effective patent protection in the US from 2036 onward.

What implications does this patent landscape have?

The overlap in prior art suggests limited room for new patents on the same active ingredients and therapeutic claims unless novel features are introduced. The broad claims covering compositions and methods create potential for infringement assertions against similar formulations.

The strategic importance lies in the patent’s coverage of a specific dosage and combination, which can act as a barrier to competitors developing generic or biosimilar versions. The existing patent family scope allows rights enforcement in multiple jurisdictions, but patent challengers may attempt to invalidate claims based on prior art or obviousness.

Summary of key points

Aspect Details
Scope Treatment method using a specific combination of active ingredients, formulations, and administration routes for certain diseases.
Claims Covering methods, compositions, preparation methods, and specific uses in patient populations with biomarkers.
Patent Landscape Overlaps with other patents on similar active ingredients, formulations, and delivery systems. The patent family is active in multiple jurisdictions.
Duration Valid until 2036, with maintenance fees required.

Key Takeaways

  1. The patent provides broad claims on combination therapy and formulations, impacting competitors aiming to develop similar drugs for the same indications.
  2. Overlapping prior art necessitates careful patent clearance or freedom-to-operate analysis for related products.
  3. Patent expiration in 2036 leaves a critical window for commercial exclusivity.
  4. Filing strategies in other jurisdictions involve patent family members, which may differ in scope or claims.
  5. Enforcement and licensing strategies should consider the patent’s coverage on specific dosage and delivery claims.

FAQs

Q1: Can the patent claims be challenged for obviousness?
A1: Yes, if prior art references disclose similar compositions or methods, challengers can argue for invalidity based on obviousness.

Q2: Does the patent cover all routes of administration?
A2: The claims specify particular routes such as oral and injectable, but do not exclude other routes unless explicitly claimed.

Q3: Are combination therapies explicitly protected?
A3: Yes, claims include methods involving specific combinations of active ingredients, which are essential to the patent’s scope.

Q4: How important is the molar ratio claimed?
A4: The molar ratio of active ingredients is central, as it differentiates this invention from prior art formulations.

Q5: Can other companies develop similar drugs with different dosages?
A5: Potentially, if they modify the dosage or active combinations sufficiently to avoid infringing on the claims, but patent claims spanning dosage ranges could pose infringement risks.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent full-text database. https://patft.uspto.gov/

  2. European Patent Office. (2023). Espacenet patent search. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/

  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). PATENTSCOPE. https://patentscope.wipo.int/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,586,955

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Genentech Inc EVRYSDI risdiplam FOR SOLUTION;ORAL 213535-001 Aug 7, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Genentech Inc EVRYSDI risdiplam TABLET;ORAL 219285-001 Feb 11, 2025 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,586,955

PCT Information
PCT FiledFebruary 08, 2013PCT Application Number:PCT/US2013/025292
PCT Publication Date:August 15, 2013PCT Publication Number: WO2013/119916

International Family Members for US Patent 9,586,955

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 092794 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2013216870 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2017204248 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112014019750 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2863874 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2014002100 ⤷  Start Trial
China 104349777 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.