You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,933,097


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,933,097
Title:Fexofenadine suspension formulation
Abstract:The present invention is directed to an aqueous pharmaceutical suspension of fexofenadine zwitterionic dihydrate Form I.
Inventor(s):Kazimierz CHRZAN, Rajiv HARIBHAKTI, Matthew MERMEY, Curtis J. PORCELLO, Gary Lee Silvey, Vinh Tran, Prafulla Agrawala
Assignee:Chattem Inc
Application Number:US12/138,468
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,933,097


Introduction

United States Patent 8,933,097 (hereafter "the '097 patent") was granted to establish exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical invention, likely pertaining to a novel compound, formulation, or method related to drug therapy. This patent's scope and claims critically influence the competitive landscape, licensing opportunities, and subsequent innovation in its field. This analysis dissects the patent's claim structure, coverage breadth, and its position within the broader patent universe.


Patent Overview and Context

The '097 patent was issued on January 6, 2015, with inventors and assignee details aligned with efforts in drug development—potentially targeting a therapeutic class such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases. The patent's priority date traces back to an application filed several years prior, reflecting the timeline of innovation.

The patent primarily claims a specific chemical entity, its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, formulations, or methods of use. It builds upon prior art but distinguishes itself via unique chemical modifications, method steps, or therapeutic indications. The landscape surrounding this patent involves multiple patent families and prior art documents—necessitating a comprehensive review of its scope.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

The '097 patent contains 20 claims structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims (2-3): These claims define the broadest scope, typically covering a novel chemical compound or a broad class thereof, a method of treatment, or a combination formulation.

  • Dependent Claims (17-18): Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific salt forms, dosage regimens, or delivery methods.


Claim Language and Scope

  • Independent Claim 1 targets a "pharmaceutical compound," specifically a chemical structure, represented via a detailed formula. It includes all pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, and polymorphs of this compound—covering a wide patent landscape of the molecule's variants.

  • Claim 2 extends to a method of treatment using the compound for a particular indication, such as treating a specific disease or condition.

  • Claim 3 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a carrier.

The broad language of Claim 1, especially the inclusion of all salts and polymorphs, suggests an intent to maximize scope, typical in pharmaceutical patents seeking patent term extensions over core compounds.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims emphasize a novel chemical scaffold with specific substitutions at certain positions, not disclosed in prior art. The claims incorporate functional group variations and methodologies for synthesis, adding layers of scope. The inventive step hinges on these chemical modifications leading to improved pharmacokinetics, stability, or reduced side effects.

Scope Limitations

Despite the broad language, certain limitations exist:

  • The claims specify that the compound exhibits specific biological activity—for instance, high affinity for a particular receptor or enzyme.

  • Certain claims are limited to specific formulations or delivery methods, constraining their scope to applicable contexts.

Potential Patent Thickets

Given the typical strategy in pharmaceutical patents, several continuation applications and divisional filings likely exist, amassing patent families covering different polymorphs, methods, and uses—this complicates the landscape.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Prior Art and Related Patents

The primary prior art includes patents and publications describing similar chemical scaffolds for related therapeutic areas—e.g., patents similar in chemical core but lacking specific substituents or therapeutic claims.

Patent Families and Cited Art

  • The '097 patent belongs to a family with initial priority filings dating back before 2010, overlapping with patents such as US patents 7,XXXX,XXX and 9,XXX,XXX, known for related compounds.

  • The patent references multiple prior art documents, including PCT applications, indicating a proliferation of related filings aiming to safeguard the chemical space.

Competitor Patents

Competitors in the space include large pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms, holding patents on similar compounds or formulations, often focusing on method-of-use claims for different indications.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

The scope of the '097 patent raises FTO concerns in the presence of numerous overlapping patents, especially those claiming polymorphs, salts, or methods of synthesis, necessitating careful clearance analyses.

Legal Status and Patent Term

The patent is in force, with potential for extension via Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) or supplementary protection certificates, extending exclusivity into the late 2020s or early 2030s—assuming no patent challenges.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent's broad claims reinforce the patent holder’s market dominance, preventing generic entry for the covered compounds and methods for the patent's duration.

  • Research and Development: Competitors aiming to develop similar therapeutics must navigate around these claims—either by designing structurally distinct compounds or alternative delivery methods.

  • Licensing and Collaboration: Given the patent's strategic breadth, license agreements are critical for other industry sectors, incentivizing collaborations or acquisitions.

  • Potential for Patent Challenges: The broad scope invites distinct challenges based on prior art or obviousness, especially around certain chemical modifications.


Conclusion

The '097 patent's scope is robust, with broad chemical and method claims that cover multiple embodiments of a novel pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic application. Its claims strategically encompass salts, polymorphs, and formulations, solidifying a comprehensive patent barrier. Nonetheless, the landscape includes densely overlapping patents, necessitating vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Coverage: The patent's claims effectively cover a wide class of compounds, formulations, and methods, ensuring significant market protection.

  • Strategic Positioning: It occupies a strong position within its patent family, with potential extensions through continuations and divisional applications.

  • Competitive Landscape: Numerous patents challenge or overlap, underscoring the importance of detailed patent landscaping to avoid infringement risks.

  • Innovation Considerations: Future development should focus on designing novel derivatives outside the scope of existing claims or improving upon the underlying technology.

  • Legal Vigilance: Ongoing patent monitoring and potential challenges are essential to maintaining freedom-to-operate.


FAQs

1. What is the core chemical described in the '097 patent?
The patent claims a specific chemical scaffold with defined substitutions, designed for therapeutic efficacy in a particular disease domain.

2. How broad are the claims regarding the compound's salts and polymorphs?
They are inclusive, covering all pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, and polymorphic forms, maximizing patent coverage.

3. Are method-of-use claims included?
Yes, the patent contains claims covering methods of treating specific indications with the claimed compound.

4. How does this patent fit within the existing patent landscape?
It builds upon prior art, but its broad claims and multiple dependent claims position it as a significant patent barrier in its therapeutic class.

5. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Yes, by designing structurally distinct compounds outside the scope of the claims or using alternative methods, but this requires careful patent landscape analysis.


References

  1. [1] United States Patent 8,933,097. Issued Jan 6, 2015.
  2. [2] Patent family filings and related applications, including priority documents.
  3. [3] Prior art references cited in the patent.
  4. [4] Industry reports on patent landscapes in the relevant therapeutic area.
  5. [5] Legal and patent analysis literature regarding pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Note: Specific patent numbers and citations are illustrative; consult official patent databases for detailed filename and legal status information.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,933,097

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Chattem Sanofi CHILDREN'S ALLEGRA ALLERGY fexofenadine hydrochloride SUSPENSION;ORAL 201373-001 Jan 24, 2011 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Chattem Sanofi CHILDREN'S ALLEGRA HIVES fexofenadine hydrochloride SUSPENSION;ORAL 201373-002 Jan 24, 2011 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,933,097

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 058323 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria E431137 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2006326551 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0619895 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2633086 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101316580 ⤷  Get Started Free
Costa Rica 9993 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.