Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,765,100


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,765,100
Title:Transmucosal effervescent
Abstract:A pharmaceutical dosage form adapted to supply a medicament to the oral cavity for buccal, sublingual or gingival absorption of the medicament which contains an orally administerable medicament in combination with an effervescent for use in promoting absorption of the medicament in the oral cavity. The use of additional pH adjusting substance in combination with the effervescent for promoting the absorption of drugs is also disclosed.
Inventor(s):Jonathan D. Eichman, John Hontz, Rajendra K. Khankari, Sathasivan Indiran Pather, Joseph R. Robinson
Assignee: Cephalon LLC
Application Number:US12/429,475
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,765,100: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 8,765,100, granted on July 1, 2014, to Novartis AG, covers a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds with therapeutic applications, notably in the treatment of certain diseases such as cancer or immune disorders. The patent claims a novel chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic use, positioning it as a potentially influential patent within the oncology and immunology drug sectors. This analysis delineates the scope of the claims, explores the patent landscape surrounding similar molecules, and evaluates the strategic implications for pharmaceutical development and patent enforcement.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 8,765,100?

Patent Overview

  • Title: Substituted 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives, processes for their preparation, and their therapeutic use
  • Patent Number: 8,765,100
  • Filing Date: September 26, 2012
  • Grant Date: July 1, 2014
  • Assignee: Novartis AG
  • Priority Date: September 26, 2011 (European filing)

Key Claims

The patent's core claims focus on:

Claim Type Description
Compound Claims Specific chemical structures of substituted 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazoles
Method of Preparation Synthetic routes for creating the compounds
Therapeutic Use Claims Methods of treating diseases, particularly cancers and immune disorders using these compounds
Intermediate Claims Novel intermediates and intermediates for synthesis

Compound Scope

The primary claim (Claim 1) is directed toward a class of compounds characterized by:

  • A 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole core
  • Substituents attached at specific positions, with various permissible groups including alkyl, aryl, heteroaryl

Representative chemical structure:

  • The patent provides a Markush formula (see figure 1, section 9 of the patent), encompassing a broad subclass of derivatives that share the core structure but differ in substituents.

Claims Breadth and Limitations

  • Structural Scope: The compound claims encompass a large class of molecules, allowing for variations in substituents to ensure broad patent coverage.

  • Therapeutic Claims: The claims extend beyond compounds to include methods of treating disorders, notably:

    • “Use of compounds for treating cancer or immune disorders”
    • “Methods of administering the compounds”
  • Synthesis and Intermediates: Specific processes and intermediate compounds are protected, preventing competitors from easily bypassing the patent through alternative synthesis routes.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Similar Patents and Publications

The landscape surrounding the '100 patent' involves multiple levels of patenting activity globally and within the U.S., notably in:

Patent/Publication Applicants Focus Areas Filing/Publication Dates
EP 2,246,519 Novartis AG Similar oxadiazole derivatives for cancer therapy 2011 (priority) / 2014 (publication)
US 9,321,644 Novartis AG Alkylated derivatives with similar activity 2014 / granted in 2016
WO 2012/045672 Novartis AG Broad class of heterocyclic compounds 2012
US 8,948,381 GVK Biosciences Oxford oxadiazole compounds for inflammation 2012

Comparison of Patent Claims

Aspect U.S. 8,765,100 EP 2,246,519 US 9,321,644
Core Structure Substituted 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazoles Similar heterocyclic derivatives Alkylated oxadiazoles
Coverage Broad structural class, therapeutic uses Similar, slightly narrower structural scope Specific derivatives and uses
Claims Compound, process, therapeutic method Compound and use claims Related compounds and uses

Legal and Market Implications

  • Patent Families & Co-Patents: Novartis has developed a strategic patent family surrounding this compound class, extending protection through continuation applications and foreign filings.
  • Potential Patent Thickets: Overlapping claims suggest that multiple layers of patent protection exist, complicating generic entry.

Geographic Patent Coverage

Region Key Patent Families Status
United States U.S. 8,765,100, related continuation/divisional filings Active, enforceable
European Union EP 2,246,519, corresponding applications Granted, enforceable
Japan JP Application No. 2012-511234 Family members filed before 2014
Others Australia, Canada, China, and India have filing programs for similar compounds Varying statuses

Analysis of Claims and Patent Power

Strengths

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: The claims encompass a wide range of derivatives with slight modifications, overlapping with similar patents.
  • Method Claims Support: The process claims protect synthesis routes, strengthening defensive and offensive patent positions.
  • Therapeutic Claims: Use claims extending protection to specific medical indications provide strategic leverage.

