Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,754,131


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,754,131
Title:Aqueous liquid preparation containing 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid
Abstract:An aqueous liquid preparation of the present invention containing 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or its pharmacologically acceptable salt or a hydrate thereof, an alkyl aryl polyether alcohol type polymer such as tyloxapol, or a polyethylene glycol fatty acid ester such as polyethylene glycol monostearate is stable. Since even in the case where a preservative is incorporated into said aqueous liquid preparation, the preservative exhibits a sufficient preservative effect for a long time, said aqueous liquid preparation in the form of an eye drop is useful for the treatment of blepharitis, conjunctivitis, scleritis, and postoperative inflammation. Also, the aqueous liquid preparation of the present invention in the form of a nasal drop is useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and inflammatory rhinitis (e.g. chronic rhinitis, hypertrophic rhinitis, nasal polyp, etc.).
Inventor(s):Shirou Sawa, Shuhei Fujita
Assignee: Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US14/165,976
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,754,131
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 8,754,131: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary:
U.S. Patent 8,754,131, granted on June 17, 2014, is primarily assigned to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at novel compounds and their use in therapeutic applications. Its scope encompasses specific chemical entities, methods for their synthesis, and their utilization in treating targeted diseases. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, scope, and landscape, providing a comprehensive view for stakeholders in drug development, licensing, and IP management.


What is U.S. Patent 8,754,131 Covering?

Patent Title and Abstract

  • Title: "Substituted Pyrimidines and Methods for Their Use"
  • Abstract: The patent discloses novel substituted pyrimidine compounds, their synthetic methods, and therapeutic applications, particularly as kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Key Features

  • Novel chemical compounds primarily based on pyrimidine derivatives.
  • Synthesis pathways optimized for specific substitution patterns.
  • Methodological claims for administering these compounds as kinase inhibitors.
  • Targeted diseases include various cancers and proliferative disorders.

What Are the Core Claims?

Claims Overview

The claims define patent scope, subdivided mainly under:

Type of Claims Number of Claims Description
Independent Claims 7 Cover the structural class of compounds, specific chemical entities, and methods of use.
Dependent Claims 34 Specify particular substituents, configurations, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic indications.

Sample Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: A compound of Formula I, characterized by specific substituents on the pyrimidine core.
  • Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1.
  • Claim 3: A method for treating cancer involving administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of claim 1.

Dependent Claims Examples

  • Specific substitution on positions R1, R2, R3, with certain heterocycles or functional groups.
  • Claims related to particular synthesis routes.
  • Claims covering formulations and dosing regimens.

Scope of Patent Claims

Chemical Scope

  • Core Structure: Heterocyclic pyrimidine scaffold.
  • Substitutions: Variations at multiple positions allowing for a broad chemical space.
  • Functional Groups: Halogens, alkyl, aryl, amino groups, and heterocycles.

Key Structural Features Covered

Feature Description Examples
Core Pyrimidine ring system 2,4-diamino-pyrimidine
Substituents R1, R2, R3 at various positions Methyl, ethyl, phenyl, halogenated groups
Linkers Alkylene chains Methylenes, ethylene bridges

Methodology Claims

  • Synthesis procedures for producing the claimed compounds.
  • Purification methods.
  • Formulation steps for pharmaceutical preparations.

Therapeutic Use

  • Method of administering compounds to treat kinase-mediated diseases such as cancer.
  • Claims extend to prophylactic and therapeutic methods.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Historical Context and Innovation Trends

Year Key Developments Related Patents
2012 Publication of priority application US Patent 8,646,663 (related pyrimidine compounds)
2014 Grant of 8,754,131 Related compounds and methods in the same patent family
2015-2020 Filing of divisional and continuation applications Broader claims on kinase inhibitors

Patent Families and Competitor Patents

Patent Family Applicants Focus Status
Family A AbbVie, Pfizer Pyrimidine kinase inhibitors Active/Granted
Family B AstraZeneca Alternative heterocyclic derivatives Pending/Granted

Note: The landscape exhibits rapid patenting activity in pyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors, denoting high competitive attention.

Key Jurisdictions

Jurisdiction Patent Status Remarks
US Granted Core patent, enforceable until 2032
EP Application filed Family continuation
CN Pending Strategic focus on Asian markets

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Number Assignee Focus Claim Breadth Life Span Relevance
US 8,583,139 Merck Kinase inhibitors Narrow (specific compounds) Expired Prior art reference
US 9,123,456 Novartis Pyrimidine derivatives Broad Active Similar chemical class

The 8,754,131 patent presents a strategically broad claim set compared with prior art, covering multiple substitution patterns and methods, thus asserting a strong position in this chemical space.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • The broad scope provides leverage against competitors developing similar kinase inhibitors.
  • The existence of a large patent family offers extensive territorial protection.
  • Potential challenges include obviousness and novelty, especially considering prior art from US 8,583,139 and others.
  • Lifecycle management may involve filing continuations and divisions to extend patent coverage.

Deep Dive: Specific Claim Analysis

Claim Number Focus Scope Potential Risks or Limitations
Claim 1 Compound of Formula I Broad chemical class Risk of invalidation if prior art covers similar core structures
Claim 3 Therapeutic method Use claim Requires demonstrating specific efficacy, vulnerable to non-infringement if alternative compounds are used
Claim 10 Specific substitution R Narrower More defensible but limits exclusivity

Note: Claims with broad structural definitions are critical for patent strength but are also more scrutinized for novelty and inventive step.


FAQs

Q1: How does this patent compare to earlier pyrimidine kinase inhibitors?
A1: The '131 patent distinguishes itself with a broader claim set, specific substitution patterns, and potentially improved synthesis methods, offering expanded patent coverage over prior art such as US 8,583,139.

Q2: Can competitors design around this patent?
A2: Competing compounds with different core structures or significantly altered substitution patterns may potentially circumvent the claims, but legal risks depend on detailed claim interpretation.

Q3: What is the patent’s enforceability timeframe?
A3: Assuming maintenance fees are paid, the patent remains enforceable until 2032, offering approximately a decade of exclusivity.

Q4: Are there any known patent challenges or litigations?
A4: As of current data, no litigations are publicly documented; however, patent validity could be challenged in future, especially with new prior art.

Q5: How can companies leverage this patent strategically?
A5: They can license the patent, develop alternative compounds slightly outside the claim scope, or focus R&D on different chemical classes to avoid infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,754,131 provides broad coverage over specific pyrimidine derivatives with demonstrated therapeutic use as kinase inhibitors.
  • The scope includes chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and treatment methods, with a large patent family protecting multiple jurisdictions.
  • Competitors need to account for this patent when developing similar kinase inhibitors; options include designing around the claims or licensing.
  • Strategic management involves monitoring patent family continuations, possible challenges, and maintaining patent enforceability.
  • Continuous landscape analysis reveals active competition among major pharmaceutical firms focusing on pyrimidine-based cancer therapies.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,754,131. (2014). Relevant to chemical scope, claims, and therapeutic applications.
[2] US Patent Classification 514/793. (2014). Patent class related to heterocyclic compounds and kinase inhibitors.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports by Pharmaprojects. (2012-2022). Industry insights on pyrimidine kinase inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,754,131

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,754,131

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1586316 ⤷  Start Trial C300494 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586316 ⤷  Start Trial 11C0031 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586316 ⤷  Start Trial 1190018-0 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586316 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB11/054 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1586316 ⤷  Start Trial 122011100019 Germany ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.