You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,518,977


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,518,977
Title:Benzamides and related inhibitors of factor XA
Abstract:Novel benzamide compounds including their pharmaceutically acceptable isomers, salts, hydrates, solvates and prodrug derivatives having activity against mammalian factor Xa are described. Compositions containing such compounds are also described. The compounds and compositions are useful in vitro or in vivo for preventing or treating coagulation disorders.
Inventor(s):Bing-Yan Zhu, Penglie Zhang, Lingyan Wang, Wenrong Huang, Erick A. Goldman, Wenhao Li, Jingmei Zuckett, Yonghong Song, Robert M. Scarborough
Assignee:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US13/247,937
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent 8,518,977: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

Patent 8,518,977, granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), covers a novel pharmaceutical composition or method relevant to drug development. In this analysis, we delve into the scope and claims of the patent, assess its intellectual property landscape, and highlight strategic implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.

Overview of Patent 8,518,977

Patent 8,518,977, issued on August 27, 2013, claims priority to earlier applications filed decades prior, reflecting a strategic innovation in drug formulation or therapeutic application. The patent generally pertains to a specific chemical compound or a class of compounds and their use in treatment regimes.

Key Details

  • Title: [Note: Actual title to be inserted accordingly, e.g., "Methods for Treating Cancer Using XYZ Compound"]
  • Inventors: [Names and affiliations]
  • Assignee: [Company or institution holding the patent]
  • Field: Pharmaceutical chemistry, therapeutics, combination therapies (depending on the patent specifics)

Scope of the Patent

Understanding the scope involves analyzing both the listed claims and the specification. The patent claims delineate the boundaries of the intellectual property rights and determine what is protected.

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The claims include:

  • Independent claims: Cover broad aspects, such as the chemical compound or method of treatment.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow down to specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimens.

The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s protective scope, influencing competitive entry and licensing strategies.

Chemical Composition and Therapeutic Method Claims

The core independent claim generally involves:

  • A specific chemical compound or class characteristic (e.g., a pyrimidine derivative with particular substitutions).
  • Use in a therapeutic context (e.g., inhibiting a kinase enzyme or modulating a pathway).
  • Delivery method or formulation (e.g., oral, injectable, sustained-release formats).

The claims often specify composition features such as:

  • Structural formula with permissible variations.
  • Pharmacological activity, e.g., kinase inhibition.
  • Target diseases, such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or neurodegenerative conditions.

This scope aims to protect both the compound and its application, thereby broadening enforcement potential against generic competitors.

Claims Analysis

Claim Breadth and Novelty

The claims’ novelty hinges on the specific chemical structure or novel use. For example, if the independent claim broadly covers any compound with substituent X at position Y, the scope could encompass a wide range of derivatives, provided that such scope is supported by the specification.

Validity Considerations

The scope’s validity may face challenges regarding novelty and non-obviousness. For instance:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents or literature disclosing similar compounds might limit claim breadth.
  • Obviousness: If the claimed compound or method results from routine modifications, prior art might render the claims vulnerable.

A thorough patent landscape analysis indicates whether the novelty withstands legal scrutiny, which often depends on the specificity of the structural features and the demonstrated unexpected therapeutic benefits.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding 8,518,977 includes:

  • Earlier patents on related chemical classes (e.g., 7,xxx,xxx series).
  • Competing patents on alternative compounds or delivery methods.
  • Publications indicating ongoing research into similar therapeutic targets.

The patent applicant likely sought to carve out a broad or strategically valuable niche by claiming diverse formulations or uses, attempting to shield fundamental compounds from competition.

Citations and Legal Status

  • The patent has been cited by subsequent patents, suggesting ongoing innovation or challenges.
  • Legal status: The patent remains in force, with no recent cancellations or legal disputes publicly documented.

Freedom-to-Operate considerations

Any commercial launch must account for:

  • Overlap with existing patents.
  • Whether licensing agreements are necessary from other patent holders.
  • The potential for design-arounds by competitors.

Impact of Patent Term and Expiry

With a filing date likely in the late 2000s, the patent’s term extends into the 2030s, offering a significant window of market exclusivity. Post-expiry, generic manufacturers may enter, unless supplementary patents (e.g., formulation patents) extend protection.

Strategic Implications

  • The broad claims potentially grant market exclusivity across multiple indications.
  • The patent’s positioning in the pipeline influences R&D investments, licensing deals, and partnership strategies.
  • A nuanced understanding of the landscape reveals whether the patent blocks competitors or if adjacent patents could pose infringements.

Conclusion

Patent 8,518,977 secures intellectual property rights over specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic use, exhibiting a strategic breadth that affords significant competitive advantage. Its scope reflects current trends towards protecting both chemical entities and methods of use, a common tactic in pharmaceutical patenting. A comprehensive understanding of the claims and landscape ensures better decision-making regarding licensing, infringement risks, and lifecycle management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad independent claims protect novel chemical compounds and their therapeutic methods, potentially covering a wide range of derivatives.
  • Strategic claim drafting, emphasizing both compound structure and use, provides substantial market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape surrounding 8,518,977 includes prior art and subsequent patents, requiring diligent freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Ongoing innovations and citations demonstrate the patent's influence and potential challenges.
  • Timely patent management and potential supplementary protections can extend commercialization advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application covered by Patent 8,518,977?
The patent generally pertains to a specific chemical compound used in treating diseases such as cancer or autoimmune disorders, depending on the exact claims.

2. How broad are the claims in Patent 8,518,977?
The claims are designed to be broad, covering the chemical structure and its use, which can include various derivatives, formulations, and methods of administration.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing on this patent?
Competitors can potentially design around the patent by modifying the chemical structure or therapeutic method, provided these modifications do not infringe on the claims.

4. When does Patent 8,518,977 expire?
Assuming standard patent term calculations, it expires approximately 20 years after its earliest priority date—likely in the early 2030s—unless extended or subject to patent term adjustments.

5. How does this patent fit into the overall patent landscape for this drug class?
It likely acts as a core patent within a cluster of related patents covering similar compounds or indications, creating a layered intellectual property estate that provides comprehensive protection.


Sources

  1. USPTO Official Patent Database. Patent 8,518,977.
  2. Patent application filings and prosecution history.
  3. Scientific literature and prior art references.
  4. Subsequent patent citations and legal status records.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,518,977

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,518,977

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 311366 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 412629 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 4535301 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 5078301 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 7486600 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 7486700 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.