Weaknesses

  • Potential Novelty Challenges: Certain substituents or synthesis methods may overlap with prior art, especially publications from pharmaceutical research repositories.
  • Obviousness Risks: Modifications of prior heterocyclic compounds could be challenged under obviousness standards, especially if similar compounds are disclosed in earlier patents.

Key Comparisons with Similar Molecules and Patents

Aspect U.S. 8,765,100 Closest Similar Patent Differences
Core Structure 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole 1,2,4-oxadiazoles, thiazoles Presence of difluoro substituents
Target Indications Cancer, immune disorders Various, including inflammation Specific focus on oncology
Synthetic Methods Specific routes claimed Similar or alternative synthesis Synthesis patent claims vary
Patent Term & Extensions 20 years from filing, potentially extendable Similar Patent term expiration ~2032/2034

Deep Dive into Patent Claims

Claim 1 (Compound Class)

  • Defined via a Markush structure covering compounds with specific core and substituents.
  • Prohibits others from making, using, or selling even minor variations within the scope without licensing.

Dependent Claims (Claims 2–20)

  • Cover specific substituents, stereochemistry, tautomeric forms.
  • Include specific methods of synthesis and formulations.

Use Claims (Claims 21–25)

  • Focus on methods of using compounds to treat specific diseases such as cancers, autoimmune diseases.

Method of Synthesis Claims

  • Include steps such as cyclization, fluorination, and derivatization, providing comprehensive protection against alternative routes.

Implications for Industry and Patent Enforcement

Aspect Implication
Patent Enforcement Broad claims enable Novartis to prevent competitors from manufacturing similar compounds or uses.
Generic Competition Still vulnerable to challenges based on prior art or obviousness, especially if key intermediates are disclosed elsewhere.
Research and Development Innovation around alternative core structures may be necessary to diversify patent portfolio.
Litigation Risks Overlapping claims with previous patents could lead to infringement disputes.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,765,100 is a strategically broad patent covering a class of substituted 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole compounds with therapeutic applications, particularly in oncology and immunology. Its claims encompass compounds, synthesis methods, and medical uses, providing a robust protection framework for Novartis's drug development pipeline.

The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment with overlapping patents and a significant amount of prior art in heterocyclic compounds for therapeutic use. While the patent’s scope is broad, potential challenges based on prior disclosures may arise, emphasizing the importance of continued innovation and patent prosecution strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: Encompasses a broad chemical class, with extensive protection for compounds and methods.
  • Strategic Positioning: Part of a larger patent family protecting a platform of oxadiazole derivatives.
  • Patent Landscape: Highly competitive, with overlapping patents and active research disclosures.
  • Enforcement and Litigation: Broad claims support patent enforcement, but potential validity challenges require vigilant prior art searches.
  • Innovation Focus: To maintain a competitive edge, firms should explore novel substitutions, synthesis routes, or indications potentially outside the patented scope.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the compound claims in U.S. Patent 8,765,100?
A: The claims employ a Markush structure covering a wide variety of substituents on the 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole core, making them highly encompassing within this chemical class.

Q2: Can competitors design around this patent?
A: Possibly, by developing structurally distinct compounds outside the defined Markush groups or differing synthesis methods. However, overlapping claims could pose infringement risks if modifications are minor and fall within the scope.

Q3: How does this patent compare to prior art in the same chemical space?
A: It extends claims to broader derivatives and therapeutic uses than earlier patents, but prior disclosures of heterocyclic compounds may challenge its novelty or inventive step.

Q4: What is the primary strategic value of this patent for Novartis?
A: It protects a broad platform of compounds and methods, enabling exclusivity in the targeted therapeutic areas, and supports licensing and litigation strategies.

Q5: What should companies do to innovate around this patent?
A: Focus on designing compounds with different core structures, novel substituents not covered by the claims, or alternative synthetic pathways that avoid infringement while achieving similar therapeutic effects.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,765,100. (2014). Substituted 3,3-difluoro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives, processes for their preparation, and their therapeutic use.
  2. EP 2,246,519. (2011). Substituted heterocyclic compounds for pharmaceutical use.
  3. US 9,321,644. (2016). Alkylated oxadiazole derivatives.
  4. WO 2012/045672. (2012). Broad heterocyclic compounds.
  5. Relevant patent landscape reports, 2022.

Note: Actual patent documents should be reviewed for detailed claim language and legal status.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,765,100

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.