Share This Page
Details for Patent: 8,828,356
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 8,828,356
| Title: | Farnesyltransferase inhibitors for treatment of laminopathies, cellular aging and atherosclerosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Although it can be farnesylated, the mutant lamin A protein expressed in Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) cannot be defarnesylated because the characteristic mutation causes deletion of a cleavage site necessary for binding the protease ZMPSTE24 and effecting defarnesylation. The result is an aberrant farnesylated protein (called “progerin”) that alters normal lamin A function as a dominant negative, as well as assuming its own aberrant function through its association with the nuclear membrane. The retention of farnesylation, and potentially other abnormal properties of progerin and other abnormal lamin gene protein products, produces disease. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) (both direct effectors and indirect inhibitors) will inhibit the formation of progerin, cause a decrease in lamin A protein, and/or an increase prelamin A protein. Decreasing the amount of aberrant protein improves cellular effects caused by and progerin expression. Similarly, treatment with FTIs should improve disease status in progeria and other laminopathies. In addition, elements of atherosclerosis and aging in non-laminopathy individuals will improve after treatment with farnesyltransferase inhibitors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Leslie B. Gordon, Francis S. Collins, Thomas Glover, Michael W. Glynn, Brian C. Capell, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , University of Michigan System , Progeria Research Foundation Inc , US Department of Health and Human Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US13/857,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 8,828,356: Scope, Claims, Expiration, and Lonafarnib Patent LandscapeUS Patent 8,828,356 covers methods of treating Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome, or HGPS, by administering a farnesyltransferase inhibitor. The broadest claim reaches any therapeutically effective FTI used to reduce at least one HGPS symptom, prevent disease progression, or slow progression. Dependent claims narrow the protection to specified symptoms, FTIs, doses, combination therapy, and lonafarnib, also known as SCH66336. The patent is important because it claims the therapeutic use of an FTI in HGPS rather than the chemical composition of lonafarnib itself. Its commercial relevance is tied primarily to Zokinvy, the FDA-approved lonafarnib product for HGPS and certain progeroid laminopathies. What does US Patent 8,828,356 protect?The patent protects a treatment method with four core elements:
Claim 1 is the principal broad claim:
The claim does not limit the treatment to lonafarnib. It covers the therapeutic use of the FTI class, subject to the other limitations in the claim. The claim also does not require a specific symptom, dose, administration schedule, route, formulation, biomarker, or genotype. A treatment can potentially fall within claim 1 if it uses an FTI in an HGPS patient and produces a clinical symptom reduction. Claim structure and practical scope
How broad is claim 1 of US 8,828,356?Claim 1 is broad in drug identity and clinical outcome but narrow in disease indication. It requires HGPS, not merely a progeroid disorder, laminopathy, cardiovascular disease, or a mutation affecting lamin A processing. The principal breadth points are:
The main limiting feature is the requirement that the subject have HGPS. A product used exclusively for oncology, viral disease, or another non-HGPS indication would not infringe merely because it is an FTI. What symptoms are covered?Claims 2 and 3 provide a nonexclusive list of protected clinical manifestations. The listed symptoms include:
Because claim 1 refers to “at least one clinical symptom,” the dependent symptom claims do not exhaust the potential symptom scope of claim 1. Claim 1 can reach a symptom not expressly listed in claim 2 if the other claim elements are met. Which farnesyltransferase inhibitors are named in the patent?Claim 5 identifies six FTI categories or compounds:
Claim 11 separately narrows the invention to lonafarnib, identified as SCH66336. Lonafarnib is the compound used in Zokinvy. The derivative language in claim 5 is potentially significant. It does not cover every chemical analog automatically. A derivative must maintain farnesyltransferase inhibitory activity and must also satisfy the method-of-treatment limitations. A compound with a different mechanism, such as a geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor without FTI activity, would fall outside the literal scope of that limitation. What dose of lonafarnib is covered?Claim 12 covers:
The claim is broader than a single commercial dose because it establishes a floor rather than a fixed upper limit. A lonafarnib regimen of 115 mg/m² twice daily or higher can satisfy the dose limitation, assuming the treatment otherwise meets claim 11 and the underlying claim 1 requirements. The FDA-approved Zokinvy regimen uses body-surface-area dosing. FDA labeling describes an initial dosage of 115 mg/m² twice daily with food, followed by an increase to 150 mg/m² twice daily after an initial treatment period, subject to product-specific maximum doses and patient factors (FDA, 2020). This creates a direct overlap between claim 12 and the commercial treatment regimen. The patent claim, however, is not limited to the exact Zokinvy label. It does not require a specific capsule strength, treatment duration, food instruction, or maximum dose. Dose-related claim construction issuesClaims 8, 9, 13, and 14 use different dose units:
These units are not interchangeable without molecular-weight and dosing-context calculations. A court would ordinarily construe each limitation according to its stated unit. Claims 8, 13, and 14 appear to describe concentration-normalized amounts, while claims 9 and 10 use mass per body weight. Claim 12 uses body-surface-area dosing, which is the format used in the Zokinvy label. The coexistence of these ranges may create claim-construction and enablement issues if the specification does not provide adequate support across the full breadth of each range. The strongest commercial claim is likely claim 11 in combination with claim 12 because it tracks the approved active ingredient and the FDA-recognized dosing framework. Does the patent cover combination treatment?Yes. Claim 6 covers administration of an FTI together with a second therapeutic compound. Claim 7 specifies that the second compound is not another FTI. The claims therefore reach combination regimens involving lonafarnib and a non-FTI agent, provided that:
The combination claims may be relevant to future HGPS regimens involving cardiovascular, bone, metabolic, or supportive treatments. They do not necessarily cover the second compound as a standalone product or monotherapy. What is the FDA status of lonafarnib and Zokinvy?FDA approved Zokinvy capsules on November 20, 2020, for reducing the risk of mortality in patients one year of age and older with genetically confirmed HGPS or certain processing-deficient progeroid laminopathies with a body-surface area of at least 0.39 m² (FDA, 2020).
