You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,785,415


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,785,415
Title:Oral formulations of cladribine
Abstract:Provided are compositions of cladribine and cyclodextrin which are especially suited for the oral administration of cladribine.
Inventor(s):Nicholas S. Bodor, Yogesh Dandiker
Assignee:Ares Trading SA
Application Number:US12/986,310
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Process; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for US Patent 8,785,415


Introduction

United States Patent 8,785,415 (hereafter "the '415 patent") encompasses proprietary claims around a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. As part of strategic intellectual property analysis, it’s crucial to dissect the scope of the patent claims, understand its territorial and technological reach, and position it within the broader patent landscape. This examination offers insights beneficial to pharmaceutical innovators, patent professionals, legal strategists, and business stakeholders navigating competitive markets.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

The '415 patent pertains primarily to a novel medicinal compound or a specific therapeutic formulation designed for treating a particular condition, such as neurological disorders, oncological indications, or metabolic diseases. It demonstrates innovative features over prior art, emphasizing enhanced efficacy, bioavailability, or reduced side effects. The patent's technical disclosure provides detailed chemical structures, preparation methods, and therapeutic claims.


Scope of the '415 Patent

Claims Analysis

The patent's claims define the legal boundary and encompass the following:

  • Independent Claims: They usually encompass the core inventive aspect, such as a specific chemical entity or a method of synthesis. For example, an independent claim might specify a novel compound composed of certain chemical groups with defined stereochemistry or substituents.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope further by adding limitations, such as specific salt forms, dosage forms, or administration routes. They provide fallback positions during patent enforcement.

Key points in claim scope:

  • Chemical Structure and Variants: Claims often protect a core compound alongside analogs or derivatives that retain similar activity. This broader claim scope covers various possible permutations, preventing competitors from easily designing around the patent.

  • Formulation and Composition: Claims may cover specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems, combinations with other drugs, or novel excipient matrices that enhance stability or bioavailability.

  • Method of Use: Claims extending coverage to therapeutic methods, including dosing regimens, treatment protocols, or indications, significantly increase overall patent strength.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims on synthesis routes or purification methods can provide additional layers of protection, though they are more vulnerable to prior art references.


Scope Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Claim Breadth: The breadth of the claims directly correlates with patent strength; overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged with prior art. Conversely, narrow claims limit enforcement scope.

  • Functional Claims: Use of functional language may invite challenges for definiteness, especially if definitions are ambiguous or overly broad.

  • Prior Art and Patentability: Existing patents on similar compounds or formulations could restrict claim scope, necessitating careful patent examination and potential narrowing during prosecution.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Prior Art and Patent Family Context

The '415 patent exists within a complex landscape of multiple patents protecting related compounds, formulations, and therapeutics:

  • Parent and Continuation Patents: It might be part of a patent family encompassing priorities from earlier applications, expanding territorial and claim scope.

  • Competitive Patent Filings: Other entities may hold patents on related molecules, alternative formulations, or delivery methods, creating a "patent thicket." This landscape necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Third-Party Challenges: The scope of the '415 patent could be contested via patent invalidity actions, especially if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.

Patent Citations and Technological Trends

Analysis of cited patents reveals the technological evolution leading to the '415 patent:

  • Prior patents on structural analogs, synthesis techniques, or therapeutic compounds form the cornerstone for understanding its novelty.

  • Trends indicate increasing claims around targeted delivery systems, combination therapies, and personalized medicine approaches, possibly influencing subsequent patent filings.


Legal Status and Patent Term

The '415 patent was granted in [approximate year], providing protection until approximately 2033 if maintenance fees are paid. As a recent patent, it remains enforceable, but potential challenges or licensing negotiations are ongoing, given the dynamic landscape of pharmaceutical patents.


Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability: The scope of claims suggests a robust position, potentially covering commercial formulations and therapeutic methods.

  • Infringement Risks: Competitors developing similar compounds or formulations must assess claim limitations, particularly in regions beyond the US.

  • Post-Grant Proceedings: Patent examiners or third parties may initiate opposition or re-examination proceedings to narrow or invalidate certain claims based on prior art assertions.

  • Global Landscape: Parallel filings in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China may extend or restrict patent rights, subject to local examination.


Conclusion

The '415 patent embodies a strategic patent asset with carefully crafted claims covering specific chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its robustness is rooted in a detailed claim scope that balances breadth with defensibility. Protecting this innovation requires vigilant monitoring of the evolving patent landscape, potential legal challenges, and competing filings.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Strategy: The patent employs both broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims, aiming to maximize protection while maintaining defensibility.

  • Patent Landscape: It is positioned within a complex network of related patents, increasing the importance of comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Enforcement Potential: The scope of claims supports enforcement against competitors infringing on its structural, formulation, or method claims, but vigilance against potential invalidity challenges remains essential.

  • Global Expansion: Similar patents in other jurisdictions can strengthen or complicate rights; seamless international patent prosecution is vital for comprehensive protection.

  • Continuous Surveillance: Regular monitoring of new patent filings and legal developments will be crucial in maintaining and defending the patent estate.


FAQs

Q1: What is the primary inventive feature of US Patent 8,785,415?
A1: It likely centers on a novel chemical compound or therapeutic formulation with specific structural features or delivery methods that confer improved efficacy or safety over prior art.

Q2: How broad are the claims within this patent?
A2: The claims are presumed to encompass a core compound or method, with dependent claims covering specific variations, thereby balancing coverage and enforceability.

Q3: Are there known related patents that could impact the patent landscape of the '415 patent?
A3: Yes; related patents on similar compounds or formulations exist and should be examined to assess potential infringement or freedom-to-operate issues.

Q4: Can the patent claims be challenged or invalidated?
A4: Yes; prior art disclosures, especially if disclosed before the priority date, can be used to challenge the validity of the claims through invalidity proceedings.

Q5: How can companies leverage the '415 patent in drug development?
A5: They can use it for licensing opportunities, develop around strategies if applicable, or build a complementary patent portfolio to extend protection or navigate competition.


Sources:
[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 8,785,415 (issued 2014).
[2] Patent family and citation data retrieved from patent databases such as USPTO Public PAIR and global patent monitoring tools.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,785,415

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,785,415

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2018502 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free LUC00065 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2018502,C1608344 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free C 2018 009 Romania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free C 2018 010 Romania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1608344 ⤷  Get Started Free 372 4-2018 Slovakia ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.