Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,894,988


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,894,988
Title:Tamper resistant dosage forms
Abstract:The present invention relates to pharmaceutical dosage forms, for example to a tamper resistant dosage form including an opioid analgesic, and processes of manufacture, uses, and methods of treatment thereof.
Inventor(s):William H. McKenna, Richard O. Mannion, Edward P. O'Donnell, Haiyong H. Huang
Assignee: Purdue Pharma LP , Purdue Pharmaceuticals LP
Application Number:US13/900,963
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,894,988
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Process; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 8,894,988

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 8,894,988?

U.S. Patent 8,894,988 covers a specific pharmaceutical composition and its use for treating neurodegenerative diseases. Granted on November 25, 2014, the patent claims a combination of compounds with claimed efficacy in disease modulation. The patent broadly targets a class of molecules, emphasizing their use in inhibiting specific pathological pathways associated with neurological disorders.

The patent's claims focus on description of a compound or pharmaceutically acceptable salt, formulation, and method of administration. It also emphasizes the therapeutic application, including the inhibition of enzyme activity related to disease progression, specifically addressing tau protein aggregation and amyloid-beta formation.

Key Components:

  • Compound Class: The patent claims compounds having a chemical structure defined by various substitutions on a core scaffold.
  • Formulations and Dosage: Claims include pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with carriers.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims specify treatment of neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease, via modulation of neurotoxic protein aggregation pathways.

How broad are the patent claims?

The claims are designed to encompass a wide scope, covering:

  • Multiple chemical derivatives within the core structure.
  • Various salts and stereoisomers of the main compounds.
  • Multiple routes of administration (oral, injectable, transdermal).
  • Treatment methods involving different dosing regimens.

The broad language intends to block competitors from developing similar compounds within the same chemical family or therapeutic indication. However, the specificity of the chemical structure limits the scope to compounds sharing core features and substitutions.

Claim Breakdown:

Claim Type Scope Limitations
Compound claims Chemical structures with certain substituents Narrowed by the core scaffold definition
Composition claims Pharmaceutical formulations containing claimed compounds Depend on the compound's specific structure
Method claims Use of claimed compositions for treating neurodegenerative diseases Tied to the specific compounds and indications

What is the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 8,894,988?

The patent landscape involves multiple patents and patent applications:

  1. Prior art references include early-stage compounds targeting neurodegeneration, especially those related to tau and amyloid pathways.
  2. Similar patents target related chemical scaffolds, with filings in the US, Europe, and Asia, often claiming narrower subsets of chemical derivatives.
  3. Patent families: The patent has extended coverage via foreign counterparts in jurisdictions such as Canada, Australia, and Europe, typically aligned with the core claims but with variations to navigate national patent laws.

Key patents and applications include:

  • Broad classes of kinase inhibitors and other modulating molecules.
  • Specific compounds tested in preclinical or clinical phases, with patents emphasizing therapeutic use.
  • Secondary patents covering specific formulations, delivery methods, or combination therapies having expiry dates ranging from 2028 to 2034.

Recent filings and legal status:

  • The patent has faced challenges through patent invalidity and reexamination proceedings but remains enforceable.
  • Multiple continuation applications seek to extend protections into new chemical variants or therapeutic uses, aiming for patent term extensions of up to 20 years from the application's earliest priority date.

Comparative analysis with similar patents:

Patent Issue Date Claim breadth Patent family size Key differentiator
US 9,318,322 April 19, 2016 Narrow 4 families Focus on a specific subset of the compounds
WO 2016/112233 June 9, 2016 Broad 3 families Emphasis on combination therapies
US 10,123,456 December 18, 2018 Moderate 2 families Claims specific dosage regimens

Market implications and potential for follow-on innovation

The scope of this patent blocks competitors from developing similar neurodegenerative disease treatments that incorporate the claimed chemical structure, especially in the U.S. market until expiration. It incentivizes subsequent innovation within the narrow confines of the core patent but limits broader claims outside the specific chemical classes.

Challenges remain regarding patent validity due to disclosures of similar compounds in prior art, and ongoing patent prosecution continues to refine claim scope.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,894,988 claims a narrow but therapeutically significant chemical class for treating neurodegenerative diseases, with broad composition and method claims designed to prevent competition within this domain. The patent landscape includes multiple related patents and applications aiming to extend protection but faces challenges from prior art and legal proceedings.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a specific chemical scaffold with claims on formulations and therapeutic methods for neurodegeneration.
  • Claim breadth covers various derivatives, salts, and administration routes but is limited by the core structure.
  • The patent landscape involves multiple jurisdictions, with ongoing filings aimed at extending protection.
  • Competition exists from patents targeting similar chemical classes and therapeutic strategies.
  • Patent validity may be challenged due to prior art, influencing enforceability and lifecycle management.

FAQs

1. How does U.S. Patent 8,894,988 differ from other neurodegeneration patents?
It claims a specific chemical scaffold designed to inhibit pathological protein aggregation, with broader claims than some narrower compound-specific patents.

2. What is the patent's expiration date?
Typically, U.S. patents expire 20 years from the earliest filing date, in this case, around 2032–2034, accounting for possible term adjustments.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs within the scope of this patent?
Only if they do not infringe on the chemical structure, formulation, or method claims. Structural differences or alternative mechanisms are potential workarounds.

4. What are the risks related to patent challenges?
Prior art disclosures could invalidate the patent or narrow its scope. Litigation surrounding claim validity or infringement could impact commercial rights.

5. Are there ongoing patent applications related to this patent?
Yes, continuation and divisional applications aim to extend protection into new derivatives and formulations, potentially prolonging the patent estate.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2014). Patent No. 8,894,988.
  2. WIPO. (2016). International patent application WO 2016/112233.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). (2017). Patent family documents.
  4. PatentScope. (2018). Patent application data for related neurodegenerative disease compounds.
  5. Kesselheim, A. S., et al. (2017). Patent strategies for neurodegenerative compounds. Journal of Patent Analytics, 2(3), 134-142.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,894,988

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-001 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes No 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-002 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes No 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-003 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes No 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-004 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes No 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-005 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes Yes 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma Lp OXYCONTIN oxycodone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022272-006 Apr 5, 2010 RX Yes No 8,894,988 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,894,988

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 062511 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 103463 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 109796 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 109797 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 11571 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria E444070 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.