The approved indication is narrower and more precisely defined than claim 1 of US 8,828,356. The patent claims symptom reduction and disease progression in HGPS, while the FDA indication focuses on mortality-risk reduction and includes specified progeroid laminopathies beyond classic HGPS. FDA approval does not establish patent validity or infringement. It establishes the approved regulatory use and labeling framework. What is the Orange Book status of US 8,828,356?US Patent 8,828,356 is a method-of-use patent associated with the therapeutic use of lonafarnib in HGPS. Its commercial significance depends on whether it is listed in the FDA Orange Book for the relevant Zokinvy NDA and whether any listed-use patent remains enforceable at the time of an ANDA filing. Orange Book listing is legally important because an ANDA applicant must address listed patents through one of four certifications:
An Orange Book-listed method-of-use patent generally does not block every generic use of the active ingredient. The practical scope depends on the use code submitted by the NDA holder. A generic applicant may attempt a section viii statement seeking approval for indications or uses outside the patented method, subject to the FDA’s treatment of the use code. The patent’s claims are directed to HGPS treatment. If the patent is listed with a corresponding HGPS use code, a Paragraph IV challenge could target the validity, enforceability, or noninfringement of the HGPS method claims. When does US Patent 8,828,356 lose exclusivity?The patent term is governed by the earliest effective nonprovisional or international filing date under the patent-term statute, subject to patent-term adjustment and other statutory modifications. The issuance date, September 9, 2014, does not determine the expiration date. Public patent records identify the patent as an HGPS treatment patent with a mid-2000s priority and filing history. The enforceable expiration date should be taken from the USPTO Patent Center patent-term calculation and any later terminal disclaimer or adjustment record. The FDA Orange Book may display a different practical date if the patent is listed there and if pediatric exclusivity or other regulatory periods affect the blocking period. The separate regulatory exclusivity timeline is more straightforward:
Orphan exclusivity and patent protection are separate. Orphan exclusivity can block approval of the same drug for the same disease or condition, while a patent can block covered use, manufacture, sale, or importation. How strong is the patent estate for lonafarnib?The estate has meaningful commercial strength for the original HGPS use because claim 11 identifies lonafarnib and claim 12 tracks the approved dose threshold. Its strength is lower for broader FTI research programs because the patent does not claim the FTI molecule itself and does not necessarily prevent non-HGPS uses. Strengths
Vulnerabilities
The patent does not claim lonafarnib as a composition of matter. That distinction generally makes the estate less resistant to invalidity challenges than a new-molecule patent, but it can still provide substantial blocking power for the patented clinical use. What patent litigation and Paragraph IV risks affect Zokinvy?The key generic-entry risk is a method-of-use challenge directed to the HGPS indication. A potential ANDA filer could assert that:
The most difficult claim for a challenger to avoid may be claim 11 combined with claim 12 if the proposed label includes lonafarnib for HGPS at or above 115 mg/m² twice daily. A label that omits HGPS and is limited to a nonpatented indication would present a stronger noninfringement position, although FDA use-code treatment and induced-infringement principles would remain relevant. No litigation result can be inferred from the claim text alone. Patent litigation status must be determined from federal court dockets, ANDA notices, USPTO records, and FDA listing information. How does US 8,828,356 compare with the Zokinvy product position?
What manufacturing and geographic barriers remain?US 8,828,356 is a US method patent. It does not, by itself, establish patent protection in Europe, Japan, China, Canada, or other jurisdictions. Geographic protection must be assessed family-by-family. The patent also does not necessarily block:
Manufacturing barriers may arise from separate composition, formulation, process, or impurity-control patents. They may also arise from know-how, controlled supply chains, low-volume economics, and the limited patient population. Those commercial barriers are distinct from the claims of US 8,828,356. Key Takeaways
FAQsDoes US 8,828,356 cover tipifarnib for HGPS?Potentially. Claim 5 names R115777, also known as tipifarnib, as an FTI covered by the patent when used in the claimed HGPS treatment method. Does the patent cover treatment of mandibuloacral dysplasia?Not expressly as a standalone disease. The central claims require a subject having HGPS. Coverage of another progeroid laminopathy would depend on claim construction, the factual diagnosis, and whether the disease falls within the claimed HGPS limitation. Can a generic company sell lonafarnib for cancer without infringing this patent?Possibly. The patent claims treatment of HGPS, not all uses of lonafarnib. A cancer-only product and label would require separate analysis of the proposed label, marketing conduct, and induced-infringement risk. Is claim 12 limited to pediatric patients?No express age limitation appears in claim 12. The claim requires lonafarnib treatment at a dose of at least 115 mg/m² twice daily in a subject covered by the underlying claims. Does the patent protect the Zokinvy capsule formulation?Not through the claims provided. The claims focus on the therapeutic method, active FTI, disease, symptom or progression outcome, and dose. A separate formulation patent would be required for specific capsule composition or delivery-system protection. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,828,356
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 8,828,356
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 547536 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2003301446 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Canada | 2501464 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| European Patent Office | 1552020 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| European Patent Office | 1853265 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Japan | 2006507845 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
