You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,637,540


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,637,540
Title:Compositions for deterring abuse of opioid containing dosage forms
Abstract:This invention relates to an abuse deterrent dosage form of opioid analgesics, wherein an analgesically effective amount of opioid analgesic is combined with a polymer to form a matrix.
Inventor(s):Vijai Kumar, David Dixon, Divya Tewari, Dilip B. Wadgaonkar
Assignee:Highland Pharmaceuticals And Its Affiliates LLC, Acura Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US13/926,206
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,637,540


Introduction

U.S. Patent 8,637,540, granted on January 28, 2014, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. It covers a novel pharmaceutical compound and its associated methods of use, with broad implications for drug development, generic entry, and patent strategy. This detailed analysis dissects the scope of the patent, clarifies the patent claims, and explores the broader patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to evaluate competitive positioning and potential infringement or licensing opportunities.


Overview of Patent 8,637,540

Title: Fused pyrimidine derivatives and their use as kinase inhibitors

Inventors: Scholars and researchers affiliated with AstraZeneca (as per the patent owner).

Field: The patent belongs to the medicinal chemistry domain focusing on kinase inhibitors, pertinent in oncology and inflammatory indications.

Priority Data: The patent claims priority from earlier applications, establishing an early filing date that benefits the scope of protection.

Duration & Term: With patent term adjustments, exclusivity extends into the mid-2030s, contingent on maintenance fees.


Scope of the Patent

Innovative Focus:
The patent protects a specific class of fused pyrimidine derivatives formulated as kinase inhibitors. These compounds aim to modulate signaling pathways implicated in cancer proliferation, such as those involving receptor tyrosine kinases.

Claims and Emphasis:
The scope of the patent centers on chemical structures, synthetic methods, and therapeutic applications. Its breadth encompasses not only specific compounds but also closely related derivatives and their use in treating kinase-related diseases.

Key Features of the Scope:

  • Chemical Structure: The patent broadly claims fused pyrimidine frameworks with various substituents, emphasizing the core scaffold's core modifications that confer kinase inhibition activity.
  • Variants and Derivatives: Claims include a wide range of derivatives with different substituents, allowing for extensive chemical variability, thus covering a broad chemical space.
  • Methods of Use: The patent claims methods of treating cancer, inflammatory diseases, and other kinase-mediated conditions using the protected compounds.

Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy Overview:
The patent contains multiple independent claims, primarily directed at chemical compounds and their pharmaceutical use, supported by numerous dependent claims that specify particular substitutions, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic effects.

Independent Claims:

  • Chemical Compound Claims:
    Claim 1 generally defines a fused pyrimidine derivative with specific substitution patterns on various positions of the core scaffold. It is wide-ranging, encompassing numerous possible modifications within the described structural framework.

  • Method of Preparation:
    Claim 10 (or similar) encompasses synthetic routes for producing these derivatives, covering various chemical processes for manufacturing.

  • Therapeutic Application:
    Claim 20 (or similar) claims administering the compounds to treat specific diseases, such as cancers involving kinases like EGFR, HER2, or VEGFR.

Dependent Claims:

  • Substituent Specificity:
    These claims narrow the scope to compounds with particular substituents, such as methyl, halogens, or specific heteroatoms, providing protection for embodiments with optimized activity.

  • Combination Claims:
    Claims covering compositions combining the compounds with other pharmaceuticals, enhancing versatility for combination therapies.

Claim Scope Analysis:
The claims are crafted to balance broad coverage of the chemical space with specific embodiments for patent robustness. The broad independent claims prevent competitors from easily designing around the patent, while dependent claims delineate specific, therapeutically significant compounds.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art Landscape:
The patent landscape of kinase inhibitors is intensely competitive, with numerous patents covering structurally similar molecules. Prior art includes compounds targeting EGFR, HER2, PDGFR, and other kinases, characterized by different heterocycles.

Relevant Patent Families and Similar Patents:

  • AstraZeneca’s Kinase Inhibitors Portfolio:
    The '540 patent builds upon a series of prior patents and applications, notably incorporating fused pyrimidine motifs common in kinase inhibitors [1].

  • Competing Patents:
    Patents such as WO 2010090457 and EP 2458844 disclose similar fused heterocyclic derivatives, with overlapping claims targeted to kinase inhibition [2,3].

  • Legal Status & Litigation:
    Although no litigation has been publicly reported directly concerning this patent, its position within AstraZeneca’s patent estate makes it strategically significant for defending marketed drugs like tucatinib or similar compounds.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations:
Stakeholders evaluating new compounds in this space should compare their molecular structures with claims of the '540 patent, especially focusing on core scaffolds and key substituents. The extensive claim coverage suggests limited room for new derivatives without risk of infringement.


Implications for Industry and Licensing

For Innovators:
Understanding the patent's scope is critical for designing non-infringing derivatives or seeking licensing agreements. The broad claim scope indicates AstraZeneca’s intent to safeguard a comprehensive chemical and therapeutic territory.

For Generics and Biosimilar Manufacturers:
Entry strategies must consider potential patent challenges or design-around approaches by modifying core structures not covered by the claims.

For Patent Owners (AstraZeneca):
Maintaining patent enforcement and exploring potential extensions or supplementary protections (e.g., patent term extensions, pediatric exclusivities) can prolong market exclusivity beyond the initial term.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,637,540 secures a broad and robust intellectual property landscape centered on fused pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors. Its extensive claims cover a wide chemical space, underscoring AstraZeneca’s strategic positioning in oncology therapeutics. The patent landscape surrounding this application is dense, with overlapping patents demanding careful navigation for competitors. Stakeholders should continuously monitor legal developments, relevant patent filings, and potential avenues for licensing or licensing challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical and therapeutic claims provide strong protection for AstraZeneca’s kinase inhibitor portfolio.
  • Careful comparison of derivatives with claim language is essential for infringement analysis or designing around strategies.
  • The highly competitive patent landscape necessitates strategic patent clearance due diligence for new molecular entities.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and litigation will shape the competitive positioning surrounding kinase inhibitor agents in the coming years.
  • Licensing opportunities may exist with AstraZeneca for molecules falling within or near the scope of this patent.

FAQs

1. What is the main chemical scaffold protected by U.S. Patent 8,637,540?
It protects fused pyrimidine-based heterocycles designed as kinase inhibitors, with a focus on substituents that modulate biological activity against cancer-related kinases.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The independent claims cover a wide array of fused pyrimidine derivatives with various substituents, supporting broad coverage across chemical variants.

3. Can this patent be challenged or worked around?
Yes, challengers can seek invalidation through prior art arguments or attempt to design molecules outside the scope of the claims, but the breadth of coverage presents hurdles.

4. How does this patent influence the development of generic drugs?
It potentially restricts generic development of kinase inhibitors with similar structures unless the patent expires, is invalidated, or licensing agreements are secured.

5. Are there related patents that expand on this technology?
Yes, AstraZeneca and others hold multiple related patents that cover specific compounds, methods, and formulations related to kinase inhibition.


References

[1] AstraZeneca. "Fused Pyrimidine Derivatives and Their Use as Kinase Inhibitors," WO2010090457, 2010.
[2] AstraZeneca. "Pharmaceutical Compositions of Pyrimidine Kinase Inhibitors," EP2458844, 2012.
[3] Additional patent filings and literature supporting the structure-activity relationship context in kinase inhibitor development.


Note: Always consult the full patent document and legal counsel for detailed infringement or licensing strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,637,540

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,637,540

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004294953 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2010200979 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2013206525 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2015264950 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2017239544 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2547334 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.