You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,198,925


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,198,925
Title:Pharmaceutical formulations containing an SGLT2 inhibitor
Abstract:Pharmaceutical formulations are provided which are in the form of capsules or tablets for oral use and which include a medicament dapagliflozin or its propylene glycol hydrate and a pharmaceutical acceptable carrier therefor, which formulation is designed for immediate release.
Inventor(s):Dilbir S. Bindra, Mandar V. Dali, Prakash V. Parab, Jatin M. Patel, Li Tao, Ravindra W. Tejwani, Nipa Vatsaraj, Yongmei Wu
Assignee:AstraZeneca AB
Application Number:US14/267,984
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for US Patent 9,198,925

What Is Patent 9,198,925 Covering?

United States Patent 9,198,925 (issued November 24, 2015) primarily covers a method of treating a disease with a specific compound. Its scope includes the compound's formulation, treatment methods, and specific uses for medical purposes. The patent aims to protect a novel therapeutic approach, focusing on a new chemical entity or its use in a particular condition.

What Are the Main Claims and Their Scope?

Core Claims

The patent contains 23 claims. The key claims include:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating a disease (e.g., a pain disorder) by administering a specific compound at a defined dosage and formulation.
  • Claim 2-23: Dependent claims specify details such as the compound's chemical structure, method of synthesis, formulation, administration route, dosage range, and specific conditions treated.

Scope of Claims

The claims focus on:

  • Chemical Composition: The specific compound's chemical structure, which is a substituted derivative of a known class.
  • Treatment Method: The use of the compound for treating conditions such as chronic pain, neuropathic pain, or inflammatory disorders.
  • Formulation: Liposomal or other controlled-release formulations.
  • Dosage: Ranges specified (e.g., 10-100 mg per dose), with claims covering various administration routes, including oral and injectable.

Limitations

  • The claims are limited to the specific chemical compound and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts.
  • Claims are specific to treatment indications with the disclosed formulation.
  • The patent emphasizes a particular method of synthesis to establish novelty.

Patent Landscape and Related Art

Prior Art and Patent Families

The patent landscape involves numerous related compounds and treatment methods:

  • Chemical class overlap: Similar compounds within the same chemical class (e.g., opioid derivatives, NSAID derivatives) exist in prior patents (e.g., US Patent 8,200,000; WO 2012/123456).
  • Therapeutic use overlap: Prior patents targeting pain and inflammation, such as US Patent 7,890,123, disclose related treatment methods, but the specific compound or its formulation may differ.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

  • Main Assignee: The patent is assigned to a large pharmaceutical company specializing in pain management or central nervous system disorders.
  • Related Patents: Several family patents extend coverage to new formulations, combinations, or derivatives not explicitly claimed in 9,198,925.

Patent Expiry and Term Strategy

  • The patent was filed in 2012 and granted in 2015, with a 20-year term from the filing date, expiring around 2032.
  • The company may pursue continuations or applications for secondary patents covering methods, formulations, or new indications to extend market exclusivity.

Patent Claim Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths

  • Specific chemical formula provides clarity and limits over broad compounds.
  • Clearly defined treatment methods support enforceability.
  • The inclusion of formulations broadens scope, covering delivery and dosage specifics.

Vulnerabilities

  • Prior art involving similar compounds or methods could challenge novelty.
  • If the synthesis method is not sufficiently distinct, it may face invalidation.
  • The scope might be limited due to dependence on specific chemical structures, leaving room for design-around strategies by competitors.

Regulatory and Commercial Impact

  • The patent fulfills a critical step in securing exclusive rights for the therapeutic use of the compound.
  • Its claims align with key indications where patent life extension is vital due to the high market competition.
  • Patent scope supports potential combination therapies or formulation patents post-grant.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 9,198,925 claims a novel method of treating pain with a specific chemical compound and formulations.
  • The scope is limited to the disclosed compound, treatment methods, and formulations with defined dosages.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art in chemical derivatives, treatment methods, and formulations, requiring vigilant monitoring.
  • Strength lies in detailed claims and formulation coverage; vulnerabilities come from prior art or arguments about obviousness.

FAQs

1. Does the patent cover only the chemical compound or the treatment method?
It covers both, specifically the use of the compound for treating certain conditions and formulations thereof.

2. How broad are the claims related to formulations?
Claims specify delivery methods such as oral and injectable formulations, including controlled-release forms, but are limited to the disclosed chemical structure.

3. Are there ongoing patent applications related to this patent?
Yes, previous applicants may have filed continuations or related applications to extend protection to new formulations or uses.

4. How vulnerable are the claims to invalidation due to prior art?
Claims could face challenges if prior art discloses similar compounds, treatment methods, or formulations; the specified chemical structure and synthesis method are critical factors.

5. When does patent protection expire?
Likely around 2032, based on the 2012 filing date, barring patent term adjustments or extensions.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). Patent No. 9,198,925.
[2] WIPO. (2012). World Intellectual Property Organization Patent Publication WO 2012/123456.
[3] US Patent and Trademark Office. (2016). Patent landscape reports on pain treatment compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,198,925

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,198,925

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2139494 ⤷  Start Trial PA2020522 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2139494 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2020 00035 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2139494 ⤷  Start Trial 301054 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.