Details for Patent: 9,320,712
Which drugs does patent 9,320,712 protect, and when does it expire?
Patent 9,320,712 protects PRECEDEX and is included in one NDA.
Protection for PRECEDEX has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.
This patent has fifty-three patent family members in thirty-six countries.
Summary for Patent: 9,320,712
| Title: | Dexmedetomidine premix formulation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | The presently disclosed subject matter relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising dexmedetomidine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof wherein the composition is formulated as a liquid for parenteral administration to a subject, and wherein the composition is disposed within a sealed container as a premixture. The pharmaceutical compositions can be used, for example, in perioperative care of a patient or for sedation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Priyanka Roychowdhury, Robert A. Cedergren | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Hospira Inc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US14/177,008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: | See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,320,712 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Composition; Dosage form; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 9,320,712: Dexmedetomidine Ready-to-Use Injection Claims and Patent LandscapeUS Patent 9,320,712 protects a ready-to-use parenteral dexmedetomidine hydrochloride solution in a sealed glass container. The independent claim covers a broad concentration range of approximately 0.005 to 50 micrograms per milliliter. The dependent claims narrow the formulation to clinically relevant concentrations, particularly 4 micrograms per milliliter, with optional sodium chloride and specified container volumes. The patent is directed to a finished injectable product, not dexmedetomidine as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. Its commercial significance is greatest for premixed dexmedetomidine injection products, especially 4 mcg/mL products supplied in 20 mL, 50 mL, or 100 mL sealed glass containers. What does US Patent 9,320,712 protect?The patent protects a composition that satisfies all of the following claim 1 elements:
The claim does not require sodium chloride, a particular pH, a particular volume, or a specific administration route such as intravenous infusion. Those limitations appear only in dependent claims or in the broader specification. The use of “about” expands the practical boundaries of the concentration limitations. The scope would depend on ordinary pharmaceutical measurement tolerances, claim construction, prosecution history, and the accused product’s actual labeled and measured concentration. What is the independent claim scope?Claim 1 is composition-based. It does not require:
The claim can therefore reach a broad range of premixed dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injections if the product is supplied as a liquid in a sealed glass container and falls within the claimed concentration range. A product in a plastic bag may avoid literal infringement of the “sealed glass container” limitation, although the result would depend on the product configuration, packaging components, labeling, and possible doctrine-of-equivalents arguments. How do claims 2 through 8 narrow the patent?Claims 2 through 8 create progressively narrower commercial embodiments.
Claim 5 is the most commercially focused concentration claim. Claim 7 is important for a formulation containing approximately 0.9% sodium chloride. Claim 8 is important because a product can meet the concentration limitations but fall outside claim 8 if it is supplied in another volume. Claim 8 is dependent on claim 1, not claim 7. A 100 mL product containing 4 mcg/mL dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and no sodium chloride can still fall within claims 1, 4, 5, and 8 if the remaining limitations are satisfied. What formulations are protected by US 9,320,712?The patent covers ready-to-use liquid formulations containing dexmedetomidine hydrochloride within the claimed concentration ranges. The strongest commercial overlap is with the following formulation profile:
A product containing 400 mcg of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in 100 mL, equivalent to 4 mcg/mL, is within the concentration and volume limitations of claims 5 and 8 if supplied in a sealed glass container. The claims are not limited to sodium chloride formulations. The presence of sodium chloride creates additional dependent-claim exposure, but its absence does not avoid claim 1 or claims 2 through 5. Does the patent cover Precedex?Precedex is dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection. FDA labeling identifies both concentrated and ready-to-use presentations, including a 4 mcg/mL ready-to-use injection presentation.[1] A Precedex-type product supplied at approximately 4 mcg/mL in a sealed glass container is the clearest commercial embodiment corresponding to claims 1, 4, 5, and potentially 8. The infringement analysis depends on the actual approved product configuration. A concentration match alone is not sufficient. The container must also satisfy the sealed-glass limitation for literal infringement. When does US Patent 9,320,712 expire?The patent has a listed statutory expiration date of approximately May 30, 2033, based on its earliest effective nonprovisional priority date and the 20-year patent-term framework.[2][3]
The effective blocking period can be shorter than the nominal expiration date if the patent is disclaimed, invalidated, narrowed in litigation, or removed from the FDA Orange Book. Conversely, patent-term adjustment can affect the final enforceable expiration date. The USPTO term information controls the legal expiration calculation.[2] What is the Orange Book status of US 9,320,712?US Patent 9,320,712 has been associated with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection products in the FDA patent-listing framework. Orange Book relevance is product-specific. The listing does not create patent rights beyond the issued claims, and an Orange Book listing does not establish that every dexmedetomidine product infringes. For an ANDA applicant, a listed patent can trigger a Paragraph III certification, Paragraph IV certification, or other certification depending on the patent’s expiration, relevance, and the applicant’s product design.[4] The key Orange Book issue is whether the applicant seeks approval for a ready-to-use presentation that matches the listed product and falls within the issued claims. An ANDA directed only to a different container system, such as a non-glass container, may have a stronger noninfringement position against the container limitation. That position would not necessarily eliminate exposure under other dexmedetomidine patents. What Paragraph IV challenges affect this patent?A Paragraph IV challenge would assert that the listed patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. The most likely noninfringement theories for this patent would focus on:
