Details for Patent: 9,023,389
Which drugs does patent 9,023,389 protect, and when does it expire?
Patent 9,023,389 protects JORNAY PM and is included in one NDA.
This patent has forty-six patent family members in sixteen countries.
Summary for Patent: 9,023,389
| Title: | Compositions for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Therapeutic compositions and methods for treatment of attention deficit disorder (ADD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) include dosage forms that deliver a therapeutic amount of active drug in a delayed and controlled release formulation. The dosage form can be administered at night and drug release is delayed for from 4 to 6 hours or longer, followed by an ascending release rate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | David Lickrish, Feng Zhang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Ironshore Pharmaceuticals and Development Inc Cayman Island , Formulation Technologies LLC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US14/589,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 9,023,389: Methylphenidate Delayed-and-Sustained Release Patent Scope, Expiration, and Competitive LandscapeUS Patent 9,023,389 protects a multiparticulate methylphenidate formulation designed for evening administration, an approximately eight-hour drug-release delay, and a subsequent 10-to-12-hour sustained-release period. The patent covers the layered bead architecture, specified dissolution profile, excipient combinations, abuse-deterrent features, capsule dosage forms, and human pharmacokinetic parameters. It is a core patent associated with JORNAY PM, the delayed- and extended-release methylphenidate product marketed by Ironshore Pharmaceuticals. The patent is materially stronger than a formulation patent limited to one polymer or excipient because independent claim 1 combines structural limitations with a highly specific dissolution profile. A competing product would need to avoid the layered composition, the claimed release sequence, or both. What drug does US Patent 9,023,389 protect?US 9,023,389 protects oral solid compositions containing methylphenidate or a pharmaceutical salt, principally methylphenidate hydrochloride. The disclosed dosage form uses multiparticulate beads with:
The intended pharmacologic profile is a prolonged initial lag period followed by sustained methylphenidate delivery. This design supports bedtime dosing while delaying exposure until the following morning. The patent does not claim methylphenidate as a chemical compound. It claims a delivery system for methylphenidate. Patent identification
The patent’s expiration is generally listed as August 20, 2027. Any pediatric-exclusivity period must be assessed separately from the ordinary patent term and the current FDA Orange Book entry. The FDA-approved product label identifies US 9,023,389 among the patents associated with JORNAY PM.[1] What does independent claim 1 cover?Claim 1 is the principal composition claim. It requires all of the following:
The test protocol is central. It requires:
A product that has the same general bead design but releases materially more than 10% of methylphenidate before the eight-hour point may avoid literal infringement of claim 1. Conversely, a product with different polymers may still fall within the claim if it satisfies the structural and release limitations. The claim uses “comprising,” which generally leaves the composition open to additional ingredients. An accused product therefore cannot avoid the claim merely by adding another excipient, coating component, colorant, or abuse-deterrent agent. How does claim 2 narrow the patent scope?Claim 2 imposes a more detailed release profile:
Claim 2 also requires that the release rate from approximately 8 to 12 hours be lower than the release rate from approximately 12 to 16 hours. This creates a two-stage post-lag profile. The product must first release methylphenidate relatively slowly and then release it at a faster rate. The claim is narrower than claim 1 because it adds numerical release windows and a comparative release-rate limitation. For a generic applicant, claim 2 presents a laboratory and litigation risk even where claim 1 is avoided. The relevant question is not whether the product has the same brand formulation. It is whether the proposed formulation produces the claimed cumulative and interval release values under the patent’s testing conditions. What formulation components are protected?The dependent claims create multiple formulation-specific layers of protection. Drug-containing coreClaims 3 through 7 cover several core configurations:
These claims protect both an active-loaded matrix or bead and a drug coating applied to an inert starter bead. The use of spherical beads is commercially relevant because multiparticulate systems can be filled into capsules and can provide more consistent coating performance than irregular particles. Delayed-release layerClaims 8, 9, 12, 13, and 18 cover an enteric or pH-dependent outer layer. The key functional limitation is insolubility in aqueous media below pH 5.5. The listed materials include:
