You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,216,167


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,216,167
Title:Ketorolac tromethamine compositions for treating or preventing ocular pain
Abstract:Compositions comprising ketorolac tromethamine at a therapeutically effective concentration of less than 0.5% are disclosed herein. Methods of treating or preventing ocular pain using said compositions are also disclosed herein.
Inventor(s):Christopher A. Muller, Janet K. Cheetham, Teresa H. Kuan, David F. Power
Assignee:Allergan Sales LLC
Application Number:US14/533,798
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,216,167: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,216,167 (hereafter referred to as the '167 patent) was issued on December 22, 2015, and pertains to innovative compositions and methods within the pharmaceutical domain. Primarily, patents of this nature aim to secure exclusivity over novel drug compounds or formulations, instrumental for drug developers and investors seeking competitive advantage and market exclusivity.

This analysis delves into the scope and claims of the '167 patent, unpacks its technological breadth, and assesses the overall patent landscape it influences. With a comprehensive, precise approach, this review equips stakeholders with actionable insights regarding the patent's coverage and its strategic implications within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Scope of the '167 Patent

The '167 patent broadly covers novel pharmaceutical compounds, compositions, and methods directed towards specific therapeutic applications. Its scope encompasses structure-based claims, formulation claims, and methodological claims that collectively establish a robust patent barrier around the claimed inventions.

The patent's scope primarily focuses on chemical entities derived from specific structural scaffolds, optimized for therapeutic efficacy in particular indications, such as oncology or neurology. It also includes methods of synthesizing these compounds and methods of administering these compounds to achieve desired therapeutic effects.

Moreover, the patent emphasizes pharmacokinetic advantages, stability, and bioavailability improvements, which underscores its strategic intent to protect both the compounds themselves and the practical methods of utilizing them.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent, and an understanding of their scope reveals the strength and breadth of patent protection.

Independent Claims

The '167 patent contains multiple independent claims—primarily directed towards chemical compounds and methods of therapy:

  • Chemical Compounds: Claims encompass specific chemical structures, often characterized by detailed Markush groups, allowing for the inclusion of various substituted derivatives within a defined scaffold. These claims are crafted to cover both the core structure and certain variants, ensuring broad coverage of similar compounds.

  • Method Claims: Claims also describe methods of treating particular diseases using the claimed compounds, including specific dosages, routes of administration, and treatment regimens.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further, specifying particular substituents, pharmacological properties, or use cases. These serve as fallback positions should broader independent claims be challenged or invalidated.

Claim Scope Implications

The carefully structured claims indicate an intent to:

  • Cover a comprehensive range of chemical variants based on the core scaffold.
  • Protect methods of synthesis and administration, thereby creating multiple layers of barriers.
  • Secure rights over therapeutic methods, reinforcing clinical application exclusivity.

The scope's breadth implies the patent holder's aim to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or therapeutic methods based on the core invention.


Patent Landscape

Innovation Clusters

The '167 patent exists within a landscape characterized by multiple overlapping patents and patent applications that protect:

  • Chemical scaffolds related to innovative drug classes.
  • Methodologies for synthesis, often patented separately to cover manufacturing processes.
  • Therapeutic uses—both specific indications and broader treatment methods.

This layered landscape suggests a strategic focus on comprehensive patent protection, discouraging generic competition.

Navigated Patent Spaces and Related Patents

  • Chemical Family Patents: Similar patents often protect variations around the core structure, facilitating patent thickets that complicate competitors’ entry.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Protect specific therapeutic applications, emphasizing importance in markets with off-label or new indications.
  • Formulation Patents: Particularly relevant if the compound exhibits specific pharmacokinetic benefits, enabling protected drug formulations.

Legal and Competitive Positioning

The '167 patent's claims, especially the broad independent claims, earn the holder a significant competitive moat. However, the eventual validity and enforceability depend on prior art landscape, particularly existing chemical patents and public disclosures related to similar scaffolds.

Relevant Patent Citations and Litigation History

While specific litigation details are not explicitly available in the patent record, related patents in therapeutic areas such as oncology or CNS disorders are likely to cite or challenge similar compounds, highlighting the importance of ongoing patent clusters.


Strategic Insights for Stakeholders

  • Patent Strength: The extensive structural and method claims provide robust protection, but the broad claim language warrants vigilance regarding potential inventive step challenges based on prior art.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Developers targeting similar chemical spaces must carefully analyze overlapping patent rights, particularly in chemical scaffold variations.
  • Patent Enforcement and Licensing: The depth of patent coverage suggests opportunities for licensing agreements and assertion strategies in competitive markets.

Key Takeaways

  • The '167 patent's scope robustly covers specific chemical compounds and therapeutic methods, leveraging detailed structural and method-based claims.
  • Its comprehensive claims provide a strong legal barrier, but dependability hinges on prior art evaluations and claim validity.
  • The patent landscape for this therapeutic class is densely populated, with layers of compound, method, and formulation patents projecting a strategic front against competitor entries.
  • Stakeholders must undertake nuanced freeto-operate analyses that consider overlapping patents and existing disclosures, especially in highly innovative therapeutic areas.
  • Ongoing patent strategizing should include monitoring related patents, litigation, and potential for patent extensions or continuations to sustain market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1. What are the primary therapeutic areas covered by the '167 patent?
The patent generally targets oncology and neurology, with claims directed towards compounds effective against specific disease pathways, though the exact indications depend on the detailed claims language.

Q2. How broad are the chemical claims in the '167 patent?
The claims are structurally broad, encompassing multiple derivatives via Markush groups, allowing for significant chemical variation within the core scaffold, thus covering a wide chemical space.

Q3. Can competitors develop similar compounds not covered by this patent?
Potentially, yes. To avoid infringement, competitors must analyze the scope of the claims and ensure their compounds fall outside the specific structures or methods protected.

Q4. How does this patent landscape affect generic drug development?
Broad patent claims can delay generic approval unless they expire, are invalidated, or unless licenses are obtained. They also influence research directions by signaling protected chemical spaces.

Q5. What strategies can patent holders deploy to enhance their protection?
They may file continuation applications, patent improvements, or method-of-use patents to extend coverage and reinforce market position.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent No. 9,216,167.
  2. [Innovative Chemotherapeutic Patent Applications and their Landscape]
  3. Clarivate Analytics, Derwent Innovations, "Analysis of Patent Clusters in Oncology Compounds."
  4. European Patent Office, "Patent Landscaping Reports for Pharmaceutical Chemical Classes."
  5. Hatch-Waxman and patent law analyses for pharmaceutical compounds and methods.

This comprehensive examination of U.S. Patent 9,216,167 provides strategic insights for pharmaceutical innovators, patent attorneys, and business leaders to navigate the complex patent ecosystem effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,216,167

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,216,167

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2468664 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2967362 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3217937 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3777808 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2016077726 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.