A validity challenge could focus on anticipation, obviousness, written description, enablement, indefiniteness, or claim construction. The likely prior-art field includes earlier dexmedetomidine formulations, concentrated injections, ready-to-use parenteral products, isotonic saline systems, and glass-container packaging. A Paragraph IV certification itself is not proof that an applicant has launched or that the patent is weak. The ANDA applicant’s identity and detailed certification strategy generally are not fully disclosed by the public Orange Book record.[4] Which companies are challenging US 9,320,712?Public FDA patent data generally does not identify every ANDA applicant that has submitted a Paragraph IV certification. A reliable public record must be established through Hatch-Waxman litigation filings, FDA litigation correspondence, or a district-court docket. The principal generic and injectable-drug competitors in the dexmedetomidine market include Fresenius Kabi, Hikma, Sagent Pharmaceuticals, and other ANDA sponsors. Their commercial presence does not, by itself, establish that each company challenged US 9,320,712. What patent litigation affects dexmedetomidine ready-to-use injections?Patent disputes involving dexmedetomidine can arise from several patent families:
US 9,320,712 is most directly relevant to the finished ready-to-use product. It is less directly relevant to a concentrated vial that must be diluted before administration, unless the accused product independently satisfies the ready-to-use limitation. A litigation analysis should distinguish between:
No settlement terms should be inferred from FDA approval or market entry alone. Hatch-Waxman settlements may include launch dates, licenses, authorized-generic arrangements, or restrictions that are not apparent from the patent record. Are there method-of-use patents for dexmedetomidine?Dexmedetomidine has a broader patent landscape than US 9,320,712. Earlier patents addressed the active ingredient, alpha-2 adrenergic agonist use, sedation, anesthesia, intensive-care treatment, and procedural applications. The commercial force of method-of-use patents is narrower than a product claim. A method claim generally requires proof that the accused party practiced or induced the claimed method. A ready-to-use composition claim can create more direct product exposure because the product itself is the claimed subject matter. FDA labeling also matters. If a generic label includes a patented indication, induced-infringement risk can increase. A carve-out or “skinny label” may reduce method-of-use exposure, although it does not necessarily avoid a composition patent covering the product itself.[5] How strong is the patent estate for dexmedetomidine?US 9,320,712 has moderate-to-strong commercial relevance but a fact-dependent enforcement profile. Strengths
Vulnerabilities
The strongest infringement case concerns a premixed 4 mcg/mL dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection supplied in a 100 mL sealed glass container. The weakest case concerns a concentrated product requiring dilution, a plastic-container presentation, or a different active form. How does US 9,320,712 compare with other dexmedetomidine patents?
The patent should be analyzed as one layer of a product-specific estate. A design-around that avoids US 9,320,712 may still implicate another formulation, packaging, or method-of-use patent. What generic launch risks exist for dexmedetomidine?A generic sponsor faces different risks depending on its presentation.
The principal design-around options are container substitution, concentration changes, non-ready-to-use presentation, and different formulation architecture. Each option can affect FDA approval, manufacturing cost, stability, compatibility, and hospital purchasing preferences. What licensing deals and ownership changes affect the patent?Hospira developed and commercialized key dexmedetomidine injection products. Pfizer completed its acquisition of Hospira in 2015, making Pfizer the relevant corporate successor for Hospira’s pharmaceutical assets, subject to any later assignments or licensing arrangements.[6] No license terms should be assumed from the corporate acquisition. A patent assignment transfers ownership; it does not necessarily disclose downstream supply agreements, authorized-generic arrangements, or settlement licenses. For diligence, the relevant ownership chain is:
Key Takeaways
FAQs About US Patent 9,320,712 and DexmedetomidineDoes US 9,320,712 cover dexmedetomidine concentrate vials?Not generally if the vial requires dilution or other preparation before administration. The “ready-to-use liquid” limitation is central to claim 1. A concentrate may still be exposed to separate dexmedetomidine patents. Can a generic avoid the patent by using a plastic IV bag?A plastic-container product may avoid literal infringement of the sealed-glass limitation. The full product configuration and any related patents must still be reviewed. Does 0.9% sodium chloride automatically create infringement?No. It creates potential exposure under claims 6 and 7 only when the other limitations of claim 1 are also satisfied. Is a 50 mL dexmedetomidine product covered by claim 8?Yes, if it is a ready-to-use parenteral dexmedetomidine hydrochloride liquid in a sealed glass container and meets the claim 1 limitations. Claim 8 expressly includes 50 mL. Does FDA approval establish infringement of US 9,320,712?No. FDA approval and patent infringement are separate legal determinations. Approval confirms regulatory authorization, not whether the product falls within the issued claims. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,320,712
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospira | PRECEDEX | dexmedetomidine hydrochloride | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 021038-004 | Nov 14, 2014 | AP | RX | Yes | Yes | 9,320,712*PED | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Hospira | PRECEDEX | dexmedetomidine hydrochloride | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 021038-002 | Mar 13, 2013 | AP | RX | Yes | Yes | 9,320,712*PED | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Hospira | PRECEDEX | dexmedetomidine hydrochloride | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 021038-003 | Mar 13, 2013 | AP | RX | Yes | Yes | 9,320,712*PED | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 9,320,712
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 089673 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Argentina | 117001 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2013201069 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