Claim 13 is particularly formulation-specific. It recites methacrylic acid copolymer Type B together with mono- and diglycerides, dibutyl sebacate, and polysorbate 80. A competitor that uses a different enteric polymer could avoid this dependent claim but may remain exposed to the broader functional limitations of claim 1. Sustained-release layerClaims 10, 11, and 14 through 17 cover the intermediate sustained-release coating. The claimed architecture may include:
The combination of ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, dibutyl sebacate, and magnesium stearate in claims 16 and 17 creates a narrower but commercially meaningful species claim. Ethyl cellulose supplies a water-insoluble permeable barrier, while the water-soluble component and plasticizer can modify permeability and mechanical properties. Does the patent cover abuse-deterrent methylphenidate?Yes. Claims 19 through 21 cover a formulation that includes an abuse-deterrent agent or nasal irritant. Claim 20 requires a nasal irritant. Claim 21 identifies:
These limitations address non-oral misuse, particularly crushing followed by nasal administration. The claims do not require that the entire product satisfy an independent abuse-deterrence standard. They require the presence of the claimed agent in an otherwise qualifying methylphenidate composition. The abuse-deterrent claims are narrower than claim 1. A formulation without a nasal irritant can still infringe claim 1 if it meets the core, coating, and dissolution limitations. What capsule and dose forms are covered?Claims 22 through 24 extend protection from individual beads to a commercial capsule product. Claim 22 covers the solid oral composition as a particulate bead. Claim 23 covers multiple beads contained in a water-soluble capsule. Claim 24 covers a dose containing 1 mg to 150 mg of methylphenidate or a pharmaceutical salt. This range encompasses typical clinical strengths and permits different bead populations or coating configurations to be placed in one capsule. The claims do not require a particular capsule color, capsule size, release label, or commercial strength. The broad dose range increases coverage across potential generic strengths. A generic developer cannot assume that a different strength avoids claim 24 if the bead and capsule limitations remain present. What pharmacokinetic claims does US 9,023,389 contain?Claims 25 and 26 add in-human pharmacokinetic limitations. Claim 25 requires:
Claim 26 requires:
These claims protect the in-vivo consequence of the formulation, not merely its physical structure. They are significant in ANDA litigation because a generic applicant may have to address both dissolution behavior and bioequivalence-related pharmacokinetic data. The claims also create proof issues. Infringement analysis would require reliable human pharmacokinetic evidence, defined dosing conditions, and a valid comparison against the claimed thresholds. A product may satisfy the dissolution profile but fail the human PK limitations, or satisfy the PK profile through a different formulation architecture. What is the Orange Book status of US 9,023,389?US 9,023,389 is listed by FDA in connection with JORNAY PM, a methylphenidate hydrochloride delayed- and extended-release capsule product approved under NDA 209311.[1][2] The JORNAY PM label identifies the following patent numbers as associated with the product:
The Orange Book listing does not independently establish validity or enforceability. It identifies patents submitted by the NDA holder or applicant as covering the approved drug, its formulation, or an approved method of use.[2] JORNAY PM received FDA approval in 2018. Its delayed-release and extended-release profile is designed for evening administration, with clinical effect beginning after the overnight delay and continuing through the daytime period.[1] When does US 9,023,389 lose exclusivity?The listed patent expiration date is August 20, 2027. The patent’s ordinary term is based on the earliest relevant nonprovisional filing in the family and is not calculated from the JORNAY PM approval date. A generic applicant could potentially launch before that date only through:
If FDA-granted pediatric exclusivity attaches to the relevant listed patents, the effective FDA protection period may extend beyond the ordinary patent expiration. The exact impact depends on the applicable FDA exclusivity record and the patents to which the exclusivity is attached. How strong is the patent estate?The estate has high structural coverage but is not uniformly broad across all claims. Strongest protectionThe most defensible commercial coverage is concentrated in:
These elements correspond closely to the product’s clinical differentiation. More designable protectionThe following limitations are easier to design around:
A competing company could pursue an alternative technology such as an osmotic system, matrix tablet, ion-exchange resin, coated tablet, or different multiparticulate coating system. Avoiding a listed excipient would not be enough if the alternative still satisfies claim 1’s functional and structural limitations. Which competing methylphenidate products face different patent risks?JORNAY PM is distinct from other methylphenidate products because its key commercial feature is delayed overnight release.
