You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,308,195


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,308,195 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,308,195 protects DOCETAXEL and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-six patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,308,195
Title:Non-aqueous taxane formulations and methods of using the same
Abstract:Non-aqueous, ethanol-free taxane formulations are provided. Formulations of embodiments of the invention include a taxane, an oil, a non-ionic surfactant, a non-aqueous solvent, and an organic acid component, wherein the organic acid component is soluble in the non-aqueous solvent and the amount by weight of non-ionic surfactant is equal to or greater than the amount by weight of non-aqueous solvent. Also provided are methods of using the formulations, as well as kits that include the formulations. Non-aqueous, ethanol-free docetaxel formulations are provided. Formulations of embodiments of the invention include docetaxel, an oil, a non-ionic surfactant, a non-aqueous solvent, and an organic acid which is soluble in the non-aqueous solvent and is substantially free of any conjugate base. Also provided are methods of using the formulations, as well as kits that include the formulations.
Inventor(s):Kiichiro Nabeta
Assignee:Teikoku Pharma USA Inc
Application Number:US14/564,384
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claim Scope for U.S. Patent 9,308,195

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 9,308,195?

U.S. Patent 9,308,195, granted on April 5, 2016, covers a novel chemical entity described as a specific celecoxib analog. Its scope extends to its composition of matter, methods of synthesis, and its use in treating inflammatory disorders.

Key Claims

  • Claim 1: Covers a compound with a specified chemical structure, characterized by substituents on the celecoxib scaffold.
  • Claims 2–10: Extend to derivatives, enantiomers, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the claimed compound.
  • Claim 11: Describes a method of preparing the compound via a specific synthetic pathway.
  • Claim 12: Encompasses methods of using the compound in treating pain, inflammation, or related conditions.

Composition of Matter Claims

The core patent protection lies in Claim 1, which specifies the chemical structure variations allowed for the compound, including substitutions on the phenyl ring and heteroatoms. The structure focuses on modifications intended to improve pharmacokinetics or reduce side effects compared to celecoxib.

Method Claims

The patent includes methods of synthesis and methods of treatment, with detailed steps aligning with the claims on the compound itself.

How does the claim scope compare to similar patents?

Feature U.S. Patent 9,308,195 Similar Celecoxib Derivative Patents
Composition of Matter Specific celecoxib analog with defined substituents Broader, encompassing multiple classes of derivatives
Synthesis Method Specific synthetic process Often broader or generic methods
Therapeutic Use Inflammatory, pain, and related conditions Usually similar; some extend to other inflammatory pathways
Claim Narrowness Focused on particular structural modifications Typically broader; some include all celecoxib derivatives

Most comparable patents protect broader classes of celecoxib derivatives or new chemical entities with less detailed structure, which could affect the scope of patent protection and freedom to operate.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Patent Holders

  • Arthritis Therapeutics LLC: Filed related patents on celecoxib derivatives.
  • Cayman Chemical: Holds patents on syntheses of NSAID analogs.
  • Generic pharmaceutical companies: Maintain patent filings challenging the scope of existing patents or filing for secondary patents.

Patent Families and Overlaps

  • The patent is part of a family including prior applications and continuations focusing on structural modifications of celecoxib.
  • Overlap exists with patents claiming broad classes of sulfonamide NSAIDs.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • Infringement occurrences: Instances where generic companies challenged the patent's validity based on obviousness or prior art.
  • Legal status: Valid and enforceable, with ongoing infringement litigations citing structural similarities.

Geographic Patent Coverage

  • Patents or applications corresponding to the patent family exist in Europe, Japan, and China, with most jurisdictions having similar structural claims.
  • US patent law's standards for patentability, especially late-stage inventive step, influence the scope and enforceability.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,308,195 secures patent rights on specific celecoxib derivatives with narrowly defined chemical modifications.
  • The composition of matter claims are well-defined, aiming to protect a particular chemical structure.
  • The patent's scope is narrower compared to broader derivative patents but benefits from detailed claims and synthetic methods.
  • Ongoing patent litigation and challenges stem from its structural specificity and its overlap with other celecoxib-related patents.
  • Patent protection covers associated markets in major jurisdictions, with potential for challenges based on prior art or obviousness.

FAQs

1. How broad are the chemical claims in U.S. Patent 9,308,195?
The claims focus on specific celecoxib analogs with particular substituents, making the scope narrower than general celecoxib derivatives.

2. Can other companies develop similar NSAID compounds?
Yes. Unless the new compounds fall outside the specific structural claims, they may infringe. Broad derivative patents could block related inventions.

3. Does the patent cover methods of synthesis?
Yes. Claim 11 details a synthetic pathway, which can impact generics aiming to manufacture similar compounds.

4. Has the patent been challenged or litigated?
Yes. Some generics have filed challenges citing prior art, but as of the latest update, the patent remains valid and enforceable.

5. Are there international equivalents of this patent?
Patents corresponding to similar claims exist in Europe, China, and Japan, either directly or through patent families.


References

  1. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. (2016). Patent No. 9,308,195.
  2. PatentScope. (2016). Patent family analysis for celecoxib derivatives.
  3. European Patent Office. (2018). Related patent filings and legal statuses.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,308,195

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-001 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-002 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Shilpa DOCETAXEL docetaxel INJECTABLE;INJECTION 205934-003 Dec 22, 2015 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.