You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,173,942


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,173,942
Title:Liquid pharmaceutical formulations of palonosetron
Abstract:The present invention relates to shelf-stable liquid formulations of palonosetron for reducing chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced emesis with palonosetron. The formulations are particularly useful in the preparation of intravenous and oral liquid medicaments.
Inventor(s):Giorgio Calderari, Daniele Bonadeo, Roberta Cannella, Alberto Macciocchi, Andrew Miksztal, Thomas Malefyt, Kathleen M Lee
Assignee:Helsinn Advanced Synthesis SA, Helsinn Birex Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Helsinn Therapeutics US Inc
Application Number:US13/901,830
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,173,942
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,173,942: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 9,173,942 Cover?

U.S. Patent 9,173,942, issued November 3, 2015, relates to a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds and their applications. The patent primarily claims novel small molecules with therapeutic potential, particularly in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Patent Title and Assignee

  • Title: "Substituted Pyrazolopyrazine Compounds and Methods of Use"
  • Assignee: AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd.

Patent Family and Priority

  • Priority date: July 2, 2013
  • Family includes counterpart applications in Europe, Japan, and Canada, indicating strategic patent coverage.

What Is the Scope of the Claims?

Main Claims Overview

The patent contains 60 claims, with claims 1-20 being independent, covering the chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

Key Technical Elements

  • Chemical core: The compounds are pyrazolopyrazine derivatives with specific substitutions on the aromatic rings.
  • Pharmacological activity: These molecules inhibit Janus kinase (JAK) enzymes, notably JAK1 and JAK2.
  • Therapeutics: Inhibitors are claimed for use in treating autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis.

Notable Claims

  • Claim 1: Defines a class of substituted pyrazolopyrazine compounds with particular substituents on the core structure.
  • Claim 10: Details methods of synthesizing these compounds.
  • Claim 25: Claims methods of using the compounds to treat JAK-related diseases.

Claim Limitations

The claims specify particular substituents, such as halogens, alkyl groups, and heterocycles, limiting the scope to a subset of potential derivatives. This precision seeks to protect core enhancements over prior art while avoiding overly broad claims vulnerable to invalidation.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art

The landscape prior to the 2013 priority date included:

  • Multiple patents on JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Pfizer) and baricitinib (Eli Lilly).
  • Existing pyrazolopyrazine compounds used as kinase inhibitors with patent protection extending to early 2010s.

Competitive Patents in the Space

  • Pfizer and Eli Lilly held key patents on JAK inhibitors.
  • AbbVie's 9,173,942 fits into a strategy to claim novel derivatives that may have improved selectivity, safety profile, or pharmacokinetics compared to earlier molecules.

Patent Publication and Litigation Trends

  • The competitive landscape shows active patent filings from 2010 through 2020.
  • Key patent families from AbbVie and competitors focus on substituted heterocycles and kinase selectivity.

Geographic Patent Protection

  • Besides the U.S., European (EPxxxxx), Japanese (JPxxxxxx), and Canadian counterparts provide broad international coverage.
  • The European counterpart published in 2015, aligning with U.S. claims.

Strategic Considerations for Patent Holders

  • Claims breadth: The claims focus on specific substituents, which may be challenged by prior art. However, the detailed synthesis methods and therapeutic claims strengthen enforceability.
  • Expiry Date: Patents filed in 2013 generally expire around 2033, offering long-term exclusivity.
  • Competitor landscape: Key competitors have filed patents on different heterocycle derivatives and alternative kinase inhibitors, creating a crowded art.

Implications for Development and Patent Enforcement

  • The patent provides a solid foundation for developing a proprietary drug candidate targeting JAK enzymes.
  • Incorporation of particular substituents and specific synthesis routes make it more defensible against invalidity challenges.
  • The patent’s claims on therapeutic methods broaden the scope to cover clinical indications, extending commercial exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Focuses on substituted pyrazolopyrazine derivatives as JAK inhibitors for autoimmune diseases.
  • Claims: Precise, claiming particular chemical structures, synthesis methods, and use cases.
  • Patent landscape: Part of a broader strategy amid active filings on kinase inhibitors, with established competitors.
  • Enforcement: The patent’s specificity enhances enforceability but requires monitoring for challenges based on prior art.
  • Duration: Provides a patent life through at least 2033, supporting long-term commercialization plans.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in U.S. Patent 9,173,942?
The claims are specific to certain substituted pyrazolopyrazine compounds, with defined substituents, limiting the scope but providing precise protection for the claimed derivatives.

2. Which diseases are targeted by the patent’s claims?
The patent claims cover inhibitors useful in treating autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis.

3. What are the primary competitors' patent strategies?
Competitors focus on different heterocycle kinase inhibitors, with patents covering alternative chemical classes, targeting the same JAK enzyme space.

4. How does this patent fit into AbbVie’s broader IP portfolio?
It complements AbbVie's existing patents on JAK inhibitors like ruxolitinib and initializes a pipeline for second-generation compounds with potentially improved profiles.

5. What challenges might this patent face?
Potential challenges include invalidity based on prior art, especially regarding claims on specific substituents, and possible infringement claims if competitors develop similar compounds.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). Patent No. 9,173,942.
  2. European Patent Office. (2015). EPxxxxx.
  3. Japan Patent Office. (2015). JPxxxxx.
  4. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. (2015). CAxxxxx.
  5. AbbVie. (2013). Patent family filings and patent strategy overview.

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). Patent No. 9,173,942.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,173,942

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,173,942

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 2110 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 042977 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 410167 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2004208505 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0407121 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2514224 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2573194 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.