The highest direct risk is for a generic or follow-on product that uses coated methylphenidate beads to reproduce the JORNAY PM release profile. Products using tablets, suspensions, transdermal systems, or unrelated release mechanisms face a lower literal overlap risk but may encounter other patents. What Paragraph IV and litigation risks exist?A generic applicant seeking approval before August 2027 would need to address each Orange Book-listed patent through a Paragraph IV certification, a Paragraph III certification, or another applicable pathway. The practical litigation issues would likely include:
No settlement agreement or active Paragraph IV challenger is established by the claim text alone. FDA’s Orange Book identifies the listed patents but does not provide a complete litigation history.[2] Are there manufacturing and geographic barriers?The patent is enforceable only within its jurisdictional scope. US 9,023,389 primarily creates a U.S. risk for:
Manufacturing know-how may create a separate barrier. The critical technical variables include:
A non-U.S. patent family could create parallel risks, but foreign rights must be analyzed country by country. The U.S. patent does not automatically establish protection in Europe, Canada, Japan, or other markets. What is the commercial exposure from this patent?JORNAY PM is a differentiated methylphenidate product because it is taken in the evening and is intended to provide delayed onset followed by daytime coverage. The patent therefore protects a commercially meaningful delivery profile rather than a routine extended-release formulation. Commercial exposure depends on:
The principal risk to the patent owner is a successful design-around using a different delivery mechanism. The principal risk to a generic developer is that a superficially different coating system may still meet the functional release limitations. Key Takeaways
FAQsWhat is the main inventive concept in US 9,023,389?The main concept is a methylphenidate bead with an inner sustained-release layer and an outer delayed-release layer that produces an overnight lag followed by daytime drug release. Does US 9,023,389 cover all extended-release methylphenidate products?No. The claims are directed to a specific layered oral composition and release profile. Tablets, suspensions, transdermal products, and other formulations may not fall within the claims. Can a generic avoid the patent by changing the enteric polymer?Changing the polymer may avoid a narrow dependent claim, but it will not necessarily avoid claim 1. The generic must also assess the overall layered structure and dissolution profile. Is JORNAY PM a biologic subject to biosimilar substitution?No. JORNAY PM contains the small-molecule drug methylphenidate hydrochloride. It is subject to generic-drug regulation under the Hatch-Waxman framework, not the biosimilar pathway. What testing is most important for a potential generic launch?The critical testing includes the sequential USP Apparatus I dissolution protocol, coating and bead characterization, stability testing, and human pharmacokinetic studies addressing lag time, AUC, Cmax, and Tmax. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,023,389
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ironshore Pharms | JORNAY PM | methylphenidate hydrochloride | CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL | 209311-001 | Aug 8, 2018 | RX | Yes | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Ironshore Pharms | JORNAY PM | methylphenidate hydrochloride | CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL | 209311-002 | Aug 8, 2018 | RX | Yes | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Ironshore Pharms | JORNAY PM | methylphenidate hydrochloride | CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL | 209311-003 | Aug 8, 2018 | RX | Yes | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Ironshore Pharms | JORNAY PM | methylphenidate hydrochloride | CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL | 209311-004 | Aug 8, 2018 | RX | Yes | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Ironshore Pharms | JORNAY PM | methylphenidate hydrochloride | CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL | 209311-005 | Aug 8, 2018 | RX | Yes | Yes | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | Y | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 9,023,389
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2012230733 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2016228307 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2018202002 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Brazil | 112013024401 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Canada | 2830788 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
